Just an off the wall take here, I am happy with being wrong on this, but does anyone else wish the venue were a bit smaller? Clearly I'm being picky, but I'm talking more 6-8k seats instead of 12k. Thoughts?
Just an off the wall take here, I am happy with being wrong on this, but does anyone else wish the venue were a bit smaller? Clearly I'm being picky, but I'm talking more 6-8k seats instead of 12k. Thoughts?
The sun cover doesn't seem made to block the sun but instead are there for rain. Those coverings look semi-transparent. Additionally, the stage is on the south side of the property, which means we might always be looking into the sun while sitting in the seats, no matter the season.
The surest give-away that the stage is very far from most the seats is the addition of huge video screens; they are much smaller in the original renderings.
I mentioned before that I've been to Shoreline in Mountain View and it was a complete waste of time. Our group spent the entire night watching the video screen and very few around us were paying attention at all. It really, really sucked.
The Hollywood and Santa Barbara Bowls are both fantastic though because the slope is quite steep, bringing most seats pretty close to the stage. Without an existing hillside, there is no way to get the seats close; I bet the pitch ends up like the zoo. Also, a true bowl captures the sound. The acoustics at both places are fantastic, as is the setting of course.
If I was going to a concert here, I would either buy seats at the very front or not bother with the expense and hassle.
Most modern amphitheaters are like this, though. Dos Equis in Dallas, Cynthia Woods in The Woodlands, Xfinity Theater in Hartford, RV Inn Style Resorts Amp in Ridgefield, WA, USANA Amp in Salt Lake. I agree, most shows won't be worth the hassle, unless you really like the band, But getting those shows these venues get that skip OKC because we can't fit 10k in the amphitheater will be big for people who truly love live music, regardless of seeing the stage (of which there are plenty).
I am biased, because I have been to all of those venues, and while ours won't be perfect, it will give us something very similar to those, and will get the shows that skip over OKC that I have to travel to Dallas or Houston for (mostly rock and metal shows).
https://www.livenation.com/venue/Kov...avilion-events
Yeah, Gilford, NH shouldn't be having shows like this, and our city has none.
https://www.livenation.com/venue/Kov...theatre-events
Same with Birmingham, AL.
It isn't that these venues are just crazy booked, but they have shows already lined up, whereas the Zoo Amp has nothing.
https://waltonartscenter.org/AMP/
Now, for a venue that is packed with events already, look about 3 hours to our northeast, Walmart AMP is loaded already. They are not more hip or happening than OKC, yet because they have a venue that gets close to that 10k threshold, they have like, 20 shows already booked.
Either that, or the Zoo Amp sucks at booking shows.
^
At Shoreline it was the B-52s and I've seen them 3-4 times and always loved them.
But not in Mountain View; way too far away and impossible to hear well.
As expensive as concerts are, I want to be very sure I have good seats, especially at venues like this. Equally true for U2 at Dodger Stadium. I was right behind home plate but Bono was almost to the centerfield fence. Terrible, terrible concert very expensive and you can imagine the horror when 40,000 people all try to leave at once in L.A. I'm still scarred by that experience.
The cover is a great addition, but asking investors to pony up to $100K to "own" one of those firepit suites that are a mile from the stage is just insane. They might want to rethink that.
Just remembered I saw Depeche Mode at the Starplex in Dallas during their Violator tour, absolutely the height of their popularity.
It was summer and there was a roof on the venue and it was *miserable*. I had good seats but ended up leaving before the encore because the conditions were insanely uncomfortable.
I also remember being at a Rangers game in the middle of the summer and by 11PM it was still like 95 outside. This is why they threw away a relatively new stadium and built a dome.
On the opposite end of the spectrum, I saw the Dodgers in August in the late 80s and the woman at the hotel desk said, "You'd better take a jacket!" I just laughed and then was so cold by the 5th inning I had to bail. It had been sunny and mid-80s during the day, about as good as it gets in August. Right then and there, I said, out loud, "That's it -- I'm moving here". And not long after I did exactly that.
That covering looks like a big game changer compared to the Zoo. We'll see what happens as to if it give some sun relief or if it just holds the heat in. With the way it's made, it doesn't look like it would hold in the heat though (it's not solid all the way across, meaning it has areas for air to flow). But some Big Ass Fans would be a good add just to keep some air moving. It's just effing hot in Oklahoma in the summer. You need something so it's not a sweat box like the OU games.
For someone comparing this to the zoo, um...the zoo amphitheater is a grassy null that's really an afterthought. Why does this pile of turd even exist? Take it out once this new one opens, and the zoo has more land for, oh i dont know, animals! LOL. To me, it's taking this sort of thing to a more permanent and grown-up model.
Went to a Dodgers game in September of 2000 when I was in LA attending an International Downtown Association conference and was SHOCKED at how chilly it got. I mean, I also spent part of a day at the beach in Santa Monica on that trip, where it was plenty warm enough to swim.
The Zoo Amphitheater has a storied past and history!
"The Oklahoma City Zoo Amphitheater was the first and principal structure built in Oklahoma City by the civilian conservation corps. It was established to provide jobs for economic recovery during the depression and was constructed from Native Sandstone during 1935 and 1936, with workers camping near the park. The first performance was "The Circus of 21 Death-Defying Acts". Other events have included an Annual Easter Pageant, concerts, dance programs, plays, and public meetings. The Amphitheater fell into disrepair in the 1960's, but restoration efforts began in the late 1970's. The Zoo Amphitheatre has now evolved into Oklahoma City's premier live concert venue."
I saw a TV ad for this for the first time tonight for the first time. They may have been doing it for a while but it's a first for me.
Right?
It's the only venue for that size....when you're the only one, you get the 1st place trophy by default. Not exactly a "win". I really hope this new venue is a success. On the surface, it looks like a whole game changer for the user experience. I'm sure the ticket prices will reflect that new experience.
A friend told me that yesterday he saw a TV ad seeking investors for this project.
He also said Lieutenant Governor Matt Pinnell appeared and provided an endorsement.
Has anyone see this TV commercial?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks