There seems to be interest in this topic in a variety of ways.
There seems to be interest in this topic in a variety of ways.
Have at it you silly gooses! Thanks ou48a!!
Is there are way to move the "DART only" posts from the streetcar thread over to this one? I hate it went so far astray of the original intent.
Pete can do it. He does from time to time with other threads.
There is plenty to talk about besides DART….
Road construction, DFW airport, Megabus, policy decisions, and I’m sure there is more….
I recently went through DFW and one of the highway interchanges is completly torn up. Are they putting in flyovers like the High-Five interchange?
635 is a mess but I have no idea what they are doing....
If you would have read post 3008 of mine on the linked thread more carefully you would have seen that they are reconstructing I-635 LBJ.
They are rebuilding I 635 from I-35 to US- 75 over the next several years. Some lanes will apparently be turned into toll lanes.
http://www.okctalk.com/showthread.php?t=20121&page=121
I thought you live in DFW. I have known about this since this past winter and before I made my OU Texas hotel reservations.
Nope - I live in OKC. I go down to DFW about once every couple of months.
This is over a year old, but it provides a good overview of the project.
Personally, I would try to avoid this area for the next few years.
http://www.dallasnews.com/news/trans...under-way-.ece
By MICHAEL A. LINDENBERGER The Dallas Morning News Transportation Writer
mlindenberger@dallasnews.com
20 April 2011 11:00 PM
Drivers already plagued by some of Texas’ slowest traffic on LBJ Freeway are about to learn just how bad things can get, as crews begin the total reconstruction of one of the nation’s busiest freeways.
The potential for disruption is profound, as thousands of businesses line the busy corridor and 270,000 cars travel the segment between U.S. 75 and Interstate 35E daily, making it the most heavily traveled corridor in North Texas and the third most-congested in Texas.
The $2.7 billion reconstruction, one of the biggest and most complex construction projects in Dallas history, will not add any free lanes to the highway. But it will rebuild those lanes and improve its network of frontage roads. When complete, the new highway will run above six new paid lanes that will be dug deep into the ground below the highway.
Preliminary work on the project began months ago, but for most drivers, the real headaches will begin early next month when crews close carpool lanes to make way for the road builders.
Those carpool lanes — one in each direction — are the region’s busiest, and carry 44,000 passengers a day. Those travelers will have to decide whether to take another route to work or force their way into the already crowded main lanes.
An open house Thursday will give nearby residents, business owners and motorists a closer look at what the coming five years of construction will mean. The information session is at the Sheraton North Dallas hotel, 4801 LBJ Freeway, from 1 to 8 p.m.
The rebuilt highway will be Dallas’ first to offer a mix of paid and free lanes, joining a similar project in Houston and in Fort Worth as the state’s first so-called managed lane projects. Both the Fort Worth project, known as the North Tarrant Express, and the new LBJ are being built and largely financed by a team of investors led by Spanish toll road firm Cintra.
That team of private investors will control the project for 52 years, maintain all of its lanes and collect tolls on the optional paid lanes that will be several times higher than those charged by the North Texas Tollway Authority.
But for drivers, the new headaches will come long before they must decide whether to pay the new tolls.
LBJ Freeway carries 100,000 more vehicles every day than it was designed to. And no matter who got the job — or whether it involved toll lanes or free lanes or both — the prospect of rebuilding it while trying to keep traffic moving along Dallas’ busiest east-west corridor was never going to be painless.
While under construction, the lanes will be redrawn regularly because the firms’ contract with the state requires that it keep four main lanes in each direction available for traffic. But which of the five lanes that exist now will be kept open will change from week to week as construction needs change, said spokesman Andy Rittler of the LBJ Infrastructure Group, the project’s builders.
The construction will mean five years of hassles for drivers and business owners alike, though officials with the state and the road builders say they are working hard to minimize those problems.
“We have to really push on the front end with the drivers to educate themselves about the changes,” Rittler said. “It’s going to take some time, and it’s going to be a little messy for three or four months. Hopefully, drivers will then get used to it, because we’re going to change lane configurations quite a bit — probably on a weekly basis.”
Lots of projects
The reconstruction of LBJ Freeway is one of a handful of multibillion-dollar highway projects under way that have together marked North Texas out as one of the country’s busiest areas when it comes to building highways.
But with that explosion in new highways — almost all of which have included tolls — has come significant consternation for commuters.
Near Grapevine, state officials are constructing the DFW Connector, a complex series of improvements aimed as detangling the famously snarled Grapevine Funnel. It’s a project, about half the size of the LBJ job, that’s been among the top priorities of North Tarrant elected officials for decades, and its kickoff last year was greeted with wide applause.
But so far, the cost of progress has been a pain for drivers and businesses in the area, said one of its longest-tenured advocates, Mayor William D. Tate of Grapevine.
“At times, it’s been pretty frustrating to the drivers and to the businesses here,” said Tate, noting that some businesses have seen sales drop as a result.
“And the accidents have nearly doubled this year over last year,” he said, leading to efforts to improve signage and lower the construction zone speed limit to 50 mph. “They do a lot of the work at night, so you wake up in the morning, and there is a different highway to negotiate on the way to work. That’s very confusing at times, so you really have to be on your toes.”
Be aware
Rittler said the best advice his company can offer drivers is to stay informed about the changing landscape that will confront them as they drive LBJ over the next five years.
“Know before you go,” he said, echoing a motto he said will help drivers avoid accidents.
The company maintains a website — www.lbjexpress.com — where motorists and business owners can subscribe to text and email alerts that will keep them informed, he said.
That kind of information can help, said Walter Humann.
Humann helped spearhead the public support for the reconstruction of U.S. 75 between Dallas and Plano in the 1990s, a project that probably came closest to creating the kinds of challenges that confront the LBJ reconstruction.
But Humann said problems were fewer than expected, thanks in part to constant communication among the builders and area businesses and commuters.
The two projects share something else, too, however. In both cases, the years-long construction efforts weren‘t enough to end traffic jams for the majority of those who use the roads daily.
In the case of U.S. 75, the new lanes quickly filled up with new traffic, and traffic there routinely slows to a stop during rush hours.
Where the money is coming from:
A team of private companies led by the Spanish toll road firm Cintra will finance and build the new LBJ Freeway, reconstructing existing lanes, improving the frontage roads and adding new paid lanes which will be much more expensive than typical toll roads.
The state of Texas contributed $490 million, and the U.S. government provided a low-cost loan of $850 million. In addition, private firms behind the project invested $664 million in equity, and took advantage of a government-sponsored tax-free bond program to borrow to borrow another $615 million.
What’s happening this year:
By May, the existing HOV lane on 635 will be closed for the duration of the project
Utility relocations along entire corridor
I-35E/Loop 12 interchange
Reconstruction of Joe Ratliff pedestrian bridge
Reconstruction of Rosser, Hillcrest, Preston and Welch bridges
Wow - I heard something about underground lanes but had no idea of the extent.
The wife talked me into taking Dart’s Green rail line for the OU-Texas game.
We boarded a 6:57 AM train at the far north end of the green line. It took about an hour to get the MKL station. Cost was $2 for parking and $4 per ticket x2.. Total cost $10.
I could have driven it in about 35 minutes at that time of day via the back way in.
Securer Fair Park parking was $15. Other reasonable nearby parking was $22. + gasoline money for the extra driving.
We stayed until the OU players left the field.
On the way out we waited on a train for about 10 to 15 minutes. It took about an hour and 10 minutes to make our way back to the north end of the green line.
Using the back way out I could have driven this distance in less than ½ the time… if we would have parked in the $22 dollar lot.
Dart rail is probably ok if you are staying Saturday night, particularly if its downtown. But since we usually drive back after the game saving the time is more important… so I am probably done with Dart rail on OU Texas week end.
PS: What Dallas is doing on post 10 of this thread makes OKC’s recent I-40 project look like child’s play...
We need to think in much bolder ways with regard to our transportation in our area.
I used to take MARTA from Perimeter Mall to the airport even though I could drive it faster. The reason - the chance of being rear-ended by an inattentive drive was close to 0 and the reduced stress was worth it for me. Park, swipe my card, get on a train, and get off right inside the terminal. Plus, no door dings on my car by parking in small airport parking space.
I agree with Kerry on this. I would much rather spend a little extra time than having to drive my car in that traffic. I've done both (especially then driving part for many, many years). The DART was much more relaxing and I was able to enjoy the entire experience much more.
I've also had a car that was damaged by "who knows?" while parked for the game.
Wow, their taking everything that people have complained about on this forum and supersized it. Lol
1. Large number of lanes(I would say its probably the widest interstate in the world if you count managed and nonmanaged lanes.)
2. Elevated expresslanes that stretch 3 miles.
3. Toll roads that increase in price until the speed is above 50mph.
I have never been intimidated by Dallas traffic.
I am basically as relaxed diving in it as I am right now but as we have gotten older it does bother my wife more and that’s the only reason why we took it.
Experience has pretty well taught me how to make my way away from the heavy OU Texas game day traffic. Knowing the back ways in and out and not being too scared to drive though some of the rougher areas really help’s on an event like this.
I can usually drive home with a quick bit to eat in about 4 hours after this game… Taking Dart delayed me by about one hour. Dart wasn’t worth the time delay…. but it wasn’t worth the cold I now have, the person sitting behind me on Dart sneezed on me.
But this is one of those deals….. If it works well for you…. keep doing it.
Took the Green line all weekend everywhere we went. It was fantastic. Longest ride was 10 minutes. Will do it all again next year.
ou48a - I suggest you stay off trains. You might also want to consider sitting in a bubble at the game
If you go to a state fair and all you catch is a cold, consider yourself lucky.
The trouble with the building of more highway traffic capacity is that traffic inevitably matches and surpasses capacity. The best analogy I have heard is traffic is like a gas that expands to the volume of its container, not a liquid that flows as it is regarded by traffic engineers.
This is why there needs to be more focus on building multiple modes of transportation. Maintain the highway infrastructure we have invested in, but shift transportation funding to those that actually relieve highway congestion.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Bookmarks