Widgets Magazine
Page 81 of 81 FirstFirst ... 31767778798081
Results 2,001 to 2,018 of 2018

Thread: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

  1. #2001

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Who cares about office space?

    I'd rather have more retail and restaurants.

  2. Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    Who cares about office space?

    I'd rather have more retail and restaurants.
    Yep.

  3. #2003

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    Who cares about office space?

    I'd rather have more retail and restaurants.
    I guess i just look at it as more office space like that which was proposed means more white-collar jobs, which helps the economy a lot, and not just from a sales tax perspective.

    Plus, a good mix of residents, visitors and workers is what helps all of these thrive in DFW. Notice none have only 2 of those. They have all 3. Legacy has multiple office towers, so does Legacy West.

  4. Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Quote Originally Posted by bison34 View Post
    I guess i just look at it as more office space like that which was proposed means more white-collar jobs, which helps the economy a lot, and not just from a sales tax perspective.

    Plus, a good mix of residents, visitors and workers is what helps all of these thrive in DFW. Notice none have only 2 of those. They have all 3. Legacy has multiple office towers, so does Legacy West.
    A ton of white collar jobs no longer have large office spaces. They have lots of people working remotely. Dallas has been that way for a long time and it will likely see a decline in Office buildings. I feel like the location being close to major highways and neighborhoods will help with the mix.

  5. #2005

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    For OKC to thrive, we need businesses of all types and at all levels. It's fantastic and needed and applause-worthy for us to get new-to-market, high-end retail. I am a huge fan of what I am seeing online about OAK.

    That said, it doesn't have to be on that corner, but I do care about office space. Some businesses are remote but others are not. OKC needs Class A availability (The Registry Building almost certainly wasn't) in prime locations because of the "flight to quality" that is happening across commercial real estate. White collar jobs are going to pay more than almost any retail or restaurant job and will provide the customer base for said retail and restaurants.

  6. Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    maybe they are replacing the turfed areas with pavers. that would be a super nice touch.

  7. #2007

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Quote Originally Posted by stlokc View Post
    For OKC to thrive, we need businesses of all types and at all levels. It's fantastic and needed and applause-worthy for us to get new-to-market, high-end retail. I am a huge fan of what I am seeing online about OAK.

    That said, it doesn't have to be on that corner, but I do care about office space. Some businesses are remote but others are not. OKC needs Class A availability (The Registry Building almost certainly wasn't) in prime locations because of the "flight to quality" that is happening across commercial real estate. White collar jobs are going to pay more than almost any retail or restaurant job and will provide the customer base for said retail and restaurants.
    Exactly. This wasn't me bashing OAK, at all. I love what they have done, and can't wait for RH to open!

  8. #2008

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    At the current time, there is a big over-supply of office space, including Class A.

    And anything built new is going to be very expensive to rent, so it makes zero economic sense from a development and lending standpoint.

  9. #2009

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    At the current time, there is a big over-supply of office space, including Class A.

    And anything built new is going to be very expensive to rent, so it makes zero economic sense from a development and lending standpoint.
    the only new office i think we are going to see (in general) .. is Owner built and occupied ..

  10. #2010

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Quote Originally Posted by bison34 View Post
    I guess i just look at it as more office space like that which was proposed means more white-collar jobs, which helps the economy a lot, and not just from a sales tax perspective.

    Plus, a good mix of residents, visitors and workers is what helps all of these thrive in DFW. Notice none have only 2 of those. They have all 3. Legacy has multiple office towers, so does Legacy West.
    I agree, any good mixed use development needs office space. Office space provides constant traffic of workers during the week that will fuel retail and restaurants in the development.

  11. #2011

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Not that I have any insider info at all, but I wonder if they are abandoning the office concept because they are trying to acquire 50 Penn...

  12. #2012

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Quote Originally Posted by bison34 View Post
    Would stink to lose that office building, as I think in-office workers would help those restaurants during the day. But I think they would also have no trouble finding quality retail tenants to take its place.
    The office building phase was probably long dead. That is why they put a parking lot where it was supposed to be, lol.

  13. #2013

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    I had recently asked the same question regarding the office tower and it is part of the next phase or Phase II. (Per Pete’s response)

  14. #2014

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Looking at the Oklahoma County assessor, OAK also owns the following properties:

    2217 NW 50th
    2221 NW 50th
    2225 NW 50th
    2237 NW 50th
    2232 NW 52nd
    2248 NW 52nd
    2257 NW 52nd
    2301 NW 52nd
    5100 N Youngs
    5110 N Youngs
    5114 N Youngs

    I think Pete did a map a while ago that highlighted what they own and don't, but this is just the start.

    And those are just to the west of the development. If they decide not to do office now because the market isn't goo enough, it looks like they are trying to acquire more properties to continue this thing so it's not like it couldn't happen in the future.

  15. Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Quote Originally Posted by G.Walker View Post
    I agree, any good mixed use development needs office space. Office space provides constant traffic of workers during the week that will fuel retail and restaurants in the development.
    I guarantee there will be people that live in those apartments that work from home and will give this space constant traffic. There are office buildings close by that will fuel the area. It is not on an island, it is built inside of an already busy retail and office space area.

  16. Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Quote Originally Posted by warreng88 View Post
    Looking at the Oklahoma County assessor, OAK also owns the following properties:

    2217 NW 50th
    2221 NW 50th
    2225 NW 50th
    2237 NW 50th
    2232 NW 52nd
    2248 NW 52nd
    2257 NW 52nd
    2301 NW 52nd
    5100 N Youngs
    5110 N Youngs
    5114 N Youngs

    I think Pete did a map a while ago that highlighted what they own and don't, but this is just the start.

    And those are just to the west of the development. If they decide not to do office now because the market isn't goo enough, it looks like they are trying to acquire more properties to continue this thing so it's not like it couldn't happen in the future.
    This is the most likely to happen. If we ever do see an increase in Office Space needed, they have plenty of room to expand and build.

  17. #2017

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Quote Originally Posted by G.Walker View Post
    The office building phase was probably long dead. That is why they put a parking lot where it was supposed to be, lol.
    As I've stated many times and dozens of plans have shown, the parking lot was always meant to be temporary.

  18. #2018

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Pete, do you have any indication if the three stand-alone restaurants would be new to market places? Maybe a Maggiano's? Will Hopdoddy make a comeback to the OKC market? Maybe a second Pappadeaux's location already?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 9 users browsing this thread. (3 members and 6 guests)

  1. warreng88,
  2. catcherinthewry,
  3. dankrutka

Similar Threads

  1. NW Corner of 63rd & Penn
    By Pete in forum Development & Buildings
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-22-2014, 11:50 AM
  2. SE Corner of NW 23 and Penn
    By jpeaceokc in forum Development & Buildings
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 08-03-2013, 08:27 PM
  3. SE Corner of Hefner and Penn?
    By soonermike81 in forum General Real Estate Topics
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 08-24-2012, 07:44 PM
  4. SE Corner of NW 150th and Penn
    By diesel in forum General Real Estate Topics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-16-2010, 07:34 PM
  5. Penn Square/50 Penn Place update
    By Patrick in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 05-17-2007, 05:59 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO