The Big 10 would never take K-State or WV, as both have bad academics.
I'm not sure the Pac 12 would take the others for the same reason and in the case of TCU and especially Baylor, their religious ties.
The Big 10 would never take K-State or WV, as both have bad academics.
I'm not sure the Pac 12 would take the others for the same reason and in the case of TCU and especially Baylor, their religious ties.
These are the latest academic rankings by US News:
I dunno, I think the days of choosing schools because of academics are past us. The big 10 added Rutgers and Maryland and while yes they are good academic schools, to me the actually devalued the perceptive brand of the big 10. I think Nebraska helped but holy crap they are terrible now.
Look at the numbers above; Maryland and Rutgers are both excellent state universities and when the Big 10 admitted Nebraska they were still part of the AAU.
The Pac took lowly Oregon St. and Washington St. because of the package deal with U of Oregon and U-dub.
Academics do matter to conferences except the Big 12 and maybe the SEC.
After OU and UT go to the SEC there will be 8 teams left in the Big12 and 8 openings total in the ACC, Big10 and PAC12 if they want to create 4 16 team conferences. Doesn't it seem logical that the conferences will somehow make that happen?
Also just saw on ESPN that the PAC12 has stated that they are "Interested in taking in new members".
My best guess:
KU and ISU to the Big Ten
OSU, Tech, TCU, K-State to the Pac-12
WVU and Cincy to the ACC
Baylor to the AAC
Given the even bigger power of the SEC if this comes to pass, the other conferences are going to have to step up.
^
Big 12 was lucky to get to 10 after the 4 schools left.
Took TCU and West Virginia which are both pretty weak.
The conference has been on life support for some time.
OU would not be last in any of those other conferences except tied with Nebraska. For that mater Kansas wouldn't be last in any, and Kansas State would only be last in the Big 10. Just saying almost everybody has worse members that are already there.
I suspect conferences will shift into a different mode if OU & Texas join the SEC and start adding schools they wouldn't normally admit.
Big Ten won’t take them due to geography. Pac-12 won’t take them due to their overtly religious profile (as opposed to TCU which is mostly a religious school in name only). It’ll all depend on whether or not they can make a better impression on the ACC than Cincinnati, IMO. I actually tend to think Baylor would do fine in the AAC. They’d likely continue to be a basketball powerhouse and would also stand to go 9-3 or better in football most years. And I personally don’t have much ill will against Baylor now after they cleaned house back in 2016. Enjoyed seeing them win March Madness a few months back. Just stating what I feel is the most likely outcome. The main reason Baylor got into the Big XII in the first place was due to having a lot of influence in Texas politics back in the mid-90’s, and that influence is much less now.
US News rankings are not very reliable.
What the BIG 10 cares about is AAU membership. Nebraska is the only school in the BIG 10 that isn't a member, and when they were a AAU member when they moved but lost membership soon after. The only AAU members in the Big 12 are Texas, KU and ISU.
https://www.aau.edu/who-we-are/our-members
I’m usually very bad at this stuff, but here’s my guess:
OU and Tex to the SEC
KU and ISU to the Big Ten
OSU and Tech to the Pac-12
WVU and Baylor to the AAC
TCU to Sunbelt
KSU to MAC
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)
Bookmarks