I agree wholeheartedly with this. If we would ever properly address land use policy to discourage (or at the very least to disincentivize) development at the fringe, TIF would be less necessary. If we’d done it years ago it DEFINITELY wouldn’t be necessary.
Instead, we sold our collective souls to auto-centric, cheap and tacky sprawl in a way that all but guaranteed we’d eventually have to incentivize urban development if we wanted to recreate and maintain a vibrant urban core, which any properly-functioning metropolitan area demands.
Bookmarks