OKC has weak-mayor. The mayor is merely a spokesperson, and 1 of 9 votes on council. He is more of a city-wide councilman.
Strong mayor means the mayor has ultimate authority on the approval/disapproval.
Edgar, given your preferred challenger' lack of municipal voting record, his beyond merely unimpressive explanation for same, his background, and how he has approached it, his attacks on MAPs after previously pitching it needs to go forward, not having any debates would have to be seen as an act of kindness to your choice more than anything else.
Like you though, I am not an OKC voter. Should the challenger or anyone want to kick his positions, odd representations and suitablility for office across a stage and back again, that's not a call for me to make. His handlers though should probably keep him as far from that idea as they can. I can not imagine it ending well for him.
What good is a debate, when you can't trust El Shadid to keep his word?
Show me what you'll do, candidate, don't tell me. Ed has shown me quite enough, thank you, and then some. Every single thing that has happened since his election strengthens my decision to vote for Mick.
I think it is telling that a lot of strong Democrats are planning to vote for Republican Mick.
Not that parties have as much to do with municipal elections as they do at higher levels, but it indicates a real problem with Shadid here.
Going to post this every page until he answers:
Edgar,
How do you reconcile Ed's lack of civic participation with his desire to undo what has passed a vote of city residents?
Absentee voting records is an issue I have discovered - I voted in a couple elections while deployed and when I had an opportunity to look at my voting record, those votes were missing. Every other election I have voted in was listed but none of my absentee ballots. It verifies that absentee votes are likely not counted unless the election is close enough to be changed by those ballots.
This Wednesday, noon, Ed is the featured guest at OCPAC.
Knowing Ed, he will tell them he wants to stop the MAPS tax collection and hire more police and firemen. He'll leave out the end poverty, fix the educational system, build a bus system that will transport the poor and carless to the tune of tens of millions of dollars of O&M part. Will they be fooled? Have they been paying attention?
Wonder how well received it would be if some of his most diehard transit fans showed up waving signs that say
Whadda We Want?
More Busses!
When do we want 'em?
Now!
The fact that he's trying to suck up to OCPAC is further evidence that he is willing to deceive for votes. He'll leave out 75% of his stated campaign goals and hope they haven't been paying attention. Slimy at best, dishonest in actuality. Leopards don't change their spots.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Bookmarks