Originally Posted by
CaptDave
Of everything on Doug's blog page, comparing this small section to Dr Shadid's actions after the election should be enough for most people to decide whether this is indicative of a person who has earned the trust of the citizens of OKC.
"Posts by Ed Shadid In His Facebook Page
MAPS3 is a bond with the voters. It must be implemented in its entirety with transparency and with the maximum public deliberation. Mr. Swinton risks the legitimacy of future referendums by essentially eliminating the rail component. We do not get to pick and choose which projects we (or our unknown financial sponsors) want to move forward.
Thought MAPS 3 guaranteed light rail transit? Think again. Delay means losing $60-120 million in federal matching funds and making the project cost prohibitive by not coordinating with Project 180. Study the candidates comments closely."
OK, let's do that.
Shadid said he is not anti-MAPS as other candidates supported by firefighters have been labeled.
“I support the implementation of all aspects of MAPS 3 as promised to the voters with maximum openness, transparency and public deliberation,” he said."
Shadid said the only thing he has made clear at dozens of neighborhood meetings and candidate forums is he completely supports MAPS 3.
“I'm for implementation of all of the MAPS 3 projects with maximum openness, transparency, public deliberation, and I consider it a bond with the voters,” he said. “I've never said anything else.”
TrustED? The facts make that difficult. I harbor no personal animus toward Dr Shadid, but it is very difficult to reconcile his actions with his rhetoric.
Bookmarks