Widgets Magazine
Page 55 of 71 FirstFirst ... 55051525354555657585960 ... LastLast
Results 1,351 to 1,375 of 1756

Thread: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

  1. #1351

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Quote Originally Posted by foodiefan View Post
    . . little bit further West (Meridian), but love this whole are is experiencing a resurgence!!
    Little bit further east (Western) but ditto!

  2. #1352

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Quote Originally Posted by chssooner View Post
    I just hate that this is so limited, size-wise.
    The limited plot is also an asset, preventing another sprawling development. Instead this will be dense and walkable. Bigger often is worse.

  3. #1353

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Totally agree. I think you can draw an arc from Oak to Penn Square to Classen Curve to Nichols Hills Plaza, Whole Foods area and the boutiques on Western and really see this entire 2-3 square mile area becoming the premier shopping destination in the state.

    I'd love to imagine what the area could have been if they had also somehow been able to also repurpose the old plant and lake instead of putting that cut-rate strip mall in its place. But, but, but, I'm not going to gripe too badly about that. It's looking better every day and feeling more "big city."

  4. #1354

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Quote Originally Posted by Ginkasa View Post
    Little bit further east (Western) but ditto!
    In the middle (May/36th), double ditto!

  5. #1355

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    I will be sparing no expense at Tommy Bahama. I love their stuff

  6. #1356

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Quote Originally Posted by dankrutka View Post
    The limited plot is also an asset, preventing another sprawling development. Instead this will be dense and walkable. Bigger often is worse.
    I am more thinking Legacy West sized. That is insane, and I wish OKC could have something that size. Not bashing the development, at all. It is killing it!

  7. #1357

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    I just hope it doesn't "kill" Penn Square.

  8. Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    ^^^^^^^^
    It’s likely to bolster sales at PSM, so long as they pay attention to maintaining the property and its tenant mix. PSM is an outlier when it comes to enclosed malls; still a highly-performing property while the industry itself struggles mightily. In this case, retail density is a GOOD thing.

  9. #1359

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Poor PSM has never really gotten a ton of love from Simon. I wish this could help, but I doubt Simon cares that much.

  10. #1360

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Quote Originally Posted by dankrutka View Post
    The limited plot is also an asset, preventing another sprawling development. Instead this will be dense and walkable. Bigger often is worse.
    This. This. This. Limited spaces will create demand for those spaces. Too much room could cause developers to bring in lower-quality stuff just to fill space.

  11. #1361

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    On the space conversation: it's much more important for things to be built to last for 100+ years than it is to have a bunch of space to build on. Look how much Chisolm Creek has "struggled" to put together their ambitious plan with all the space they have. Not so much trying to dog on Chisolm Creek as I am showing just how incredibly well thought out and executed this development is and how it has come together so quickly in comparison. Not having a lot of room to play with actually provides the kind of limits that are sometimes necessary to move forward. The office tower adjustment is a great example: it largely looks the same and was only slightly moved around but it fits very cleanly with the plan and they're moving forward with it.

    And the rest of the area will only continue to take off. There is:

    1. All of the surface parking both at PSM and Belle Isle that will eventually become too big of an opportunity cost not to develop.

    2. The group that's been collecting properties south of NWX and west of Classen that could coalesce in the 2030s (and potentially earlier, especially if Oak is as successful as we think it will be).

    3. Tons of single story infrastructure that is at least 20 years old and could be easily torn down over the next 10-15 years for higher and better use.

    4. Talks of burying I-44, which could also be capped to open development space/opportunity.

    It's not going to be Manhattan in 20 years, but there's no way if this Oak is successful that this area doesn't get increased investment. The best example is probably the Galleria area in Houston which is similarly distanced from downtown and built around a retail hub with some major office around the area (mainly 50 Penn & Valliance Bank). That's a super nice area of Houston.

  12. #1362

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    This is great, I can honestly say the core of Oklahoma City is swelling, and thats a good thing. Traffic is crazy, no parking downtown, pedestrians everywhere downtown, restraunts are full, apartments are full, construction everwhere.

  13. #1363

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Quote Originally Posted by G.Walker View Post
    This is great, I can honestly say the core of Oklahoma City is swelling, and thats a good thing. Traffic is crazy, no parking downtown, pedestrians everywhere downtown, restraunts are full, apartments are full, construction everwhere.
    Traffic is crazy?

  14. #1364

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Quote Originally Posted by LakeEffect View Post
    Traffic is crazy?
    OKC traffic is not close to being at DFW, Austin, or Denver levels yet, but surface streets in the core are noticeably busier than they were back in, say, 2018-19.

  15. #1365

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Quote Originally Posted by SEMIweather View Post
    OKC traffic is not close to being at DFW, Austin, or Denver levels yet, but surface streets in the core are noticeably busier than they were back in, say, 2018-19.
    Depends on where you are, I imagine, but when checking the 2023 or 2022 counts against history, most surface streets in the core are still lower than pre-pandemic. Traffic in the core on surface streets peaked around 2017... It's fascinating to look at the flow of traffic around the core and how it's changed.

    https://acog.public.ms2soft.com/tcds...?loc=Acog&mod=

  16. #1366

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Quote Originally Posted by LakeEffect View Post
    Depends on where you are, I imagine, but when checking the 2023 or 2022 counts against history, most surface streets in the core are still lower than pre-pandemic. Traffic in the core on surface streets peaked around 2017... It's fascinating to look at the flow of traffic around the core and how it's changed.

    https://acog.public.ms2soft.com/tcds...?loc=Acog&mod=
    This is fantastic, thank you for providing data to refute my anecdote. Didn't even know this website existed and currently having a lot of fun playing around with it.

  17. Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Pete-
    Do we any updates to what the rent prices be for the apts?

  18. #1368

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Quote Originally Posted by Plutonic Panda View Post
    I will be sparing no expense at Tommy Bahama. I love their stuff
    I am excited about this concept too! Love his coastal look in clothes. The bar looks very cool too!

  19. #1369

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Quote Originally Posted by soonerguru View Post
    Great announcements!

    I was holding out hope for Crate and Barrel but it's hard to imagine them adding that now given all of the other home goods stores in the mix.
    I could still see C&B in this development. Really like this store! Let's hold our breath.

  20. #1370
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    10,286
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    So nice to see the construction and continued growth of OKC. Lots of new stores and shops a the OAK.

  21. #1371

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Quote Originally Posted by Urbanized View Post
    ^^^^^^^^
    It’s likely to bolster sales at PSM, so long as they pay attention to maintaining the property and its tenant mix. PSM is an outlier when it comes to enclosed malls; still a highly-performing property while the industry itself struggles mightily. In this case, retail density is a GOOD thing.
    I'd love to see PSM respond to OAK by building on surface parking with some density at the closest corner to OAK that visually connects the developments together in a walkable area. Even if it's just a parking garage wrapped with some retail.

    Generally, I've always wanted to see a mall, any mall (or Lloyd Noble Center), build mixed use developments on the surface parking (I'll accept the parking garages built in) around malls to turn them into a walkable communities... which was the original plan for malls.

  22. Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    I wonder if OAK may also encourage PS to look at adding a high-density housing component on unused parts of the property?

  23. #1373

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    Quote Originally Posted by dankrutka View Post
    I'd love to see PSM respond to OAK by building on surface parking with some density at the closest corner to OAK that visually connects the developments together in a walkable area. Even if it's just a parking garage wrapped with some retail.

    Generally, I've always wanted to see a mall, any mall (or Lloyd Noble Center), build mixed use developments on the surface parking (I'll accept the parking garages built in) around malls to turn them into a walkable communities... which was the original plan for malls.
    Simon has done that with dozens of their malls since 2000 However, PSM has gotten minimal investment from Simon (aside from a new entrance or 2), so it would be great if they finally invested in PSM, but I won't be holding my breath.

  24. #1374

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    I think our best case scenario for building on the SW corner is PSM is someone coming in to buy it and develop it and PSM using that money to build a larger parking garage.

  25. #1375

    Default Re: OAK (formerly Penn Central)

    I am pretty excited to have Williams Sonoma back in the city! I tend to prefer it over Sur la Table.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. NW Corner of 63rd & Penn
    By Pete in forum Development & Buildings
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-22-2014, 11:50 AM
  2. SE Corner of NW 23 and Penn
    By jpeaceokc in forum Development & Buildings
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 08-03-2013, 08:27 PM
  3. SE Corner of Hefner and Penn?
    By soonermike81 in forum General Real Estate Topics
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 08-24-2012, 07:44 PM
  4. SE Corner of NW 150th and Penn
    By diesel in forum General Real Estate Topics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-16-2010, 07:34 PM
  5. Penn Square/50 Penn Place update
    By Patrick in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 05-17-2007, 05:59 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO