Re: Population Growth for OKC
The Shawnee name in the Oklahoma City/Shawnee CSA is included because Shawnee has its own micropolitan area and the CSA is a marriage of the Oklahoma City Metropolitan Statistical area and the Shawnee Micropolitan area. I don't think Norman can stand on its own despite it having an intact central city, it is a college town that has grown up into a suburb. I honestly don't think Shawnee stands on its own either nor do I think it is an edge city that should have its own mSA, as Shawnee is also a bedroom community for OKC.
Personally, I think all of the OKC/Shawnee CSA as it is currently defined is truly the Oklahoma City metropolitan area (MSA) and that the Greater CSA should include Stillwater micropolitan area, to be the Oklahoma City/Stillwater CSA. Stillwater IS an edge city with its own mSA and stand on its own but at the same time does depend on OKC for most essential functional services including utility, governance, transportation/airport, major employment, and education (and vice versa). I think Stillwater having a slight cultural connection to Tulsa makes it a somewhat more difficult choice, but functionally the area is definitely an extension of Metro OKC (hence edge city or part of the CSA, but not MSA).
Notice that they are including now Muskogee for the Tulsa CSA (and just calling it that I believe) drastically inflating Tulsa CSA to over 1m all of sudden in the process; but one could argue that both Bartlesville and Muskogee functionally stand on their own without Tulsa (particularly Bartlesville IMO) as edge city(ies) but both are culturally connected to Tulsa.
Again, I'd like to see an Oklahoma City/Stillwater CSA to include Oklahoma City MSA (current OKC CSA definition) + Stillwater mSA. The population would be a cool 1.6M in 2012. The new OKC MSA would be 1.46M and rightfully so.
Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!
Bookmarks