Yeah, onthestrip is right. Simon can build all they want to, but Nordstrom, Nieman, and Saks just don't see any value in this market. And there's really not any point of enlarging the mall if you don't have a few extra anchor tenants to add. The cost is prohibitive, especially when you're talking about building expensive structured parking, if you can't sign on a large upscale anchor. It would take signing on at least one of those department stores on a long term lease to make it worthwhile. And they don't want to commit for that long when they're uncertain they will do well in this market.
Certainly Nordstrom, at the very least, is underestimating the market, just like Anthropologie did. They make the mistake of looking only at average income, rather than disposable income. That's why Anthro was shocked at how well the Tulsa store has done and why they're now willing to put a store in OKC. It shouldn't be happening, based on average income, but that's not the key piece of data. Nordstrom is a small cut above Dillards and it's ridiculous to think they wouldn't be supported here.
Crate and Barrel would make a nice, smaller anchor.
Maybe they could et rid of the 10 screen movie theater and put a Crate and Barrel in that smaller anchor space.
I think Nordstrom would do fairly well in Penn Square. The market income in OKC may not be high, but in that general area demoraphics are pretty good because of nearby Nichols Hills.
FWIW, I've heard that The Container Store is looking at one of 2 possible locations: 1. The Salvation Army building on the NW corner of NW Expressway and Penn - across from Talbots, and 2. Memorial Road.
Doesn't Chesapeake own the former Salvation Army building?
I believe it was recently sold, maybe even a few weeks ago.
Penn Square got another dose of bad news on the KFOR news tonight. They had an interview with a woman was attacked while getting in her car in the parking lot in December late at night. She had tried to find someone from security to go to her car with her but couldn't. She was able to fight off the attacker but had a cast on her arm.
JcPenney built that store from the ground up... So I cannot see them leaving the mall unless the mall went the route of Crossroads. That would be like you building your own condo that you custom built/designed and the neighbors telling you that you have to move becuase they want your condo so a friend or family member can live on your property in your place.
I checked the property records and Simon is listed as the owner with the mall anchors listed on the deed. I am willing to bet like most malls Simon owns the land and the anchors own their buildings. The anchors pay a lease fee for the land each year which frees the anchors from paying for groundskeeping, parking repairs and security services.
Re Oneforone's reminder that JC Penney built their store, the mismatched brick on the south facade really, really bothers me. Each time we go there my wife has to hear me complain about how bad it looks. Does it bother anyone else?
Actually Simon owns all of the anchors. Obviously, JC Penney signed a long term lease, so, since it was their building, they got to have a say in the design process. This is one problem Crossroads had that Penn Square didn't have when Wards went broke. Simon owned the Wards space at Penn so it was easy to lease back out to Dillards. Crossroads spent months and months trying to purchase the anchor space from the creditors of Wards.
That is exactly what I posted. Many retailers own their building but not the land underneath it. Which makes the tenant and the land owner co-owners. It is like if I own land and I let you build a house on it with money you borrowed from the bank and later on you default on the loan. The bank cannot do anything if I am willing to payoff the loan or have the ablity to refinance the debt.
If Simon owned the whole package, that would mean Simon would also have to pay for the maintenance costs just like a landlord does for a tenant at a rent house. Wal-Mart is the only major retail company that owns the whole package these days. That is why so many Wal-Marts relocated over the last few years. It was not because the store was outdated or crumbling (240 store was barely 10 years old when they moved it). It was because they wanted to get out paying lease fees and the Supercenter concept was making them a killing. Had a real grocery and retail competitors been in Oklahoma City at the time most of the Supecenters were built, I don't think the OKC Metro would have half the amount it does now. At the time the Supecenters exploded most of OKC was ruled by local grocery stores. Most of them cut and run when Wal-Mart came to town. The rest with the exeception of Crest and Buy For Less sank when Fleming went under. That is another story for another time.
Jc Penny's doesn't really own their building if it's on a ground lease. Once their ground lease is up or if they default on lease then Simon would own the building. This is how most ground leases work so I am assuming this is the case on this one.
That is how many downtown buildings are done as well, I know that is a fact in Downtown Dallas. The One Dallas Center building is sitting on land owned by the Sanger Sisters Trust (Sanger-Harris Department store family) with a 100 year ground lease, I found that out while reading through legal documents regarding creditor claims we had against the building for unpaid work. When I worked in Dallas the First Baptist Church of Dallas/Criswell Property Trust was the largest single property owner in the CBD. The only buildings they owned were their own church buildings, everything else was built on their ground leases. The used much of the smaller buildings in the area they owned around their church for the new church projects buying the leases out of buildings on the land they owned.
Kind of one of those they do and don't own it things, it all depends on how the lease is structured. Some leases have very distinct parameters for renewal which gives much more power to the building "owner" than some leases do. The anchor stores at Highland Mall here in Austin have been sold to Austin Community College, both building and ground as they were platted as one with with ownership by the anchors with access easements from the mall property.
So the store moving in where Waldenbooks was located is a dress store called Windsor.
Here's their website for more details:
http://www.windsorstore.com/
They also have one at Woodland Hills Mall in Tulsa.
I also heard today that within the next 5-10 years, there may be plans to expand Penn Square and possibly add a Nordstrom, Saks, or other similar high end anchor, and replace lost surface parking with one new parking garage and and expansion of the existing parking garage by adding 2-3 levels of parking. They'd love to expand the mall to 2 million square feet of shopping space.
I presented some of the illustrations presented on this thread, and they really like the concept of expanding making the large square as illustrated in pics above. It's very similar to the expansion that was made at Northpark Center in Dallas. I'll keep you updated.
While I am a bit nostalgic about it going, I have to admit the last time I was in one it seemed odd it was still open. With all the selection in larger stores, online and digital distribution it is impressive they have remained competitive and would be going out due to loosing a lease to a higher bidder.
The only plausible spot I could see them getting any more room for building is if they made another parking garage and then build on the existing parking just west of macy's, but it would be hard to make it work well.
Yeah, I think they really like this plan, except with more retail space on the west side to make it a complete square like with Northpark Center in Dallas. And eliminate the hallway between V and C. Also, the square on the west labeled "C" would be a department store, just west of Pepperoni Grill in the west parking lot. A few extra decks would be added to the existing parking garage, and a new parking garage would be built on the north side of Macy's and the new addition.
I also think that taking the title "Mall" off of the name, and just calling it "Penn Square" would be better.
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)
Bookmarks