Originally Posted by edgar
It's riparian rights. And riparian rights don't mean because you have adjacent land you own all of the water. It simply means you can use the water for domestic purposes including things like drinking it in your household (not supplying drinking water to a metroplex) or irrigation up to 3 acres without a permit. All of the water in Oklahoma is subject to Oklahoma and federal law, not the invented legal theories some of these tribes are coming up with.
So you're fine with the tribes waiting until OKC had financed the Sardis project, a huge economic boon to SE Oklahoma and then trying to turn around and claim it belongs to the tribes? I hear what you're saying, but that only happens if the tribes are in it for the money. Where were the tribes when the lake was being built? The Kiamichi watershed belongs to all Oklahomans. SE Oklahoma residents depend on the oil and gas companies and tax paying citizens of OKC and Tulsa to fund most of their infrastructure. In return, OKC and Tulsa have to exploit rural assets to be able to survive. OKC's viability as a city requires Sardis and an additional pipeline within the next 50 years. Rural Oklahoma couldn't get by without OKC and Tulsa and vice versa.
As for returning phone calls, I don't return phone calls from folks with totally made up legal theories asking for absurd results, e.g., all of the water in 22 counties. Absurd.
Ferderal predating statehood?
Even if you go back to the straight up common law version of what riparian means, it means reasonable use, i.e., not a use which harms others. Of course the rest of the water is the property of the people of Oklahoma and is appropriated by the OWRB.
Is Hefner coming back up? Have not been up that way in a bit.
Hefner is full. Drove by today and I don't know if you could add another cup of water it's so full. Same with Overholser. I was told from a nearby resident that they were letting water out the other day and if they were doing that it must be full.
OKC lakes are looking good at this time.
Except Canton.
^
"and an admission that the deed done not for need but esthetics for a movie shoot and pretty location shots during the NBA finals."
Are you a moron? If you aren't then provide a link that proves both of these situations to be true. Get a life.
Go back to the very first post on this thread. Study the photographs. Now take a little trip forward to a future August . . . and wonder where the refill water will be coming from. At that point I think the estimated number of those who care about Canton reservoir will probably have to be adjusted upward. Especially in the vicinity of OKC.
No one in OKC cared about Sardis back in the '80s, or had any intent about paying the bill owed to the feds. The tribes did indeed try to help pay the debt and were rebuffed because the greedy bullies in OKC want it all. read this and get some perspective, and compassion perhaps.Small-town residents and local tribes battle the big city for Oklahoma's Lake Sardis - Los Angeles Times
I think the jest is that OKC has 4 lakes holding drinking water - Hefner, Overholser, Drapper, AND Canton. Canton is plan B and it is almost dry, and we are coming up to a time of year when plan A doesn't work so well. I have no idea what plan C is (although I remember a Simpsons episode where plan C was to move the entire town of Springfield 5 miles down the road).
Sounds like to me that if those little towns around Sardis don't like it, they should have ponied up and bought the lake water rights themselves, or a portion there of...like OKC did...
Also, Sardis does NOT sit on the Choctaw or Chickasaw tribal lands, according to the article.....
Reading some of these apoplectic blogs from a couple months ago is pretty good fun. Atoka (where we pump from SE OK already) was down quite a bit. Bring on the Spring rains...
(capacity is 590 feet, we're at 588)
The folks referring to Atoka as "mud hole" back in 2011 seem to be exaggerating or were just unaware that the entire state was in a drought. Hefner and all of our local lakes were down too.
We seem to be at the tail end of any drought. Rainfall in most of Oklahoma has been better than normal or better in the last 30 days and if the current trend continues, give us a good tropical storm or something like that and we'll be more worried about flood control than dry lakes.
So Canton's low... hindsight being 20/20, we shouldn't have drained it. If we'd had a Summer like we did in 2012, we'd all be talking about how smart that was today. That said, it's primary purpose is to serve the water needs of the OKC metro. Everything else is secondary. It and Sardis are man made lakes made for flood control and water storage. That's the only reason they exist and OKC owns 'em.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Bookmarks