Originally Posted by
soonerguru
I think the point that Mark Shannon's possibly drug-addled brain cannot comprehend is that OKC's revenue collection shortfall would have been even worse had we not passed the first and second MAPS. By investing in ourselves with MAPS III, we are building a foundation for better revenue collection in future years.
Sometimes, when things look bleak, it seems like we should all just batten down the hatches and hide. But this really isn't a good strategy.
We make do as we can to address the current shortfalls but we keep our plans for the future on track so when the economy improves, we reap the benefits. It may seem counterintuitive but it's actually a wise strategy.
OKC is going to be in so much better shape in a few years for doing this, particularly considering the fact that many other cities are going in the opposite direction.
Not to pick on Tulsa, but look at their situation compared to ours and consider the fact they haven't been investing in themselves like we have and you have your answer. Basically, Mark Shannon is advocating that we shift our strategy to the one Tulsa has been following that has led that city off the cliff. They just fired 155 police officers last week.
The irony of the police unions aligning with Shannon is so deliciously ridiculous.
Bookmarks