Widgets Magazine
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 76 to 97 of 97

Thread: Does OKC really have traffic issues?

  1. #76

    Default Re: Does OKC really have traffic issues?

    I'm going to put you down in the No column Spartan.

  2. #77

    Default Re: Does OKC really have traffic issues?

    OKC doesn't have a traffic problem yet.

    Our symptoms are the result of poor interchanges and bad drivers.

    Bad drivers do not use the road efficiently...waiting until the last second to accelerate to get onto the highway, merging at incredibly slow speeds causing others behind to slow down and compact, slowing down for turns on interstates, coming to near complete stops when turning from a street to a driveway, blocking intersections, blocking the 'fast' lanes at 5mph under the speed limit, etc.

    If we had better interchanges and more efficient use of our roadways by having better drivers we would be a lot better.

  3. #78

    Default Re: Does OKC really have traffic issues?

    Quote Originally Posted by Just the facts View Post
    I think that is the issue we are discussing bluedogok. If stations are built where there is an existing density then you can get better ridership than building a remote station with nothing around it but a parking lot and open space. TOD stations have parking garages if someone wants to drive to it. Venture79 had some good ideas on where to location stations in Norman that can either take advantage of existing density or be located in a place where development is desirable (OU Duck Pond area). But building a park and ride station at Rock Creek Road isn't it going to do anything but make sprawl more convenient and increase traffic in the area.
    I know some of the ones on the one line in Austin are that way but most were slated to have TOD development and some did have developers signed up and the August 2008 happened. We had a few projects terminated that were TOD related in Austin because of the credit crisis. Most of those still haven't started back up because the land has been tied up in bankruptcies. For the most part Austin's system is run on former freight track so it wasn't exactly as well directed as the Denver system which was more carved out of highway right of way than existing rail lines. I do agree that if it is located near existing density it makes it a better solution for everyone.

  4. #79

    Default Re: Does OKC really have traffic issues?

    Quote Originally Posted by Just the facts View Post
    Maybe on discussion is based on undefined terms.

    Park and Ride station: You park and then you ride



    Mixed-use train station: You can go here and maybe not even ride the train



    Neither one of these option reduces congestion on the freeway, so why not pick the one that offers more than just a parking space?
    So you just hate cars???? lol

    Why can't it be mixed with a good bus system???? Have a few park and rides and then have a few stops in urban areas like DD.

  5. Default Re: Does OKC really have traffic issues?

    I'm with Plutonic, you really have to have both and all. You can't only put in density related stations because then you're forcing the outliers to drive to get to density to then get on the train. You really need to have all options available, from the most dense station downtown (or wherever you chose to have the lines cross the most) to a remote station with the large lot.

    D.C. is a great example of how a system can work in a diverse environment....and across state/district lines, which requires a LOT of cooperation. You've got the large lot stations in places like Bathesda, MD where the "locals" drive and park and then ride into the core. Then you've also got the stations with zero parking like on the Mall. The same system is also above and below ground depending on where you are in the system. It's fast, reliable, CLEAN, and safe.

  6. #81

    Default Re: Does OKC really have traffic issues?

    Quote Originally Posted by bombermwc View Post
    I'm with Plutonic, you really have to have both and all. You can't only put in density related stations because then you're forcing the outliers to drive to get to density to then get on the train. You really need to have all options available, from the most dense station downtown (or wherever you chose to have the lines cross the most) to a remote station with the large lot.
    That doesn't make sense. Outliers are going to have to drive to get on the train no matter what. Dense developments can still have parking, but they shouldn't be just parking.

  7. #82

    Default Re: Does OKC really have traffic issues?

    Quote Originally Posted by Plutonic Panda View Post
    So you just hate cars???? lol
    It isn't that I hate cars but I believe they are an enabler of things that have had a bad impact on our country, society, and environment over the last 60 years. We have simply become so dependent on them that everyone has to own one to participate in life. Kids can't walk to school or walk to a corner market, teenagers struggle to get to work, the poor have to resort to spending hours on buses, the elderly get abandoned and survive on "meals on wheels" programs, parents spend hours commuting, road rage, aggressive driving, and drunk driving kill 10,000+ people a year (not to mention all the people who are injured and don't die), people spend almost as much on transportation as the do on housing (and in some cases more), we have to maintain a global military to keep the oil flowing at affordable prices, sprawl has divided us by race and income at levels of precision previously unthinkable, many of our cities have air quality so poor that people can't go outside for days at a time, we build entire disposable neighborhoods, etc... etc... etc...

    You know, maybe I do hate cars . Al Gore called them the most destructive force on the planet and being a good right-winger I dismissed that as crazy talk from a loon, but I think now he was right about that.

    Anyhow, let's not try to get to far off the topic at hand (a lot of that is going around lately).

  8. #83

    Default Re: Does OKC really have traffic issues?

    Quote Originally Posted by Just the facts View Post
    Maybe this is a stupid question but what time does the Sooner Express arrive/depart the Sooner Express Parking lot?
    Missed this the other day. Sooner Express runs from Campus through Norman and then runs as an express to DT OKC. It has stops inside OKC from DT into HSC and on to State capitol area before returning into DT and over to the transit Center. It then is express back to Norman and on to Campus. While inside either community, a tug on the rope signals driver you want off at next stop. That may be a marked stop or it may be just past an upcoming intersection.

    Departing Norman, I only board at the Homeland off NW24 / W Robinson. Most times I step off at the first DT OKC stop and stroll to where I am going. On return trips, I pick it up at the Transit Center and either pop off at the Homeland, or if I did not have my car awaiting, I'll pop off in DT Norman, say W Main / Webster and stroll to somewhere nearby to eat, the Library, Post Office or pop in on a friend who offices near the P.O.

    Using the Homeland Stop as the focal point:
    Norman to OKC buses depart at 6:35, 7:00 and 8:30 a.m. with afternoon runs at 2:05 and 4:35.
    OKC to Norman buses depart transit center at 9;25 a.m. and afternoon runs at 2:55, 4:55 and 5:30

    If there was a noonish bus and later eve service or weekend service, I'd gladly make use of it. There are times I drive to the city because it is unlikely I'll be done in time for the 9:25 return bus but I know I'll be done long, long before the 2:55 bus. Wrapping up at 10-11, and having 3-5 hours to kill or find a spot to work out of isn't often practical.

    However, I admit some days it does make for a leisurely visit to the library, a nice stroll and ample time to enjoy lunch, DT or otherwise if on/near a bus route. Fortunately, a decent amount of what I do involves a laptop or a cell phone. So as long as I can find a quiet private location and have battery power, work can proceed.


    Main route - major points (but note: South Oval is presently closed and buses in Norman terminate at a Brooks Street transfer point not shown on the map, but adjacent to south oval on the east side at the ROTC/Armory building if I recall correctly.)
    http://gometro.publishpath.com/Websi...e%2024_web.pdf

  9. #84

    Default Re: Does OKC really have traffic issues?

    Thanks Kevin - I was trying to line up the stops on the route guide with the timetable but I couldn't find an entry for Sooner Express Parking lot which on the map looks to be at the corner of Robinson and 24th.

  10. #85

    Default Re: Does OKC really have traffic issues?

    Quote Originally Posted by Just the facts View Post
    Thanks Kevin - I was trying to line up the stops on the route guide with the timetable but I couldn't find an entry for Sooner Express Parking lot which on the map looks to be at the corner of Robinson and 24th.
    Along the south side of the Homeland lot is where folks park and the bus stops. It pulls off 24th onto Westport Drive then does a short loop around to the south to go back on 24th to Robinson to the Interstate.

  11. Default Re: Does OKC really have traffic issues?

    Quote Originally Posted by hoyasooner View Post
    That doesn't make sense. Outliers are going to have to drive to get on the train no matter what. Dense developments can still have parking, but they shouldn't be just parking.

    I think you missed the exaplanation. The "large lot" stations are the suburb stations where you drive there to hop on the train for the rest of the ride. The whole point of what i said was, you have to have ALL options in a successful system.

  12. #87

    Default Re: Does OKC really have traffic issues?

    Quote Originally Posted by bombermwc View Post
    I think you missed the exaplanation. The "large lot" stations are the suburb stations where you drive there to hop on the train for the rest of the ride. The whole point of what i said was, you have to have ALL options in a successful system.
    I don't see why. What is the difference between a parking lot that holds 500 cars and a parking garage that holds 500 cars, and sits next to a walkable shopping area.

  13. #88

    Default Re: Does OKC really have traffic issues?

    This story was on our local Jax news a few nights ago. I am at a loss for words to explain it. Why can people not see the obvious cause and effect right in front of them?

    Local|Action News - Jacksonville News, Weather & Sports - ActionNewsJax.com

  14. #89

    Default Re: Does OKC really have traffic issues?

    ^

    Ha! Oh, the hyperbole of local news stations: MAJOR! problem; TRAFFIC NIGHTMARE TO GET WORSE!

    And always interviewing one random person on the street like that is in any way remotely relevant.


    How long after widening that road (looks a lot like NW Expressway) before traffic clogs it again?

  15. #90

    Default Re: Does OKC really have traffic issues?

    I can tell you from first hand experince the traffic in that portion of Orange Park is some of worst localized traffic I have ever seen. The off-ramp backs up 5 miles across the St Johns River everyday between 3PM and 7PM (that is not a joke - the off-ramp lanes start just after you get on the Buckman Bridge and the bridge itself is just over 3 miles long). Once you are on Blanding forget it - it goes nowhere.

    We have lived in Jax for 11 years - that area has always been under construction. As soon as they get done they have to start again. When we first started looking to move here we found lots of homes in that area the were very affordable and big. We drove over on a Saturday and traffic was mind blowing. We didn't even make it to the model home in the subdivision. I just turned the car around and we looked in a different part of town.

    The sad part is there is an exsiting railroad right-of-way that travels through the area, passes the largest employer in Jacksonville (NAS JAX) and goes right downtown while passing close to several historic high density neighborhood. It would be perfect for commuter rail. Sadly, we were told last night that The Better Jacksonville Plan which was supposed to pay for that kind of stuff was broke. We have 9 years left on the temporary tax and the money has all been spent.

  16. #91

    Default Re: Does OKC really have traffic issues?

    I timed it today leaving work. It took me 6 minutes from when I got in my truck until I was on the interstate, almost to the second. That's not bad for "rush hour" traffic. From then on I was able to speed on the interstate.

  17. #92

    Default Re: Does OKC really have traffic issues?

    Quote Originally Posted by hoyasooner View Post
    I timed it today leaving work. It took me 6 minutes from when I got in my truck until I was on the interstate, almost to the second. That's not bad for "rush hour" traffic. From then on I was able to speed on the interstate.
    I live 7 miles from work. At 4am it takes 11 minutes, at 1230pm it takes 17 minutes going back. Not bad at all for a city of our size.

  18. #93

    Default Re: Does OKC really have traffic issues?

    I travel I-35 northbound between Norman and South OKC each morning around 6:30-7. From 19th steet in Moore to i-240 it's pretty much constant stop and go during this time frame. A couple of years ago I could travel this and not run into any stops. Now it's pretty much an everyday occurence and I've had to adjust when I leave my house to get to work. I know OKC don't really have "bad" traffic problems compared to other cities but has anyone else noticed the volume of traffic has increased greatly in this corridor in the last year or so?

  19. #94

    Default Re: Does OKC really have traffic issues?

    This thread has more traffic than okc...pft...

  20. #95

    Default Re: Does OKC really have traffic issues?

    No traffic to speak of in OKC. I just got back from Paris, they have 18 different rail lines (subway and above) and still have a traffic problem. It took almost an hour to get to the airport from the Arch of Triumph during NON rush hour this past Monday. They have a traffic problem, we don't. They also have an estimated 10 million people.

  21. #96

    Default Re: Does OKC really have traffic issues?

    That is proof again the rail doesn't solve traffic congestion - for those that choose to sit in traffic.

  22. #97

    Default Re: Does OKC really have traffic issues?

    We would have taken the train to the airport, but were told that it takes a couple of hours because of all the stops. It would have been much cheaper though, we paid 80 bucks for the taxi. Ouch

    We did take the Blue Line in the Tube from Heathrow in London, that wasn't bad at all, and much less than a cab. But I hate dragging bags up and down stairs in the connections.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-07-2013, 05:03 AM
  2. OKC Million Dollar Traffic Management System?
    By Brett in forum Transportation
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-27-2011, 08:02 PM
  3. OKC Taxi Cab Issues
    By mcca7596 in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 04-20-2011, 12:35 AM
  4. Rush hour traffic in OKC
    By Andrew4OU in forum Transportation
    Replies: 107
    Last Post: 12-29-2010, 09:45 PM
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-20-2010, 05:33 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO