Widgets Magazine
Page 45 of 93 FirstFirst ... 4041424344454647484950 ... LastLast
Results 1,101 to 1,125 of 2314

Thread: I-235 / I-44 Interchange

  1. #1101

    Default Re: I-235 / I-44 Interchange

    Quote Originally Posted by David View Post
    Gah, Broadway converted to an expressway up to 15th sounds god-awful. It's so pedestrian unfriendly as is, that would be an terrible change.
    Yeah because everything everywhere has to be pedestrian friendly. Grade separation saves lives. Edmond needs traffic relief. Not embarking on a goose chase to make six lane thoroughfares pedestrian friendly, IMO. There are plenty of other parts of the city where pedestrian oriented projects should go. Broadway south of 15th is NOT one of them.

  2. #1102

    Default Re: I-235 / I-44 Interchange

    Quote Originally Posted by catch22 View Post
    I don’t think the feds are expanding the interstate system right now. Once it has a federal designator (I-235) there’s more burden on the Feds for upkeep. I believe somewhere in Arizona has been trying for years to get a I- designator on a highway they built to federal interstate standards and has not been able to convince the feds.
    There are plenty of new routings like I-11, I-14, I-69, I-49, etc. that are being built along with various 3DIs being designated in cities. NC is on a hot streak with new interstates.

  3. #1103

    Default Re: I-235 / I-44 Interchange

    Quote Originally Posted by Plutonic Panda View Post
    Yeah because everything everywhere has to be pedestrian friendly. Grade separation saves lives. Edmond needs traffic relief. Not embarking on a goose chase to make six lane thoroughfares pedestrian friendly, IMO. There are plenty of other parts of the city where pedestrian oriented projects should go. Broadway south of 15th is NOT one of them.
    Probably not anymore of a goose chase than making it a controlled access up to 33rd or 15th for that matter. The controlled access highway ship set sail a long time ago. Imagine the expenses from ROW alone and all the businesses that have to close or shutdown. You would have better luck turning highway 9 into controlled access and that is pretty slim.

  4. #1104

    Default Re: I-235 / I-44 Interchange

    Quote Originally Posted by HOT ROD View Post
    I hope they will just brand the Broadway Extension as I-235 rather than "ending" it at I-44. Most people probably already refer to it as 235 (as in post above) and I'm sure the BE is built beyond Interstate Standards. ...
    To do that would violate AASHTO route numbering rules. A 3 digit interstate beginning with an even number has to begin and end at another interstate. However, there are exceptions made. I635's western end in Dallas is one that comes to mind. The western extension from I35 was an afterthought.

  5. #1105

    Default Re: I-235 / I-44 Interchange

    Quote Originally Posted by jn1780 View Post
    Probably not anymore of a goose chase than making it a controlled access up to 33rd or 15th for that matter. The controlled access highway ship set sail a long time ago. Imagine the expenses from ROW alone and all the businesses that have to close or shutdown. You would have better luck turning highway 9 into controlled access and that is pretty slim.
    There would have to be little to no business closures. TxDOT is able to put 8 lane freeways in ROW the size of the Broadway. A depressed freeway would do wonders. I would disagree that my plan would be more of a goose chase than one trying to make this road pedestrian friendly.

    At the very most, there might be a handful of businesses that would be impacted and most of it would be parking lots. With a depressed freeway with service lanes and tight diamond interchanges, it would work very well. But Oklahoma is cheap and this project would cost north of a billion dollars. I agree no way it happens but because Oklahoma. That is my opinion.

    At the very least, tolled over or under passes would be nice and could likely fit in the median.

  6. #1106

    Default Re: I-235 / I-44 Interchange

    Quote Originally Posted by rte66man View Post
    To do that would violate AASHTO route numbering rules. A 3 digit interstate beginning with an even number has to begin and end at another interstate. However, there are exceptions made. I635's western end in Dallas is one that comes to mind. The western extension from I35 was an afterthought.

    I-44 routed down the Kilpatrick Tollway to SH-74. Solved.

  7. #1107

    Default Re: I-235 / I-44 Interchange

    Wasn't there a plan from ODOT decades back where they wanted to turn 23rd through Midtown into an access controlled highway cutting through the city, but the city rightfully pushed back and prevented it? This access controlled broadway extension up to 15th idea feels like exactly that, turning a city street into a highway for no particularly good reason other than someone wanting to be able to drive fast on it.

  8. Default Re: I-235 / I-44 Interchange

    Quote Originally Posted by David View Post
    Wasn't there a plan from ODOT decades back where they wanted to turn 23rd through Midtown into an access controlled highway cutting through the city, but the city rightfully pushed back and prevented it? This access controlled broadway extension up to 15th idea feels like exactly that, turning a city street into a highway for no particularly good reason other than someone wanting to be able to drive fast on it.
    I recall seeing a document when I was a kid showing NE 23rd east of I-35 being upgraded to a limited access highway connecting to the east outer loop they had designed at that time down Sooner Rd. I don't recall seeing 23rd being upgraded anywhere through the mid city.

  9. #1109

    Default Re: I-235 / I-44 Interchange

    Quote Originally Posted by mugofbeer View Post
    I recall seeing a document when I was a kid showing NE 23rd east of I-35 being upgraded to a limited access highway connecting to the east outer loop they had designed at that time down Sooner Rd. I don't recall seeing 23rd being upgraded anywhere through the mid city.
    there was a plan for a inner NE loop connecting to the 44 I35 63rd area and I40 and 240 but the NE side was so against it that is was killed ... (this was a major mistake )

  10. Default Re: I-235 / I-44 Interchange

    Are you thinking of what they called the Sooner Expressway at the time that was to start at the Turner Turnpike gate and then run down Sooner Rd? The higher speed access to Sooner Rd at that interchange was the start of that project but was abandoned later. I agree, it was a mistake to stop it. I don't recall the exact route but it was to pretty much go down Sooner Rd to Norman and I-35 south of the S. Canadian River. IMO, the current east county toll Rd. is ridiculously far east to be useful to very many.

  11. Default Re: I-235 / I-44 Interchange

    Quote Originally Posted by Plutonic Panda View Post
    I-44 routed down the Kilpatrick Tollway to SH-74. Solved.
    or better yet, why not sign the Kilpatrick Turnpike as I-844 and all of Broadway up to and just beyond it at I-235 since it's claimed that way anyway.

    I'd also feel good if Hefner Parkway was signed I-144 spur.
    Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!

  12. Default Re: I-235 / I-44 Interchange

    Quote Originally Posted by HOT ROD View Post
    or better yet, why not sign the Kilpatrick Turnpike as I-844 and all of Broadway up to and just beyond it at I-235 since it's claimed that way anyway.

    I'd also feel good if Hefner Parkway was signed I-144 spur.
    Would the bouncy bridges on the west part of the Kilpatrick qualify for interstate standards?

  13. #1113

    Default Re: I-235 / I-44 Interchange

    Quote Originally Posted by David View Post
    Wasn't there a plan from ODOT decades back where they wanted to turn 23rd through Midtown into an access controlled highway cutting through the city, but the city rightfully pushed back and prevented it? This access controlled broadway extension up to 15th idea feels like exactly that, turning a city street into a highway for no particularly good reason other than someone wanting to be able to drive fast on it.
    I’m not seeing how a six lane divided road with a 50 foot median compares to 23rd in midtown

    An apples to apples comparison would be more akin to HWY 9 in Norman or NWE. This isn’t about people wanting to drive faster though they would be able to under my plan, it’s abojt moving traffic better.

  14. #1114

    Default Re: I-235 / I-44 Interchange

    Quote Originally Posted by mugofbeer View Post
    Are you thinking of what they called the Sooner Expressway at the time that was to start at the Turner Turnpike gate and then run down Sooner Rd? The higher speed access to Sooner Rd at that interchange was the start of that project but was abandoned later. I agree, it was a mistake to stop it. I don't recall the exact route but it was to pretty much go down Sooner Rd to Norman and I-35 south of the S. Canadian River. IMO, the current east county toll Rd. is ridiculously far east to be useful to very many.
    But but but wouldn’t it have been better to build for pedestrians and not cars!? LOL. I concur.

  15. #1115

    Default Re: I-235 / I-44 Interchange

    Quote Originally Posted by mugofbeer View Post
    Would the bouncy bridges on the west part of the Kilpatrick qualify for interstate standards?
    Those are being fixed by taking the old deck and beams off then replacing them correctly. They are expanding it to 6 lanes at the same time.

  16. #1116

    Default Re: I-235 / I-44 Interchange

    Project is ramping up. I-44 is now being slightly shifted in order to work on bridge piers for new I235 bridges and overpasses in median.

  17. #1117

    Default Re: I-235 / I-44 Interchange

    Quote Originally Posted by jn1780 View Post
    Project is ramping up. I-44 is now being slightly shifted in order to work on bridge piers for new I235 bridges and overpasses in median.
    Amazing with all this rain it hasn’t completely shut them down. Hoping they can get it done early for a bonus payoff. Best thing ever invented is early completion incentives. The only thing that slows down construction these days is weather or funding.

  18. #1118

    Default Re: I-235 / I-44 Interchange

    Does anyone have any idea of how long the on-ramp to I-44 from Grand is expected to be closed?

  19. #1119

    Default Re: I-235 / I-44 Interchange

    Quote Originally Posted by timothy.a.owen View Post
    Does anyone have any idea of how long the on-ramp to I-44 from Grand is expected to be closed?
    According to this, mid-June.

    https://www.ok.gov/triton/modules/ne...ticle_id=51461

    I wouldn't doubt if it is much later due to the weather. It looks like they are paving the Deep Fork Creek channel below these bridges. Hard to do that with all the water we've had.

  20. #1120

    Default Re: I-235 / I-44 Interchange

    The merge point from Broadway Extension northbound to I-44 westbound is going to be a hassle for a while. If you drive a low-to-the-ground vehicle, it's generally hard to see beyond the high grass right there anyway. Now, they've got workers' cars parked in that little island, as well as the highway patrol cars on the access road to slow people down. All that makes for a near-stop instead of a merge coming off the cloverleaf. Just a heads-up.

  21. #1121

    Default Re: I-235 / I-44 Interchange

    Overpass can't come fast enough! Probably looking at another year before that part of the project is completed.

  22. #1122

    Default Re: I-235 / I-44 Interchange

    Quote Originally Posted by turnpup View Post
    The merge point from Broadway Extension northbound to I-44 westbound is going to be a hassle for a while. If you drive a low-to-the-ground vehicle, it's generally hard to see beyond the high grass right there anyway. Now, they've got workers' cars parked in that little island, as well as the highway patrol cars on the access road to slow people down. All that makes for a near-stop instead of a merge coming off the cloverleaf. Just a heads-up.
    Plus they added more Jersey barriers that make it even harder to see when merging onto the westbound c/d lane.

  23. #1123

    Default Re: I-235 / I-44 Interchange

    SB was bad this morning. Looks like they are going to shift those lanes over to the NB side past 63rd and then shift them back right before the bridge. It was bad because they are in the process of demolishing the concrete divider.

    Interesting sequencing of construction. They will probably have both sides of the road done before they get even one of the bridges done. The rebar for the overpasses started going up too.

  24. #1124

    Default Re: I-235 / I-44 Interchange

    How long is I44 expected to remain 2 lanes? Seems like it's gonna be that way for a while.

  25. #1125

    Default Re: I-235 / I-44 Interchange

    Quote Originally Posted by jccouger View Post
    How long is I44 expected to remain 2 lanes? Seems like it's gonna be that way for a while.
    End of project or close to it. The south bound bridge is going to be the last thing to be completed and they can't build those bridge piers until existing south bound is demolished.

    So there is going to be work happening in the middle for awhile.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Weekend Ramp Closure @ NE.23 at I-235
    By Keith in forum Current Events & Open Topic
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-05-2007, 05:28 PM
  2. I-240 / I-35 Interchange
    By oudirtypop in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 02-16-2007, 02:23 PM
  3. I-240 Interchange Plans Have Major Flaws
    By JOHNINSOKC in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-18-2005, 03:11 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO