Widgets Magazine
Page 28 of 116 FirstFirst ... 232425262728293031323378 ... LastLast
Results 676 to 700 of 2876

Thread: Friends for a Better Boulevard

  1. #676

    Default Re: Friends for a Better Boulevard

    Very helpful to understanding where this came from. Notice the similarities between this debate and the one back then? Numbers were being tweaked to justify the outcome. Also note that the city had their own independent consultants that did not agree and they were still "overun" by ODOT. A few specific engineers run this town my friends.

  2. #677

    Default Re: Friends for a Better Boulevard

    I found McCaleb's quote at the end of the story very revealing. It seems to typify the attitude of ODOT and too many other officials. We are up against quite a bit of long standing political inertia but I remain hopeful......

  3. #678

    Default Re: Friends for a Better Boulevard

    Quote Originally Posted by Urban Pioneer View Post
    Very helpful to understanding where this came from. Notice the similarities between this debate and the one back then? Numbers were being tweaked to justify the outcome. Also note that the city had their own independent consultants that did not agree and they were still "overun" by ODOT. A few specific engineers run this town my friends.
    Overrun by.ODOT and the FHA.

    But federal highway administration representatives attending the meeting said the railroad tracks already divide the neighborhood. North-south streets passing under the tracks can be rebuilt to cross over the completed highway, they said.
    If this is still their attitude then I don't expect any support from the FHA.

  4. #679

    Default Re: Friends for a Better Boulevard

    Quote Originally Posted by CaptDave View Post
    I found McCaleb's quote at the end of the story very revealing. It seems to typify the attitude of ODOT and too many other officials. We are up against quite a bit of long standing political inertia but I remain hopeful......
    You mean the bit about how "the citizens advisory board has been working for us in this process for three years” before plans became regrettably public?

  5. #680

    Default Re: Friends for a Better Boulevard

    My email to the mayor was forward down to Eric Wegner.

    (Catch22) -



    I received your email from the Mayor's office, and very much appreciate your interest in the Oklahoma City Boulevard project. The Oklahoma Department of Transportation is managing the project, and as you know, the planning and design is underway. They have been working closely with the City of Oklahoma City, and many ideas about the overall design have been discussed. Mayor Cornett has been involved, and the design team includes engineers, planners, a walkability expert and other consultants to help ensure the design provides the best project possible. There are many options being considered for the various components of the new roadway, including how to best address traffic flow but also to consider important elements such as future development and walkability. At this time, no decisions regarding a final design have been made. But based on progress to date, I am confident the new Boulevard will provide many new ground level opportunities, especially through the downtown core and into the Bricktown areas.



    Your concern about the Boulevard being elevated is shared by many, but I believe it is due to lack of drawings and renderings that are not yet available. Although the Boulevard includes elevated sections to provide access and connections to I-44, and also to I-35/I-235, there is a significant portion of ground level roadway that is being designed to ensure opportunities for downtown access and future development. The current design ground level portion begins just east of Western Avenue and extends to the east side of Oklahoma Avenue, near the Harkins Theater. This nearly 10 block section will create several new intersections at Walker, Hudson, Harvey, Robinson, Broadway, Gaylord, and Oklahoma that don't exist today. In addition, since the new roadway will be narrower than the former highway, many areas of the existing highway right-of-way adjacent to the new boulevard will be available to further enhance development and pedestrian opportunities.



    The City's goal is to develop a new boulevard that will significantly enhance the downtown Oklahoma City area. In order to provide better information, City staff is working with ODOT to make a presentation to the City Council on July 31st, which will be during their regular meeting. This meeting will be aired on Cox Channel 20 and will also be available on the City's website at www.okc.gov. ODOT has also tentatively planned a public meeting on August 21st, and we are awaiting confirmation of the time and location. I'm certain notices will be sent by ODOT as this public meeting is important to the design process.



    Thanks again for your interest, and I hope you will take the opportunity to follow the update to Council and also participate in the upcoming public meeting.



    Eric



    Eric J. Wenger, P.E.

    Director Public Works/

    City Engineer

    (405) 297-3486

    eric.wenger@okc.gov

  6. #681

    Default Re: Friends for a Better Boulevard

    If this is still their attitude then I don't expect any support from the FHA.[/QUOTE]

    I wouldn't expect any support from the FHA, either, but they did insure my first mortgage, which is nice.

  7. #682

    Default Re: Friends for a Better Boulevard

    I've been giving that statement a great deal of thought. I think things are different. The FHWA and lawmakers aren't beholden to Ernest Istook. I was in some of those meetings after the decisions had been made via the Chamber. That was a different time.

  8. #683

    Default Re: Friends for a Better Boulevard

    Your concern about the Boulevard being elevated is shared by many, but I believe it is due to lack of drawings and renderings that are not yet available. Although the Boulevard includes elevated sections to provide access and connections to I-44, and also to I-35/I-235, there is a significant portion of ground level roadway that is being designed to ensure opportunities for downtown access and future development. The current design ground level portion begins just east of Western Avenue and extends to the east side of Oklahoma Avenue, near the Harkins Theater. This nearly 10 block section will create several new intersections at Walker, Hudson, Harvey, Robinson, Broadway, Gaylord, and Oklahoma that don't exist today. In addition, since the new roadway will be narrower than the former highway, many areas of the existing highway right-of-way adjacent to the new boulevard will be available to further enhance development and pedestrian opportunities.
    Is he really this ignorant, has a different definition of "ground level" or just lying through his teeth?

  9. #684

    Default Re: Friends for a Better Boulevard

    Quote Originally Posted by Buffalo Bill View Post
    I wouldn't expect any support from the FHA, either, but they did insure my first mortgage, which is nice.
    That is the subject of a whole other debate about development patterns since WWII. I would strongly argue against the "which is nice" part.

    For those that are confused: FHA - Federal Housing Authority. FHWA - Federal Highway Adminstration. Both agencies work everyday to make American just a little worse than it was the day before.

  10. Default Re: Friends for a Better Boulevard

    Quote Originally Posted by jn1780 View Post
    Is he really this ignorant, has a different definition of "ground level" or just lying through his teeth?

    Can someone please give me the context of the "the current design ground level portion begins just east of Western Avenue" ? Was this a letter from Wenger? Can someone send me a copy of it?

  11. #686

    Default Re: Friends for a Better Boulevard

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve View Post
    Can someone please give me the context of the "the current design ground level portion begins just east of Western Avenue" ? Was this a letter from Wenger? Can someone send me a copy of it?
    It was sent to catch22 from Wenger apparently.

  12. Default Re: Friends for a Better Boulevard

    That entirely depends on the magnitude of what is considered "just east".

  13. #688

    Default Re: Friends for a Better Boulevard

    Quote Originally Posted by CuatrodeMayo View Post
    That entirely depends on the magnitude of what is considered "just east".
    True, Western is very close to Walker in astronautical units.

  14. Default Re: Friends for a Better Boulevard

    Quote Originally Posted by jn1780 View Post
    It was sent to catch22 from Wenger apparently.
    Catch22, can you send me a full copy of that email or letter so that I can post it on the OKC Central blog?

  15. #690

    Default Re: Friends for a Better Boulevard

    just
    near
    close
    accessible

    basically weasel/wiggle/say-nada type words

    as I read it, one could possibly sum it up as
    - hey, about that road. well, it's ground level at the arena and the cc, and even a little bit more than that. that'll do for the folks who actually get a say. As for the rest, well, thanks for playing.

    yeah, I'm a cynic today. doesn't make me wrong though.

  16. Default Re: Friends for a Better Boulevard

    Quote Originally Posted by jn1780 View Post
    Is he really this ignorant, has a different definition of "ground level" or just lying through his teeth?
    He is technically telling the truth due to his use of approximation vis a vis Western Avenue, however it is a masterful act of deflection. I really think these guys are expecting us to go away and let them get back to being public engineers.

  17. Default Re: Friends for a Better Boulevard

    I just emailed Greenwell, my councilman.

  18. Default Re: Friends for a Better Boulevard


  19. #694

    Default Re: Friends for a Better Boulevard

    I know that it is just a matter of "semantics" . . . but, technically, how can a "Boulevard" not be on grade, without elevated sections? How can anyone be considering a strange rebuild of the Crosstown Expressway--except with a lower speed limit and less holes in the pavement (for awhile)?

    Since "roundabouts" or "traffic circles" seem to be anathema to some folks, how about real underpasses (short tunnels) where the N/S streets intersect the E/W Boulevard? They have at least one major tunnel in another major league city (Minneapolis). They could build-in New Orleans Style Pumps (an homage to another major league city) for when the tunnels try to flood.

    If they do end up building an elevated Crosstown Expressway 2--which they almost certainly will--they should name it The SkyDunce Bridge.

  20. #695

    Default Re: Friends for a Better Boulevard

    I may not agree with everything in this, but the "Skydunce Bridge" is hilarious!!

  21. #696

    Default Re: Friends for a Better Boulevard

    Quote Originally Posted by jn1780 View Post
    Is he really this ignorant, has a different definition of "ground level" or just lying through his teeth?
    Eric was hired by Jim Couch fresh out of college in 1994. He began his work for OKC managing MAPS projects and later became MAPS Director before recently being appointed Public Works Director. So, while he does have an engineering degree and I'm sure understands standard engineering principles quite well, his experience is that of a manager and not a design engineer. The same goes for Jim Couch. They rely on private engineering firms for design and construction of major projects.

    What we're witnessing is the fact that Eric's job also includes essentially serving as Jim Couch's public and council informational officer, which unfortunately appears to often be that of a political press secretary who has been instructed to spin the story and the facts to support the party line.

  22. #697

    Default Re: Friends for a Better Boulevard

    Okay . . . Make that The SkyDunceS' Bridge.
    (reversing the last "S" would be acceptable for the signage and bronze plaques)

  23. #698

    Default Re: Friends for a Better Boulevard

    All I know is, the more I hear and read, the less it bothers me they want to name this mess the Oklahoma City Blvd. It now seems such an appropriate name for a road that has a bit of real nice to it and the rest, well it could be oh so much more than some appear determined to permit.

  24. #699

    Default Re: Friends for a Better Boulevard

    I understand what you are saying kevin - I hate to think the city is going to once again settle for barely adequate when great is possible. We can do better and as citizens we should demand it from out city's leadership.

  25. #700

    Default Re: Friends for a Better Boulevard

    Quote Originally Posted by RadicalModerate View Post
    I know that it is just a matter of "semantics" . . . but, technically, how can a "Boulevard" not be on grade, without elevated sections? How can anyone be considering a strange rebuild of the Crosstown Expressway--except with a lower speed limit and less holes in the pavement (for awhile)?
    .
    If they build it with elevated bridges I would only consider the stretch from Walker to Gaylord "the Boulevard" with everthing else being really long interstate on and off ramps. It would make more sense to call the currently planned at-grade portion "Central Park Avenue" rather than Oklahoma City Boulevard.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. First Dates, Old Friends
    By RealJimbo in forum Nostalgia & Memories
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 03-25-2010, 11:05 PM
  2. Compassionate Friends
    By Karried in forum Current Events & Open Topic
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-14-2007, 09:14 AM
  3. Friends are Friends forever
    By Keith in forum Current Events & Open Topic
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-11-2007, 09:30 PM
  4. Your Married Friends
    By Leon in forum Current Events & Open Topic
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-18-2006, 10:07 PM
  5. Just Friends
    By Karried in forum Arts & Entertainment
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-28-2005, 01:43 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO