Originally Posted by
PhiAlpha
The mass shooting number differences are hard to argue with but it doesn’t say anything about mass homicides in general after that time period which I think would’ve been important to include in the article. That article also doesn’t discuss much about the murder and suicide trends in the 20-30 year time prior to the gun buy backs going into effect which I think is fairly important in determining a cause and effect relationship (ie was this the beginning of the trend or was it already in a fairly significant decline beforehand). They should’ve further broken it down into murders and suicides by gun and by other methods. I guess my point being, if that article is trying to convince anyone other than the people who already agree with them that guns are the problem, it isn’t very convincing and has a bunch of holes that could’ve easily been filled if they’d either done more research or chosen to include the additional statistics.
Also something that none of the anti-gun posters have addressed. We’ve always had a ton of guns but why the uptick in large scale mass shootings, school shootings in particular, after the late 1980s?
Bookmarks