According to that information (it should be pointed out that the info in that link is from '05), it sounds like the answer to that is possibly yes. By the same standard, I guess the folks at the Skirvin could probably paint over their historic wall, or re-tile their historic floor next year - five years after opening - if they chose to.
However, if a building is successfully rehabilitated to comply with the Secretary of the Interior's standards for Historic Preservation, it usually has more intrinsic value than a like, but less-historic structure. In most cases I would guess that the owners, having been through the process, would be disinclined to undo what they worked so hard to achieve. "Historic" is a commodity that is pretty limited around here, so once someone has invested in doing it right, most would not want to un-do their effort and compromise their own investment. The government is probably betting on this too, by structuring the credits in this way.
Keep in mind that those guidelines are for the federal tax credit. Oklahoma also has a state tax credit (currently under fire in the legislature) which has similar hoops to jump through and similar transfer restrictions, I'm guessing. Chip Fudge, who was involved with some revitalization in the Automobile Alley® Historic District, and who has led revitalization in Film Row, has an opinion piece in this week's Gazette that discusses the current threat to the state tax credit.
Bookmarks