Widgets Magazine
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 52 of 52

Thread: Is Mayor Cornett anti-growth?

  1. #51

    Default Re: Is Mayor Cornett anti-growth?

    Quote Originally Posted by CuatrodeMayo View Post
    I am quite aware of the arguements supporting this situation. It's sad that athletics take such a precedence at this university.
    It's money actually. Money takes priority. Athletics are just a vehicle to obtain more money.

    Because our state legislature, in its great wisdom has decided to support higher ed less and less, the burden of support has fallen to the schools themselves. Those schools have had to pass along those costs to the students. This is squeezing many out of higher ed completely.

    Projects like these are undertaken with the future in mind. Years from now, these athletics facilities will probably provide OSU with a lot of profit and donations. That's money which won't have to go into tuition hikes.

    Yeah, we bitch about it now, but 20 years from now, the controversy surrounding the taking of the land will be forgotten and hopefully OSU has a proud (and profitable) athletic tradition.

    Currently, OSU faculty are paid less than any other faculty in the Big XII. It's good to see that the administration is not happy with the status quo.

    That is a lot of "if"s.

    ED CAN be used as a tool to fuel growth. Use ED for "public use" projects. MAPS is the perfect example of public investment spurring private investment. Why not follow the same example? Once the civic aspect of the plan has been completed, allow the market (plus TIF) to work within the framework of the plan and within guidelines simlar to the ones I presented above. I'm pretty sure you don't need to use ED to rezone.
    Sure it's a lot of "ifs." But nothing is ever so simple as "We tried it and it failed." Additionally, any development in the future will be riddled with "ifs." That's the nature of the beast.

    The best thing a municipality can do is to limit those ifs and try to achieve the creation of an environment which people will want to live and work in while adhering to strictly urban designs.

  2. #52

    Default Re: Is Mayor Cornett anti-growth?

    There is nothing wrong with a man who 25 years ago lived in a two bedroom house and worked diligently to become a major player in piedmont, oklahoma and the world while benefiting himself and providing jobs and opportunity for oklahoman. Mayor Cornett also has worked hard for himslef and Oklahoma. Put funk's proposal to the people of oklahoma and let them vote on it.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. OKC or TULSA? Which Metro Has The Most Long-Term Growth Potential?
    By JOHNINSOKC in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 159
    Last Post: 12-17-2007, 11:02 AM
  2. Impressive growth in the West Metro
    By JOHNINSOKC in forum Suburban & Other OK Communities
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-07-2007, 06:10 PM
  3. Replies: 19
    Last Post: 08-31-2006, 12:54 PM
  4. TAP Architect talks about 'smart growth' for OKC
    By Pete in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 05-14-2006, 08:19 AM
  5. OKC population density and growth maps?
    By Luke in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-09-2005, 11:11 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO