Sometimes some people try so hard to sell their ideas that they wind up making absurd statements that might appear rational to those without knowledge or experience, but they lose credibility with anyone who actually knows reality. They should just present their good ideas. JTF has good ideas and is well read and I respect him for that. I'll leave it at that.
You seriously need to re-read what he wrote. To avoid any confusion:
Stretching that to "an area comparable to the area next to the Louve" is absurd logical acrobatics. This what he really said:Originally Posted by Just the Facts
But if you're already convinced that someone always spews outlandish ideas, you're predisposed to an erroneous reading.Originally Posted by Just the Facts
I'm not defending what he said, I'm merely telling you what he said, since you demonstrated a clear misunderstanding of what is relatively easy to understand English. And seeing as this is is my first post in this thread in 2015, the only one doubling down on anything is you on your propensity to be an incorrigible and petulant poster which, by the way, several reasonable posters have publicly noted recently.
JTF was only making an example of what other places have done & how they can be implemented here. He wasn't making an exact comparison of our park & the louve. I think it was a really great idea in general.
I will also pile on, I've basically completely ignored Rover's postings for the last few months ever since he's gone on his JTF tirade. Not that my opinion matters much, as I'm a below par poster myself .
Don't sell yourself short, Judge. You're a tremendous slouch.![]()
Okay, I'm confused now. The new park will be modeled after the Louvre and will include rovers with jumbotrons that give us just the facts?
Come on, now...we can like or dislike anybody all we want, but do we really have to announce it as if it'll make a difference?
For all of those who are offended by my counterpoints, to JFT or to anyone, I apologize. I think I take all this too seriously. I am slow to realize that this is merely an open discussion board and there are apparently no wrong statements or ideas....mine, or anyone else's. People are free to believe whatever they want and interpret things however they want...I get it. There are those on here that I think bring great insight, perspective, context and solid information and I appreciate reading those posts. I hope everyone on here realizes who those people are and the value of what they bring. It is not my place to tell you who they are, so everyone is smart enough to figure it out, or not.
But this thread isn't about me. It is just about dreaming about a new park. So, I will excuse myself and not make comments unless they are positive...unless I just can't help myself.![]()
I think the building would be a great police station to monitor the park from. It is positioned to oversee much of the open area. Could make the park safer.
Or, it could be a great first aid building.
Or, it could be a place to rent skateboards or sell kites, or other things to be enjoyed in the park.
Or use it on weekends as a kids market. I was just in Canada in a small town where on the weekend in the market in the park a part of the market was set aside for kids to bring things they make, etc., to sell. It was fun to see all the kids trying to sell things like homemade post cards, wrist bands, puppets, etc.
Or as an off track betting parlor for the fathers to hang out in while the kids play in the park.
Or as an uber/taxi station. There is no parking at the park.
There is parking at the park... But not a lot of it. There will be on-street parking, as shown in the presentation to City Council linked from post #1049.
The feel here among posters is to save every building in OKC that has historical value. It's not as simple as it appear. Let's face it, some of these building would be a risk. You don't want to tie up all of the funds into a building that is functionally deficient; which may have plumbing & electrical concerns; then figure out how you want to use it.
Central Park is strategically planned. Let's proceed with Central Park's vision.
Interesting observation from yesterday's MAPS 3 Park Meeting. Nearly all of the dilapidated buildings in "Hubcap Alley" on the west side of Robinson between the river and Skydance Bridge are proposed by Hargreaves for demolition as part of the south Central Park plan. Only one was proposed as being worthy of being saved as part of their evaluation.
Other notes, a urban farm is proposed, community gardens, a huge artificial turn lawn for soccer and wide area sports.
Hubcap Alley isn't pretty but it has character. Can't believe they are talking about demolishing it. Most of the buildings are dilapidated but they could be restored.
They don't want the ass end of the dilapidated buildings facing into the park.
The buildings on the west side of Robinson are garbage anyway. The ones on the east side (that's not part of the park anyhow) are the ones worth saving, IMO.
I also saw some younger guys and I assume an agent looking at the old Uniroyal shop on the corner of Robinson and SW 15th the other day. If I had a bunch of money I would love to buy that, I think it would make a pretty sweet sports bar.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks