Originally Posted by
kevinpate
So now I am again confuzzled. It seems as though the candidate now suggests Hammam was capable of being extremely untruthful during court, even though at the time she under the guidance of counsel, who must balance advocacy for a client with the obligations inherent in being an officer of the court.
If one is to believe Hammam capable of repeatedly lying in court during the proceedings, what does it say about a candidate who seeks out, one might even opine parades out, that very same person to vouch for, even praise, the candidate as the next best hope for the city?
Interesting poster.
Bookmarks