So turn over to the local govt. not only questions of zoning, but turn the city staff into the uber developer as well? Require govt. control of specific business per available location rather than location of general type of zones?
You might want to think on that a bit longer. Perhaps even envision some of the unintended consequences of such submission to govt. control.
Kevin, feel free to save your hyperbole for elsewhere as I said nothing about the government controlling anything. I stated that I thought it would have been cool if Norman could have swayed BWW to choose Main St. as their destination instead of a field on the way to Noble. A business that is as busy as BWW could help drive traffic for the rest of Main St. Instead, this BWW will be yet another development on the fringe as opposed to bringing some additional life to another area that I'd like to see continue to grow and I see that as a disappointment.
What hyperbole? You were specifically asked by another poster:
You respondedDo you want the city to dictate that a business can't locate in a properly zoned area because they think it would fit better somewhere else?
No hyperbole involved when you are willing to allow the govt. to dictate to Developer A it can not have a project solely because the city wants the project to go on another location (which may or may not have any connection to Developer A.)Yes, exactly. Focus on something other than if it has the correct zoning and maybe consider correct fit.
I guess the city shouldn't "dictate" where the business can open, but I do think the city could have a better development focus. Do you really think this proposed location is the best one they could have chosen in Norman?
My point is, it is not the city's choice, and it shouldn't be, to tell a developer "We don't approve setting a BWW at Hwy 9. We want you or someone else to drop one at Main/Crawford. We think that will help downtown. It's your problem if you don't own any downtown property. A BWW goes there in Norman or not at all."
on edit.
I do think a city can approach property owners and encourage, via incentives, to develop their DT property, or their property anywhere, in a manner that promotes growth in the area, or discourages it when appropriate (like buying up a buffer area near Sutton Wilderness a while back to preserve it)
That's a fair point. After pondering this, I don't think it should be an all or nothing situation either. That certainly wouldn't help anyone.
This second thought is what I would like to see. I think it could be a good approach to helping solidify Norman's downtown (or whatever area they're interested in bolstering/protecting/discouraging/etc).
If they ever actually move forward with the Wal-mart/Lowe's there at Hwy. 9/77... then, I would say YES, it is probably the best location for them at the moment. Personally, I'm hoping that with them going forward with a BWW there, it means they are foreshadowing something about the Wal-Mart/Lowe's finally getting built soon.
But, what do I know? I'm just a small minded sprawler...
Wichita and Kevin, I reread this thread and I did not intend to sound as abrasive as I might have. I certainly value both of your opinions and contributions to the thread. I just want to see Norman start reaching some of its potential and I don't think this development helps it do that as much as I would like. But that may be living in a fantasy land.
I respect you saying this in this manner... And, I would say that on paper I wouldn't necessarily disagree with you. HOWEVER. I live in the Norman area and I am what I would consider a fairly conscientious citizen and consumer. Just as an example, I have been wanting to try out Abner's since it opened, but because it's downtown I just haven't done it yet... Meanwhile, if there is a BWW at Hwy 9/Hwy 77 area, I will eat there weekly, at least. I guess a lot of it is a logistics issue... It's ridiculous to say that downtown Norman is any worse than a suburban location with a big parking lot when it comes to the logistics. But, yet there is still that "feeling" that it's a different animal.
Maybe that's part of the reason why there is such a disconnect when it comes to downtown Norman development.
Fwiw, my own preferences for DT Norman fit well with what has been happening already. Abners, Syrup, Bison Wiches, some retail, some professional, some blue collar, an oversll mix that includes a smattering of residential (could use some more)
to me that all fits better than a bww or most any large chain unit.
I have heard that BWW is going in on Hwy 9 West, by Riverwind. If that's not the case, does anyone know what's going in by that McDonald's?
Not a clue. It's a bit of a mystery. I tend to speculate it's because we're more beef and tater folk than chicken wang folk. Further evidence of that perhaps comes from being a college town that couldn't sustain a Hooters. Not a fan myself, but I have often found that a tad humorous over the years.
As a student here for a few years now, the location they've chosen is exponentially better to reach my cohort than Campus Corner or Main Street, both of which can be a huge pain in the ass to park at and walk to or from. The location they have has a fairly sizable parking lot, it's very close to every major student apartment complex, and it takes less time to get to from Main campus than Main Street does.
If the goal is simply to profit the most possible, I think this is absolutely a good location. Anyone who lived at Robinson, or north of Robinson, would still find it faster to go to Moore than Campus Corner anyway, and about the same amount of time to Main Street.
BTW, the BWW looks like it's ready to open any day now... Banners out front say OPENING SOON and HIRING and they have been there for a couple of weeks.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Bookmarks