Widgets Magazine
Page 12 of 20 FirstFirst ... 7891011121314151617 ... LastLast
Results 276 to 300 of 485

Thread: 2013 Oklahoma Earthquake Discussion

  1. #276

    Default Re: 2013 Oklahoma Earthquake Discussion

    So . . . say that those wimpy clay layers under Lake Arcadia decided to stop supporting the weight of all that water and cracked, allowing all the water to drain out, and ending these annoying tremors, would the newly re-revealed slopes be steep enough for skiing?

  2. #277

    Default Re: 2013 Oklahoma Earthquake Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by RadicalModerate View Post
    So . . . say that those wimpy clay layers under Lake Arcadia decided to stop supporting the weight of all that water and cracked, allowing all the water to drain out, and ending these annoying tremors, would the newly re-revealed slopes be steep enough for skiing?
    We've already got the "steep" (two landfill mountains), we just never get enough of the "deep" (snowpack). I've often thought that if we ever had enough snow, I'd like to hike up and poach a few runs. Though the thought of wiping out and coming up impaled by various bits of OKC debris is a bit of a turn off.

  3. #278

    Default Re: 2013 Oklahoma Earthquake Discussion

    So how come nobody has ever invented artificial snow?
    (and I don't mean the stuff from those ski resort snow blowers. I mean artificial snow. That you can pack as deep as you want)

  4. #279

    Default Re: 2013 Oklahoma Earthquake Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by RadicalModerate View Post
    So how come nobody has ever invented artificial snow?
    (and I don't mean the stuff from those ski resort snow blowers. I mean artificial snow. That you can pack as deep as you want)
    No one plays in snow anymore, in fact, I believe snow was just a myth.

  5. #280

    Default Re: 2013 Oklahoma Earthquake Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by RadicalModerate View Post
    So how come nobody has ever invented artificial snow?
    (and I don't mean the stuff from those ski resort snow blowers. I mean artificial snow. That you can pack as deep as you want)
    Funny you say that, a few years ago, a group of investors tried to bring to Oklahoma, one of these:

    YEAR ROUND SNOW SPORTS NOW Available In The United States From ALL-SEASON EXTREME

  6. #281

    Default Re: 2013 Oklahoma Earthquake Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by ThomPaine View Post
    Funny you say that, a few years ago, a group of investors tried to bring to Oklahoma, one of these:

    YEAR ROUND SNOW SPORTS******* NOW Available In The United States From ALL-SEASON EXTREME
    Where do I invest?

  7. #282

    Default Re: 2013 Oklahoma Earthquake Discussion

    http://www.oklahoman.com/article/3903779?embargo=1
    Central Oklahoma homeowners whose houses shook from recent earthquakes may be surprised to learn they'll have to wait a month or two if they want to buy earthquake insurance.

    A 30- to 60-day lockout period, due to the likelihood of aftershocks in the area, is just one of many details Oklahoma residents should be aware of when shopping for earthquake insurance. Higher deductibles also might give some pause.
    Doak said earthquake policies in Oklahoma can cost between $100 and $150 per year, depending on the insurance company and the homeowner's level of coverage.
    Doak said Oklahoma earthquake coverage is structured similarly to those in other states in that it has higher deductibles than typical homeowners' insurance. Earthquake coverage usually has a deductible at 5 percent or 10 percent of the home's value. At 10 percent, out-of-pocket costs to repair earthquake damage would be $12,000 for a $120,000 house, the median home value in Oklahoma County.

  8. #283

  9. #284

    Default Re: 2013 Oklahoma Earthquake Discussion

    So I'm guessing we can expect a decent jolt about once or twice a day now?

  10. Default Re: 2013 Oklahoma Earthquake Discussion

    Probably. Did get one yesterday afternoon south of Prague and north of Seminole...so maybe they'll start migrating back out there.

    I still haven't felt any of them recently here in Norman, but they haven't been all that strong.

  11. #286

    Default Re: 2013 Oklahoma Earthquake Discussion

    Yeah, I was afraid of this very thing - called my agent a week or so ago and they added the earthquake rider immediately. Said it was no problem. I opted to strike while the iron was hot. I had called before after the bigger quake a couple of years ago, and it was no-go until the "blackout" period had passed.

  12. #287

    Default Re: 2013 Oklahoma Earthquake Discussion

    just felt one in edmond. 2:45pm.

  13. #288

    Default Re: 2013 Oklahoma Earthquake Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by OkieHornet View Post
    just felt one in edmond. 2:45pm.
    Had to be smaller than a 2.5. USGS reports last earthquake activity near Luther, yesterday around 4:37pm.

  14. #289

    Default Re: 2013 Oklahoma Earthquake Discussion

    The upside of all of this is that "they" say that lots of little shocks-n-jolts relieves the pressure that causes REAL earthquakes.
    At least that's what THEY say . . . [insert obligatory Theremin arpeggio . . .]

    The upside of artificial snow--soon to cover the ski slopes of the former Lake Arcadia--is that it isn't cold.
    Plus it doesn't melt so you can enjoy something other than waterskiing even in the summertime.

  15. #290

    Default Re: 2013 Oklahoma Earthquake Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by OKCisOK4me View Post
    Had to be smaller than a 2.5. USGS reports last earthquake activity near Luther, yesterday around 4:37pm.
    turned out to be a 2.7, but sure felt like the others that have been 3+ recently. maybe it was closer and shallower?

  16. #291

    Default Re: 2013 Oklahoma Earthquake Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by OkieHornet View Post
    turned out to be a 2.7, but sure felt like the others that have been 3+ recently. maybe it was closer and shallower?
    That could be. Like I told a friend, I felt a second one on Sunday evening at 7:00pm and it wasn't registered anywhere (that I know of) but the house clearly shook!

  17. #292

    Default Re: 2013 Oklahoma Earthquake Discussion

    6:17 pm

    At least a M3.0 or greater (to take a guess).

  18. #293

    Default Re: 2013 Oklahoma Earthquake Discussion

    3.4 according to OGS:

    2013-11-15 00:17:31.830999 35.596 +/- 1.8 -97.382 +/- 1.8 7.0 +/- 2.5 3.4 ML OGS

  19. Default Re: 2013 Oklahoma Earthquake Discussion

    USGS took it down to 3.0 it looks like. This one was back SE of Edmond, so maybe they'll start migrating back that direction.

  20. #295

    Default Re: 2013 Oklahoma Earthquake Discussion

    I find it curious that OGS consistently rates quakes higher than USGS...

  21. #296

    Default Re: 2013 Oklahoma Earthquake Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by Of Sound Mind View Post
    I find it curious that OGS consistently rates quakes higher than USGS...
    Is Mike Morgan associated with one of them?

  22. #297

    Default Re: 2013 Oklahoma Earthquake Discussion

    Oklahoma needs to stop ignoring all the studies that have linked disposal wells to earthquakes. Its time follow the lead of other states and set regulations to prevent disposal wells near fault lines.
    https://stateimpact.npr.org/oklahoma...isposal-wells/

  23. #298

    Default Re: 2013 Oklahoma Earthquake Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by slz View Post
    Oklahoma needs to stop ignoring all the studies that have linked disposal wells to earthquakes. Its time follow the lead of other states and set regulations to prevent disposal wells near fault lines.
    https://stateimpact.npr.org/oklahoma...isposal-wells/
    Great first post but I doubt that's the reason. There was an article in The Oklahoman (which you'll think is a conspiracy) showing all the disposal well sites across all of Oklahoma and where fault lines are. The earthquakes aren't happening where all the disposal well sites are.

  24. #299

    Default Re: 2013 Oklahoma Earthquake Discussion

    GOOD GOLLY! Not long after 2:30 am, I felt an earthquake in Stillwater for the first time since the 1st aftershock from the biggest one in 2011. This quake happened like how the low rumbling sound of not too distant thunder can rattle your house. The noise was more dramatic than the shaking. It only lasted probably no more than two or three seconds. Still, it was kinda frightening and glad it didn't last longer.

  25. #300

    Default Re: 2013 Oklahoma Earthquake Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by Bunty View Post
    GOOD GOLLY! Not long after 2 am, I finally felt an earthquake in Stillwater for the first time since the 1st aftershock from the biggest one in 2011. The sudden noise and slight shaking feeling only lasted no more than a second or two. The noise, like a quick explosion somewhat in the distance, was probably more noticeable than the shaking. Still, it was kinda frightening and glad it didn't last longer.
    So that quake turns up as 5 miles east of Stillwater, magnitude 3.0 at 02.37 am. Source: http://stillwaterweather.com/okareaearthquakes.php

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 8 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 8 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Oklahoma Earthquake Activity
    By venture in forum Weather & Geosciences
    Replies: 211
    Last Post: 02-03-2024, 12:57 AM
  2. Replies: 1068
    Last Post: 09-23-2013, 07:00 PM
  3. Oklahoma Weather Discussion - January 2013
    By venture in forum Weather & Geosciences
    Replies: 154
    Last Post: 01-31-2013, 07:52 PM
  4. Oklahoma Weather Discussion - December 2012
    By venture in forum Weather & Geosciences
    Replies: 408
    Last Post: 01-01-2013, 09:51 PM
  5. Oklahoma Fire Weather Discussion 2011
    By venture in forum Weather & Geosciences
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 06-14-2011, 11:54 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO