Re: What do you consider the "urban core"?
Originally Posted by
Mel
good post.
I consider the urban core to be N 30th or so (Paseo) down to S 30th (Capital Hill), Penn (Plaza) to MLK/Eastern (Eastside). Within the core, you have nearly ALL of OKC's urban districts and what 'should' be its densest area for population, development, resources, and amenities. In the core you have multi-family and multi-level development - something OKC should strive for more of and less suburban oriented development.
Inside the core, you have Downtown (13th to the River, Western to Lincoln) and all of the downtown districts with THE most density in the city. Downtown should have NO suburban development and all development should be pushed to the sidewalk. Surface lots allowable outside of the CBD until they can be developed. Within Downtown you have the CBD, which is expanding but used to be 4th to Sheridan, Hudson to EKG. Today I'd venture to push the CBD down to the new Blvd, to now to encompass Cox and the Peake and the MBG.
On that thought - I think locations should be named by function and connectivity of use rather than "intended" use or false advertising (as in the large area of the Arts District - which IMO should really just be the OKC civic center campus and a few blocks every direction encompassing the art deco/moderne low-rise buildings).
It's all subjective really as those are my opinion.
Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!
Bookmarks