I wasn't completely bashing it. I 1,000% get why they have that influence. But still, in any other arena (pun intended), a 5% owner trying to flex their muscle would be ridiculed and laughed out of the boardroom.
But I get it. It is being built for an anchor tenant, so they can make demands, as long as they do their part when the time comes.
LOL. The vote already passed...their role in stopping it has ended. Where the hell else do they want to put it? They trying to spend more money that they didn’t want to spend in the first place to put it somewhere else on a tract that makes less sense and/or isn't owned by the city?
That's just the most unproductive/spiteful type of politics lol.
And the Thunder care about optics also. The building will be mostly done at that point if they target 2028. The NBA cares about the Olympics due to Team USA. It's not the only reason, but you can bet they are telling city leadership all the reasons it is in their best interest to get it built as fast as they can.
My hope is that OKC will build an arena that will prioritize accommodations for NBA specifications as well as large gatherings associated with the new convention center. An arena with 18,500 permanent fixed seats capable of hosting 19,500 for NBA basketball. Thunder promised to have some affordable seats for all.
Build the suits above the lower level and upper deck. Lodge boxes can be built on the lower level.
If our city were to take the aggressive approach and bring back the 10,000 attendee FFA state convention (currently in Tulsa) and offer 'free rent' for long-term commitments for conventions; there just might be a way to utilize the new arena and the Paycom Center before making the decision to demolish the Paycom Center.
True, and that's why IMO we (OKC) need to build an arena with more seating if you want it to be loud and intimating.
Aware of the recent trend with smaller capacities like Milwaukee Fiserv Forum (17,385), San Francisco Chase Center (18,064) and Los Angeles Clipper's Intuit Dome (18,000); make our new arena a larger version of 'LOUD CITY.'
A larger capacity will allow OKC to bid on more events outside the NBA like NCAA sporting events (Basketball regionals, Gymnastics, Volleyball.) BTW do we still have the indoor track built with the Myriad or is it obsolete?
Broke ground - September 17, 2021 - Construction cost $2 billion
Not a fan of this design for an arena in OKC (looks like a pill bug); however, I'm sure it is a perfect fit for California. This arena as Urbanized points out is 222% ($2 billion) compared to our arena budget of $900 million. Look for the new OKC downtown arena to be just as competitive as the Intuit Dome.
Welcome to Thunderdome . . .
I wouldn't care what it looked like, if I wasn't paying. If the Clippers owner wants that gaudy thing, it's his money.
Anybody know how much of the Clippers new arena cost is for land acquisition? That has to be a significant portion of the cost, right? OKC is essentially saving money by utilizing land they already own.
OKC may be free but there is a structure on the site that needs to be removed. Probably not overall cost in OKC's favor by comparison; unless they can knock the myriad down by a few $10 million.
Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!
He also had to buy The Forum for $400MM to end the lawsuit with MSG/ James Dolan. https://www.cbssports.com/nba/news/c...square-garden/
Ours and LA's aren't really comparable for a multitude of reasons.
There's also tons of stories floating around about Ballmer visiting the site 2-3X a week, and making changes he wants to the original plan. That obviously incurs large and consistent change orders. The guy is worth $125 BILLION. $2.2 or $2.3 or $2.4 for his new arena is a rounding error. It's a fun hobby to him.
Here's some more on Clips. It's pretty fascinating what Ballmer is doing. OKC just isn't in a position to do it. https://www.sportsbusinessjournal.co.../19/facilities
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (1 members and 5 guests)
Bookmarks