Well I do suffer from OCD but I don’t believe I have been excessively negative- oh well if I have. I’m not worried about my popularity, so it doesn’t bother me. I’ll treat it like a game of old man on the porch yelling at kids to get off my lawn.
Now that I have said that - I personally don’t care about the incentives to builders/developers - let them have them if they can get them. I do live in Okc/OK county and my money does pay taxes here, but this doesn’t really affect me in general. I’m not going to live there, but sure I will stroll around it once built.
feel like that was a really harsh reaction from hotrod. if the taxpayer is footing 1/3 of the cost, then the taxpayer has every right to voice opinion, concerns, or what they feel are shortcomings for the project.
of course okc is going to use TIF to help finance projects that will make a meaningful change to the city. of course OKC is going to provide incentives to bring businesses, housing, and amenities in. and they should! but if my taxes are helping pay for it, i'm allowed to ask questions and provide opinions.
I hope the TIF award can be structured on a per-tower basis as well.Carras told council members that the Boardwalk project will be built tower by tower based on leasing benchmarks and that it will take between two and six years for completion.
The $200,000,000 TIF for this project passed City Council today 7-2, with Cooper and Hamon voting against.
As I always like to point out, by the time these incentives hit a public agenda, closed-door meetings have already taken place and they only move forward when they have enough support at all levels to get approval.
As far as I know - and I've been closely following all this for close to two decades - every single TIF award has passed at every single level due to this process.
I'm generally excited that this is moving forward, but I hope the big dangle of affordable housing is something concrete. After watching Tsoodle on the news last night, it's obvious he doesn't consider housing affordability to be a priority. Randy Hogan and the people involved with this should feel compelled to follow through on the promise, but there is absolutely nothing holding them to it. They can basically do what they want now.
Knowing that, I would have been inclined to vote "No" as well.
affordable housing does not always mean LOW income housing. there was a presentation where they indicated the affordable housing metric for Oklahoma City is 1,800 for a 2 br residence (or is it 1,600?). This metric was provided by HUD and was indicated it's on par with Houston and Los Angeles; a bit surprising for OKC but still it is from the federal government (HUD).
1800 if that's what it ends up being is not like giving apartments for free, and you can be sure the affordable units will be on low floors. I too hope they include because they will still be able to make money AND provide a service to those who could not otherwise live in a luxury highrise.
Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!
The Douglass at Page Woodson when it first opened had almost all affordable housing rates. A one-bedroom was $675. Not sure if you still have to meet the affordable standards there, but they have gone up to $840 for a one-bedroom. A two bedroom is $999 a month.
Page Woodson Pricing
Hopefully since the TIF passed, we'll get to see some renderings sooner rather than later.
I am hoping that this will have to go through the design commission, then city council again.
There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 7 guests)
Bookmarks