Re: Will Oklahoma City offer the Sonics a free lease while Key Arena deal exists?
Yep, I agree Malibu.
Obviously, Bennett is wanting to set up a meeting with the city of Seattle do develop the terms of the buyout of the lease. I think at first the city might have a defensive posture - but if Bennett were to make them an offer they can't refuse - ie keep the Supersonics name and rent paid thru the 2010 season, I seriously doubt the city will refuse that OR take Bennett to court.
A court battle would surely result in a win for Bennett. Unlike the other two teams, the sonics lease at Key Arena sucks. When you think in legal terms, it does not offer Equitable Consideration for the Sonics - other than they are the top tenant during the lease. There are no provisions for the city to assist the team to break even nor will the city offer to do so to keep the Sonics here.
The City knows they HOOKED the Sonics and like you said, there's only 2 years left on the lease - so why not let Bennett out easy? Especially since the city has a no-win clause for pro sports and the state will NOT make public funds available prior to Bennett's Oct 31 deadline.
Legally, Bennett will win because of the UNFAIR lease. How/Why should a business be obligated to continue to lose money on an unfair and unequitable agreement that was reached under past ownership and past conditions. Sorry, but times change and the city aint offering anything to balance the tables.
Honestly, I bet Bennett could move IMMEDIATELY and not even play in 2007 if he wanted to. There is NOTHING that holds him to play in Seattle for 2007. He ONLY said he'd try to work something out with the state/city thru Oct 31.
Perhaps a split season would be better than a lame duck for 2007/2008 (with OKC getting them in Jan 2008). This IS possible!! (could be probable).
Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!
Bookmarks