This type of backlash (expressed by The Lost Ogle) was certainly predicted when we first starting talking about OG&E building a new HQ and why -- in my humble opinion -- they decided to go through a developer rather than build it directly themselves; especially on a site where the demolition is going to bring even more unwanted scrutiny:
My only complaint is that ****** OG&E is going to be a tenant. Things must be going well for the legal monopoly that they can afford a nice new shiny building. Screw lowering our rates, or coming up with a better notification system
^
People will only be upset because we all appreciate the work you do and it will be sorely missed.
However, I hope you get a nice long vacation and some quality time with the family. Well deserved!
Let the tower news settle with the populace for a little while. Smooth move...
Have a great break Steve. You certainly do deserve it!
It's sad this tool and others have a viewpoint like this. He obviously knows very little, if anything, about OGE and how they run their business and how they continually fight to keep customer rates near the lowest in the country. This tower won't effect rates much at all. But, the EPA/Obama driven scrubbers and other environmental regulations will. Know your facts before you make yourself look like an idiot, Patrick.
I did see a little humor in the growing balls reference.
I wouldn't mind temporary increases for a total conversion to natural gas (they should be called OCG&E) and for infrastructure improvements like buried lines. The scrubbers are okay and should help with smog and ozone pollution that can cause serious health problems especially those with cardio vascular diseases, but it seems like it would be a better long term solution to invest in the infrastructure to convert Oklahoma electricity to natural gas.
Either way, there's always going to be critics of what can be seen as superficial spending by a government sanctioned monopoly. That's a pretty easy target, especially in a state where many call themselves conservative.
The design is nice, but I am deeply disappointed in the height and general purpose. As with so many developments, we were sold on bigger promises. I was willing to trade my principles and lose Stage Center in exchange for something truly unique - something that would significantly add to OKC's skyline and urban fabric. This ain't it. This tract is among the most desirable in the downtown area. It deserves better.
I realize that big real estate development is a difficult and messy process, but I am also troubled by back-tracking and lack of concrete, forward-thinking plans. In the past, this has led to new surface parking!
Not trying to be snarky, but having a hard time figuring out why one can't write more than 1"big news" article and contact necessary sources in a 2 week span? Taking holiday time for Christmas is one thing, and encourage those able to take time off to do so, but just for the sake of " it's hard work" is another. Journalists in "Big League Cities" write big stories multiple times a week if not daily.
I say we wait and see what the final design will look like. Again, these are conceptual plans only, and the true design work has not even started. When its all said and done, this tower might end up 'at least 20 stories'. And the parcel designated for the other tower is open any developer and that high-rise might end up being our first true modern residential high-rise in downtown. I think they just wanted to get something in front of the DDRC as soon as possible to get the Stage Center demolition process going, because they know it will take some time to get approved. I would not be surprised if the DDRC rejects his application for demolition, until he presents more concrete plans/designs for the site.
Wow, Metro. Come on. Your disclaimer that you "don't mean to sound snarky" cannot hide your snarkiness here. The man is entitled to a vacation. If he wants to take it now, or in March, or in September, what is it to you? Using the "Big League City" theme to criticize Steve for not delivering articles on your timeline is unfair. After all, "Big League Cities" might have more than one person covering a particular beat. In fact, hey! So does The Oklahoman. Isn't William Crum now on the downtown beat?
There are currently 133 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 133 guests)
Bookmarks