Widgets Magazine
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 59

Thread: NW 10th and 235

  1. #26

    Default Re: NW 10th and 235

    This reminds me of when I lived in Mustang near the intersection of Czech Hall Road and Highway 152. New ramps were constructed at the intersection and, when they were built, the ramps emptied out into the street and not into the crosswalks. They had to be immediately torn out and rebuilt. It makes you wonder about the common sense used by some planners or designers.

  2. #27

    Default Re: NW 10th and 235

    Quote Originally Posted by metro View Post
    Per request, I went out there today with a tape measure. 46" clearance on the north side of the pole, 50" on the south of it. I don't care what anyone says, it's a tight fit for someone in a wheelchair or motorized scooter. I'm a tall, athletic guy and just walking on one side was close enough, not to mention do we want to make people in a wheelchair have to barely squeeze through and hit it at just the right angle. Stupid IMO.

    Steve, feel free to post these on your blog or send to the city, just give me credit for the photos (although bad quality).

    Agree completely (and thanks for the pics)!

    Just a thought and although it would still look stupid, think how much added clearance there would be if the support base had been made flush with the ramp (instead of raised).

  3. #28

    Default Re: NW 10th and 235

    i still don't see a big problem .. maybe its not ideal but .. over 4 feet on one side and almost 4 on the other .. is plenty enough space ...

  4. Default Re: NW 10th and 235

    Quote Originally Posted by BoulderSooner View Post
    i still don't see a big problem .. maybe its not ideal but .. over 4 feet on one side and almost 4 on the other .. is plenty enough space ...
    +5

  5. Default Re: NW 10th and 235

    Quote Originally Posted by OKCMallen View Post
    +5
    -6

  6. #31

    Default Re: NW 10th and 235

    Quote Originally Posted by BoulderSooner View Post
    i still don't see a big problem .. maybe its not ideal but .. over 4 feet on one side and almost 4 on the other .. is plenty enough space ...
    Because just OK is good enough.....

  7. #32

    Default Re: NW 10th and 235

    Quote Originally Posted by metro View Post
    Because just OK is good enough.....
    Good thing we didn't have the same thought with the Ford Center, huh?

  8. #33

    Default Re: NW 10th and 235

    Quote Originally Posted by Larry OKC View Post
    Good thing we didn't have the same thought with the Ford Center, huh?
    They kinda did.
    Fixed it later though <VBG>

  9. Default Re: NW 10th and 235

    They should be saving all of these poles-in-the-middle-of-sidewalks for South Robinson, where it would actually have a semi-constructive use. Just ask bbates.

  10. #35

    Default Re: NW 10th and 235

    Quote Originally Posted by kevinpate View Post
    They kinda did.
    Fixed it later though <VBG>


    Now, now...we were told repeatedly the Ford was state of the art and other glowing terms...but that aside, I was talking about the attitude of it being good enough, the improvements wouldn't have been voted in. 'Cause the City insisted the improvements were needed anyway, NBA or no NBA.

  11. #36

    Default Re: NW 10th and 235

    Quote Originally Posted by Spartan View Post
    They should be saving all of these poles-in-the-middle-of-sidewalks for South Robinson, where it would actually have a semi-constructive use. Just ask bbates.
    <<rimshot>>

  12. #37

    Default Re: NW 10th and 235

    Quote Originally Posted by okclee View Post
    ... We really have a pathetic sidewalk system unless you are at NW 164 & Western or Memorial and Penn.

    Why is it that the places that need sidewalks and crosswalk the most have the least, and the areas that use them the least have the most?
    Apparently lots of streets are going to get sidewalks,maybe, eventually, sometime, judging from all the orphaned ramps that have been built on corners on MacArthur, May, etc.

  13. #38

    Default Re: NW 10th and 235

    Quote Originally Posted by sidburgess View Post
    I don't the dispute with the pole is technical accessible. Again, it is technically sufficient for a car to squeeze down an 8' road, but if we started to build roads that way tomorrow, there would be a lot of upset people.

    To me, it is no different than : Urban Review SLT

    or swamplot

    and here in OKC: OKC Central

    It just doesn't make for a healthy urban environment. Since this is an area we are all hoping will grow with development, it is sad to see a lack of resolve to do it right.
    It is one thing to leave traffic light and telephone poles if it were already installed but speed limit signs and no parking polls, ah.

  14. #39

    Default Re: NW 10th and 235

    Quote Originally Posted by TheTravellers View Post
    Apparently lots of streets are going to get sidewalks,maybe, eventually, sometime, judging from all the orphaned ramps that have been built on corners on MacArthur, May, etc.
    Yes, as previously discussed many times, OKC passed a GO Bond Issue in 2007 that includes almost a BILLION dollars of new road and sidewalk construction and repaving. Also we were about to get sued by the Feds by not being ADA compliant. Additionally MAPS 3 includes a few million for sidewalks.

  15. #40

    Default Re: NW 10th and 235

    Why does it seem that Okc is starting sidewalk work from the outside edges of the metro working their way in?

    It seems there are more new sidewalks on the outer fringes of the city than there are inner city i.e NW164th, SW 119th.

  16. Default Re: NW 10th and 235

    Are sidewalks now part of a requirement when you build new in the city? I've come to that assumption (maybe wrong though). If so, then that would explain why it seems the outer fringes have more sidewalk development than the inner-city, as they primarily have a lot of new development. The inner-city has been getting sidewalks though also, and the core of the city already has sidewalks in place, albeit mostly worn and torn. I think sidewalk replacement should be prioritized on the inner-southside and northside where a lot of people walk regardless the lack of sidewalks.

  17. #42

    Default Re: NW 10th and 235

    Quote Originally Posted by okclee View Post
    Why does it seem that Okc is starting sidewalk work from the outside edges of the metro working their way in?

    It seems there are more new sidewalks on the outer fringes of the city than there are inner city i.e NW164th, SW 119th.
    Yes and no.

    Believe they changed city codes a few years ago that required sidewalks in new development (since most of those are in outlying areas, that adds to the perception). Sidewalks are part of the 2007 bond issue whenever street widening is called for (think most of the that is non-core as well). Then as others have mentioned, MAPS 3 has $10M for sidewalks that may be missed in the bond issue (geared more towards public places like libraries, schools etc).

    on edit: mostly what Architect2010 posted :-)

  18. #43

    Default Re: NW 10th and 235

    Quote Originally Posted by metro View Post
    Yes, as previously discussed many times, OKC passed a GO Bond Issue in 2007 that includes almost a BILLION dollars of new road and sidewalk construction and repaving. Also we were about to get sued by the Feds by not being ADA compliant. Additionally MAPS 3 includes a few million for sidewalks.
    Thanks for the info, didn't live here between 1995 and 2009, so wasn't aware of much of anything happening here between those dates. Just strange that they'd build the curb ramps, but nothing else. Maybe that was just enough for OKC to not get sued? "See, we're ADA compliant, wheelchairs can get up to the sidewalk from the street. Yeah, there's only 2 more feet of sidewalk after the ramp, so what's your point?"

  19. #44

    Default Re: NW 10th and 235

    Quote Originally Posted by TheTravellers View Post
    Thanks for the info, didn't live here between 1995 and 2009, so wasn't aware of much of anything happening here between those dates. Just strange that they'd build the curb ramps, but nothing else. Maybe that was just enough for OKC to not get sued? "See, we're ADA compliant, wheelchairs can get up to the sidewalk from the street. Yeah, there's only 2 more feet of sidewalk after the ramp, so what's your point?"
    I asked a person supervising a concrete pour on some of those awhile back and was told it was stimulus money paying for the ramps.

  20. #45

    Default Re: NW 10th and 235

    Quote Originally Posted by TheTravellers View Post
    Thanks for the info, didn't live here between 1995 and 2009, so wasn't aware of much of anything happening here between those dates. Just strange that they'd build the curb ramps, but nothing else. Maybe that was just enough for OKC to not get sued? "See, we're ADA compliant, wheelchairs can get up to the sidewalk from the street. Yeah, there's only 2 more feet of sidewalk after the ramp, so what's your point?"
    Anytime they reconstruct streets and or curbs, ADA requires these ramps, sidewalks will be added as funds are available.

  21. #46

    Default Re: NW 10th and 235

    ^^^
    Now if the sidewalks CONNECT with the ramps.....

  22. #47

    Default Re: NW 10th and 235

    Lets hope.

    The ramps I was told were paid for by federal stimulus money were put in up and down Council last winter when no road improvements were being done. None have happened since either, nor have connecting sidewalks.

  23. #48

    Default Re: NW 10th and 235

    OKLAHOMA CITY – It likely comes as no surprise to most Oklahomans that federal stimulus dollars are paying for the installation of new wheelchair ramps at intersections in and around Oklahoma City and Tulsa. The surprise would be that many of these pristine ramps lead nowhere.

    http://www.newson6.com/Global/story.asp?S=11690769

  24. #49

    Default Re: NW 10th and 235

    Not really that surprising as it has been that way for years now. A few years back, they installed ramps on the corners along SW 36th (Grand Blvd). Then a couple of years later when they put in the paved trail along it, sometimes they connected, sometimes on the opposite corner and sometimes would come within a couple of feet of connecting. Someone else in another thread said it was due to different funding (federal for the ramps) but why can't someone connect the dots?!

  25. #50

    Default Re: NW 10th and 235

    Quote Originally Posted by Double Edge View Post
    OKLAHOMA CITY – It likely comes as no surprise to most Oklahomans that federal stimulus dollars are paying for the installation of new wheelchair ramps at intersections in and around Oklahoma City and Tulsa. The surprise would be that many of these pristine ramps lead nowhere.

    http://www.newson6.com/Global/story.asp?S=11690769
    Thanks for the story, it is pretty silly that they're doing this since they've actually had to demolish/cut the curb, then rebuild it with a ramp at a lot of intersections since they just did a quick strip-and-overlay on the street and didn't do anything to the sidewalks. Oh well....

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. I-235 / I-44 Interchange
    By SSEiYah in forum Transportation
    Replies: 2313
    Last Post: 01-04-2024, 05:50 AM
  2. I-235 N Harrison exit closing/changing to 10th St exit this year
    By BoulderSooner in forum Transportation
    Replies: 62
    Last Post: 09-08-2015, 03:46 PM
  3. I-44/I-235 interchange...
    By warreng88 in forum Transportation
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 02-09-2010, 01:38 PM
  4. Weekend Ramp Closure @ NE.23 at I-235
    By Keith in forum Current Events & Open Topic
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-05-2007, 05:28 PM
  5. 10th Planet
    By mranderson in forum Current Events & Open Topic
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-02-2005, 09:00 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO