It's becoming clear that you don't know much about the Thunder or the NBA. Thabeet is off his rookie contract, and will likely only be offered a minimum contract, or something very close to that. It's very low risk move for the Thunder if they see him as a player with potential. I doubt Thabeet ever amounts to much, but the Thunder might be willing to give it a shot to find a cheap big.
Then again, I'm not sure I even understand what your last sentence means.
If Thabeet plays at all, it'll be in the last few minutes of a 20+ blowout. It's not like the Thunder are bringing him in to be a 35+ minute starter.
What I really meant was, at the point where the Thunder are in their roster, yhey aren't in a position to go out on too many limbs for "projects". You don't see many championship teams in any pro sport spending much time on "projects". And yes, I know there are exceptions to that rule, but it's not the rule. Also, one spot will have to be opened for PJIII. Probably Mohammed. Which other player that the Thunder have been developing to fit in with the team would you have the Thunder drop for a Thabeet who has a career 2.2 points per game average.
Big men develop slowly. We have a nice record of player development. Lazar Haywood and Derek Fisher could potentially leave. We've got Maynor coming back so we've got three point guards. I don't think giving Thabeet a chance is such a crazy idea.
Thabeet was a high draft pick and I've never heard of him putting up gawdy numbers. He's either in the wrong system or he just can't get it done in the NBA. ****warning, this is strictly my sole opinion and is not subject to ridicule since this is a forum. Thanks**** lol
we have 13 roster spots locked up .. we are going to add 1 maybe 2 guys (we might only carry 14 players) .... the 14th guy on just about every NBA roster is a project ...
Mohammed is not coming back
Haywood is coming back unless we trade him he has a fully guaranteed contract next season. Fisher is almost 100% gone
I agree. But should opinions be given equal weight if one is based on some sort of informed or evidentiary foundation while the alternate opinion is proffered without any supportable rationale?
Your statement — or opinion, as you described it — was declarative, as if you had a qualified, reasonable basis to support your supposition; at the same time, you were criticizing a writer who actually has a solid reputation for credibility and accuracy. My expressed opinion was that I would give (significantly) more weight and value to the proven Royce to someone who's offering dubitable opinions as if they were informed analysis. It's my opinion. Isn't that what forums are about?
It always amazes me to watch unqualified people second-guess those that know what they are talking about and know what they are doing as if these second-guessers could do it better. But that's just my opinion.
Bulls, heat, mavs are teams I heard that are interested in Fisher
Is Royal Ivey coming back ?
Fisher, Nazr, and Ivey all could be gone. "Projects" are the only thing the Thunder can afford at this point. They have to find cheap value. That's why they're doing this. It makes perfect sense.
OKC's name also appears to be in the mix for Devin Ebanks and Roger Mason, according to Chris Broussard and Royce Young.
+1 for Roger Mason.
For any NBA player that might step foot on the court $880,000 is cheap
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Bookmarks