Caught on the council meeting that Del City is going to start a pilot program of speed bumps at stop sign controlled intersections.
This is aimed to prevent people running stop signs so the explanation went.
Norman is already doing this
We will see
Caught on the council meeting that Del City is going to start a pilot program of speed bumps at stop sign controlled intersections.
This is aimed to prevent people running stop signs so the explanation went.
Norman is already doing this
We will see
Ew...now that's a total pain in the rear.
Drive a lot thru Norman... Never encounter a speed bump. Del City should not do this. There are more stop signs here than in OKC. As bombermwc said, way too much a pain to deal with going up and down. Someone will have a spinal injury and will sue the city.
Are they in cahoots with a Firestone or local car dealership?
Let me invest heavily in Shocks-R-Us.... lol
Holy Cow! I moved out of Del City just in time. My dad still lives there so I'll still be stuck with them. Near Epperly Heights there are three stop sign in 300 feet on Lariet between Mallard and Del Road.
And one was removed a few months ago, because of those stop signs interfering with the driveways location. Still, the placement of the street warrants no stop sign, but there is a couple there for no reason. This is a traffic street...no reason to stop I do not know who idea it was to place those stop signs there.
In other states...they have had "ridges" on the roadway to warn you that a stop sign is upcoming...now--that is not a speed bump to me, bumps are huge and make your transmission hit bottom...ridges are not unlike the famous "Botts Dots" on freeways between lanes and when you drift it makes a big racket and you get a free massage...they are also reflectors for night driving...
Spend millions making the roads smooth and then spend more money making them bumpy. Yep, that sound about like government.
In Norman the ambulance drivers and the fire-fighters HATE them. They are way too big. Also, after snow and ice those streets don't get plowed.
And miscellaneous parts of the car!
As I recall...it was Juel Sweatt the owner of the Sonic Drive-In on Lindsay--back when that was the "place to be" for teenagers in the 1960's--who was the first to add those dreadful things--and they caught on from there...
Is he the same as the Classic Fifties? I've been here for 30 years but still don't have the past completely straight. I know they are different companies but I wasn't sure if there was a past connection.
Speed bumps precede anything Sonic has done by decades. They were being used as early as the begining of the 1900's.
I wouldn't mind the horizontal paint lines as much, but the reflectors are a pain as well. Not to mention the paint would be waaaaay cheaper. It's just like having some of the "test" paint areas on the highways, just do it on purpose on a road. I think these would be good out in the rural areas where people don't see the "stop sign ahead" signs hidden behind the trees and then slam their breaks on at the intersection.
Years ago I served on the MWC Traffic and Safety Commission and we had a proposal to consider speed bumps to be used selectively in MWC. After several weeks of study, we decided to not recommend installation to the MWC City Council, but not primarily for the reasons listed here.
Mainly, anecdotal information from other communities indicated that speed bumps had little or no effect in slowing or stopping traffic. Liabilty because of lawsuits alleging auto damage or personal injuries far outweighed any perceived benefit of the speed bump or even speed hump. (wider version - as seen in new shopping area on 29th)
One would hope Del City would come to their senses.
why would there be liability? motorists have a legal obligation to operate their vehicle in a safe manner. if someone is driving over an obstacle too fast or out of control, that couldn't possibly be the city's fault.
Put in traffic circles and do away with the stop sign completely. Problem solved.
That's why I said "lawsuits alleging auto damage or personal injuries...". Even if the city is found not liable or not culpable, they still have to deal with the legalities, including attorney fees (even for the city attorney) and responses. The primary reason for the decision made at that time was the report of the ineffectiveness.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks