Originally Posted by
dankrutka
I don't have any qualms with the Littrell criticism, but your Littrell story is mostly OU fan fiction rage. Littrell took a moribund UNT program and led them to more success they'd had in a long time. A lot of it happened when Oklahoman Mason Fine was the QB. Littrell was fired because UNT couldn't win bowl games, but before Littrell was there, UNT didn't make bowl games. Littrell also had offensive success as the offensive coordinator at Indiana and North Carolina. He has a track record. So, it's fine to think Littrell is doing a poor job, particularly due to the lack of execution, but you don't have to make stuff up to make the argument.
Personally, I think it's hard to fully evaluate Littrell considering (a) Arnold seems to possibly be a bust (he wasn't a Littrell recruit), (b) the offensive line lacks talent and is deeply injured (much of this blame lands with Bedebaugh), and (c) the injuries at wide receiver are devastating (only 1 of the top 5 WRs remains). I don't think the play calls have been the problem (unless you want to argue that it requires too much for Arnold to evaluate on plays), but the execution has been bad. The only hope is that (a) Hawkins can be better, (b) the offensive line gets healthier and is able to develop some cohesion and continuity, and (c) some young WRs like Pettaway step up. I definitely don't think firing Littrell during the season would serve any purpose, especially considering there's no logical heir to take over the offense.
Bookmarks