There were only a few people invited to those meetings (reportedly), Rick Cain wasn't one of them. Shadid was not on the City Council at that point.
There were only a few people invited to those meetings (reportedly), Rick Cain wasn't one of them. Shadid was not on the City Council at that point.
I don't know what this (your quote) is in reference to, but let me tell you something, the Red Dirt Report is nothing but a freaking shill for the Shadid campaign. I wish I had sense to screen capture the threads on that blog that have been modified and all of the comments that have been deleted.
They (Red Dirt report) lays down innuendo (about me) and then deletes the formal response I made in the comments along with all of the other public comments posted online. Questions over streetcar route selection process leads to war of words | Red Dirt Report
I WON'T WASTE MY TIME RESPONDING AGAIN.
You guys at the Shadid Campaign can go F+CK YOURSELVES.
That's outrageous. I wrote a lengthy comment when the article was published countering the misinformation being reported, and you're right...I just checked the website and all of the comments have been deleted. Outrageous. That's not journalism, it's propaganda. If you can't handle the criticism, don't publish the bull sh*t.
I covered this controversy. Edgar, you are either misinformed or providing bad information. The mayor did not, and still can not, make this call on his own. It is true that Kirk Humphreys asked city staff to do a report on the banner policy. He called for a vote (something any council member can do). The council, and the mayor, took this action with a split majority vote. The action was later overturned by the courts.
The mayor is a significant position. But this version of history is pure fiction.
I do have questions as to why Rick Cain and Russell Claus have been excluded from a lot of important consultant hires and planning decisions.
I think we both know the answer to that one. It has little to do with the actions of the Mayor and Council, and everything to do with standard operating procedures of the City Manager. Quite clearly one of the primary reasons we lost Russell Claus. Your article "When Planning is Denied a Vote in Shaping the City" tells the tale. Thanks for reposting it on your blog.
I wasn't in those meetings either, but instead of whining about it, I decided to work as hard as I could to try and give the voters what they voted for, what Ed even admits allowed MAPS to pass: a streetcar. Because when the city asks the voters to approve projects as a plebiscite, it removes the City Council from acting as a representative body to one that is charged with carrying out the will of the voters. To ignore their wishes is to subvert the democratic process.
In addition, Ed was so far removed from the MAPS political process that he didn't even bother to vote. If you don't care enough to vote, you have abdicated the right to complain about the outcome, I've always told myself.
That's fine. Enjoy your life in spite of how you vote knowing that you are against things that are beneficial for others even if it might benefit you without you knowing it. I regularly vote in favor of school issues even though I haven't had a child in public schools for 14 years. It's not always about me like some people think.
Surely you can come up with a link? This wouldn't be the first time your charges were not 100% accurate. I don't doubt a Republican candidate for the Senate attempted to go after the religious anti-tolerance folks, but doing so as you suggest, your word ain't exactly solid gold around here.
that hurts Mid, really stings.
Still no link? When I search for him, I find him doing a lot of things Shadid would probably never do--talking to the media about how OKC's investment in itself has paid off, talking about how we're the most entrepreneurial city in the country, telling others how they can replicate our success, etc. While Cornett is out there being a leader and telling America how great we are, Shadid would prefer to remain here embroiled in politics and intrigue. No one's going to look at him as a leader. He probably doesn't even see himself as a leader--more a crusader going up against the powers that be for honor and glory.
I don't think there's anything malevolent about the intent of the OKC Alliance. I will agree with Ed that it's unfortunate they can't be a little more transparent, but I certainly can't argue with the results.
There are currently 50 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 50 guests)
Bookmarks