The current baseball stadium could be upgraded to be really nice if there was desire to do so. They could start by turning the closed off upper first base deck into some kind of party deck. There is just no desire/money to do so. We are going to building a new basketball arena that will end up being over a a billion dollars so baseball and soccer should be happy with what they have or will be getting.
Are they buying the entire property or just this parcel? Wouldn’t that mean the entire property would need to be cleaned and have the soil remediated? IIRC wasn’t the asking price of the entire development something like 100+ million dollars or am I imagining things?
If anything this makes me think there is more behind this plan that hasn’t been released. A commercial element with retail, restaurants, hotels and housing. I’d expect most of the site work for the entire development to be complete with several other projects under construction if not complete by the time the stadium opens.
Funk is only buying 9 acres and then donating some or all of that to the City for the stadium.
The overall Producers Coop parcel is 34 acres.
So are there going to be plans to at least make the rest of the site developable before or by the time the stadium opens? I wouldn’t imagine they could open this in the middle of a contaminated field. Surely they’d have to remediate the soil and remove contaminants for the whole 34 acres even if they’re just taking a small part of it.
SO what you guys are telling me is 9 acres of stadium and 25 acres of parking surface. Nice!
"Contaminants" can mean a lot of different things. Not like were talking about walking through a nuclear wasteland to see a soccer game.
from the city press release/story
https://www.okc.gov/Home/Components/...ce=govdelivery
Economic development funds could be leveraged for MAPS 4 Multipurpose Stadium
Post Date:01/02/2024 1:03 PM
On Jan. 4, the Downtown TIF Review Committee will consider using economic development funds to increase the budget for the MAPS 4 Multipurpose Stadium from $41 million to $71 million.
The proposal is contingent on the multipurpose stadium being located downtown where an additional $30 million in Tax Increment Financing (TIF) and other economic development funds could pay for a portion of the stadium’s construction costs.
The proposal will be considered by the Oklahoma City Oklahoma City Economic Development Trust on Jan. 5 and City Council on Jan. 16.
Property under contract
OKC Energy FC Ownership is under contract to purchase an area of undeveloped property south of Bricktown and east of the Oklahoma City Convention Center from the Producers Downtown Development, LLC. The ownership group plans to donate 7.2 acres of the area to the City for the stadium, which the City will own.
OKC Energy FC Ownership plans to develop the remaining area into a sports-centered entertainment district.
The land donation is dependent on approval from the MAPS 4 Venues Subcommittee and the MAPS 4 Citizens Advisory Board, which could take place in early spring.
Stadium details
The stadium design includes a United States Soccer Federation (USSF)-approved pitch, seating for approximately 8,000 guests, locker rooms and suites. The venue is expected to drive the development of a sports-centered entertainment district downtown, a model that has proven to be successful in Louisville, Kentucky, and Indianapolis, Indiana. A similar project is under construction in Pawtucket, Rhode Island.
The venue will be the City’s only stadium with a USSF-approved pitch to accommodate professional men’s and women’s soccer. When the area develops, visitors will be able to walk from restaurants, retail and housing to attend events in the new entertainment district.
What in the world is going on here???
Holt openly admits there was no budget for land acquisition. So at a minimum the plan was to have someone donate premium land in the downtown vicinity. That part is fact.
Now on the side of speculation what was being discussed behind the scenes? Going into it knowing you were gonna get free land leads me to believe that would always accompany a development opportunity at little to no cost.
I’m pumped that the city is moving these developments along and we’re pushing forward for growth. At the same time
I’m jealous I’m not a major developer in OKC right now with 1% wealth. It appears as though having the right connections can present a sweetheart deal at the burden of tax payers. Which we’re passing this stuff with an overwhelming majority in approval so good for all of us…. I think
I LOVE that Funk is already anticipating building parking garage(s) to accommodate this, rather than the usual sea of parking developers often build around stadiums. That itself indicates to me that they're serious about the entire site not just the 9 acres. ..
Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!
Regarding the remediation of the site, my understanding is that won't need to happen for an open-air stadium.
Below is a link to a proposal by the state in Sep ‘23 to sample the site to collect data for remediation. The contaminants of concern are volatile organic compounds and total petroleum hydrocarbons which are very broad categories that can include something as innocuous as WD-40 to a carcinogen such as benzene or any hydrocarbon in between. The state must not be too concerned because on page 2 it states that 1) all contaminated soils will be disposed of in the OKC landfill and 2) respirators are not listed as required personal protective equipment. When will the sampling take place, no date is given.
https://oklahoma.gov/content/dam/ok/...ion%20plan.pdf
So the state issues a report speculating as to what contaniments are buried at this site. They have not done any testing to get specifics. Yet the state has the audacity to say contaniments can be dumped in a landfill. Also without knowing specifics they claim respirators will not be required safety equipment.
2 words come to mind, "Imagine that"!
I believe you're correct. I have a mental block when I read "remediation". I was the Facilities Manager for Kerr-McGee R&D during the final years of the plutonium plant clean up which R&D was made responsible for. It was a losing sleep level nightmare which I would not wish on my worst enemy. But that was NRC rules and they are ridiculously stringent. The EPA, who I also had to deal with, is much more reasonable.
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)
Bookmarks