Widgets Magazine
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Athletic Revenue in 2011-12 By BCS Schools

  1. #1

    OU Athletic Revenue in 2011-12 By BCS Schools

    Athletic Revenue in 2011-12 By BCS Schools

    Click to view list
    Alabama and Auburn stay among 10 wealthiest athletics departments in 2011-12 | al.com

    OU shows revenue of $22.4 million more than OSU. This makes a huge difference over a long period of time.
    These figures do not include any revenue from OU’s new TV network that should add several more million to the total.

  2. #2

    Default Re: Athletic Revenue in 2011-12 By BCS Schools

    A point worth mentioning is that compared to Norman the cost of living is higher in most of these other locations. Norman is supposedly the second cheapest city in the US to live in.
    OU might get a little more bang for their bucks than most of these other places.

  3. #3

    Default Re: Athletic Revenue in 2011-12 By BCS Schools

    Texas was first, around 57 million more than OU.

    Cost of living means nothing when there is a 57 million dollar gap.

  4. Default Re: Athletic Revenue in 2011-12 By BCS Schools

    How could Penn State bring in more than OU?

  5. #5

    Default Re: Athletic Revenue in 2011-12 By BCS Schools

    Quote Originally Posted by Spartan View Post
    How could Penn State bring in more than OU?
    Beaver Stadium holds around 107,000.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Athletic Revenue in 2011-12 By BCS Schools

    Quote Originally Posted by Buffalo Bill View Post
    Beaver Stadium holds around 107,000.
    Donations and basketball revenue also impact the bottom line.

  7. #7

    Default Re: Athletic Revenue in 2011-12 By BCS Schools

    Quote Originally Posted by Bellaboo View Post
    Texas was first, around 57 million more than OU.

    Cost of living means nothing when there is a 57 million dollar gap.
    No doubt Texas is in a much better financial situation than OU.
    They have a bigger stadium, 100,500 or so, a larger and more affluent alumni base and tons more Tee shirt fans.



    PS: To be in this position is a great accomplishment for OU and it should not be over looked by its fans.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Athletic Revenue in 2011-12 By BCS Schools

    Yeah, I'm sure having crappy basketball teams really didn't help that much. Excuse me, having the NBA in Oklahoma really doesn't help the collegiate programs...

  9. #9

    Default Re: Athletic Revenue in 2011-12 By BCS Schools

    Quote Originally Posted by ou48A View Post
    No doubt Texas is in a much better financial situation than OU.
    They have a bigger stadium, 105,000 or so, a larger and more affluent alumni base and tons more Tee shirt fans.
    Plus UT makes a small profit through licensing fees from every OU fan that has the upside down chromed longhorn thingy or window sticker.

  10. #10

    Default Re: Athletic Revenue in 2011-12 By BCS Schools

    Quote Originally Posted by Buffalo Bill View Post
    Plus UT makes a small profit through licensing fees from every OU fan that has the upside down chromed longhorn thingy or window sticker.
    Yep, they sure do.
    It’s something that I have never understood.

  11. #11

    Default Re: Athletic Revenue in 2011-12 By BCS Schools

    When did an upside longhorn become the support OU sign anyhow? I freaking cringe every time I see that crap. OU IS NOT DEFINED BY UT. We aren't the Anti-TU University. If you are doing that at any other time than inside the Cotton Bowl in October - stop it! If your friends are doing that tell them to stop it also.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Athletic Revenue in 2011-12 By BCS Schools

    Quote Originally Posted by Just the facts View Post
    When did an upside longhorn become the support OU sign anyhow? I freaking cringe every time I see that crap. OU IS NOT DEFINED BY UT. We aren't the Anti-TU University. If you are doing that at any other time than inside the Cotton Bowl in October - stop it! If your friends are doing that tell them to stop it also.
    Unfortunately, you don't speak for our mouthbreathing, knuckledragging fans, who understand nothing about OU in general.

  13. #13

    Default Re: Athletic Revenue in 2011-12 By BCS Schools

    Quote Originally Posted by Just the facts View Post
    When did an upside longhorn become the support OU sign anyhow? I freaking cringe every time I see that crap. OU IS NOT DEFINED BY UT. We aren't the Anti-TU University. If you are doing that at any other time than inside the Cotton Bowl in October - stop it! If your friends are doing that tell them to stop it also.

    Personally I am more concerned about how OSU uses about 7 million state tax dollars to help fund its athletic programs.
    Our limited resources have far more urgent needs in our state.

  14. #14

    Default Re: Athletic Revenue in 2011-12 By BCS Schools

    Quote Originally Posted by Buffalo Bill View Post
    Plus UT makes a small profit through licensing fees from every OU fan that has the upside down chromed longhorn thingy or window sticker.
    My next door neighbor is a judge who is a UT alum, he told me that the UT alumni association gets $1 for each longhorn sticker sold, so everyone keep buying them, so he says.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 2011 BCS Discussion Thread
    By venture in forum Sports
    Replies: 127
    Last Post: 11-28-2011, 12:24 AM
  2. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-13-2011, 01:12 AM
  3. Golds Gym buy's Aspen Athletic
    By ExtremistPullup in forum Current Events & Open Topic
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 02-25-2011, 03:44 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO