T-Mobile Park - Capacity - 47,929[, (MLB Seattle Mariners), built in 1997 cost $517 million (former name: Safeco Field) owner, Washington State Major League Baseball Stadium Public Facilities District.
Lumen Field - Capacity - 68,740, (NFL Seattle Seahawks), built in 2002, cost $430 million (former names: Qwest Field, CenturyLink Field, owner, Washington State Public Stadium Authority.
Does Oklahoma City need to delay building the MAPS 4 Multipurpose Stadium and look at some kind of Trust or Stadium Authority. Tulsa has a Stadium Improvement District (TSID).
I'd say OKC should stay the course, build the Maps 4 stadium since it's approved/voted on, and focus on being a 2 team city for a while, OKC Thunder/NBA (obviously) and OKC Energy/MLS. My hope is that the stadium be built somewhere south of the river near Wheeler or thereabouts; throwing a bone to the southside and giving this attraction to the main audience who will attend.
Hopefully the stadium will be built at 15,000 and could be expanded (to say 30,000) should we land an MLS franchise. The stadium could also host local/college soccer/tournaments and perhaps also HS football. This is perfect for an OKC that's 720,000+/1.5m (say in 2023), two teams that are heavily supported along with OU, OSU, and OCU sports.
Once OKC gets above 2m metro then I think we could start talking about an NFL stadium.
Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!
USL Oklahoma City Energy FC's status is up in the air following next season.
Agree, the MAPS 4 Multipurpose Stadium should begin with a minimum seating capacity of 15,000 which could be expanded to a much larger 30,000 (bonds), with an option to expand near the 65,000 seat range funded thru MAPS 5 in 2028. OKC metro could easily surpass 1.6 million by the next census in 2030.
I don't think you need to wait on a 2 million MSA since you already have a funding mechanism in place. Like the Paycom Center, you build the structure and add amenities . The MAPS 4 Multipurpose Stadium was proposed to be expanded as needed for soccer, American Football etc... OKC needs to decide on a site plan.
You really believe the Thunder is the biggest act in town? From what I've heard recently that doesn't seem to be the case at all. I'm pretty big into college football and listen to a lot of sports radio during the season. So I've been slowly stopping listening because all the radio stations around seem to be talking more college basketball, which I'm not a big follower of. The only times I've honestly heard the Thunder mentioned is when they are making fun of how bad they lost. I used to talk a decent amount of Thunder to the other sports fans in my life, and I've noticed we really haven't talked about the Thunder since Westbrook left. So I guess what I'm saying is I hope you are right and they do still have a lot of following, cause from what I've been seeing and hearing lately is telling me that no one cares about the Thunder anymore...and I don't want that to be the case.
Man, this is all WAY off topic. Sorry, I guess I started it by mentioning an eventual need for a new arena might be in the calculations for disposition of the former Myriad/Cox Center.
It's not tax credits, it's a straight-up 20-38% rebate.
You can see the details here:
https://www.ep.com/production-incentives/us/oklahoma/
From what I understand (hearsay only) we currently have among the best incentives in the country. There has been real public effort in recent years to lean into this industry.
The Thunder are doing just fine. Nearly every NBA team is suffering from lower attendance because of Covid. Even the Brooklyn Nets, a team with KD, James Harden, and Kyrie Irving, have sold $10 seats this season to get people in the door. When Covid is less of an issue, wins will fill Paycom up. The Thunder rebuild is coming along faster than a lot of people expected. Lots of future salary cap room to play with, and just a couple of draft picks or trades away from being right back in the thick of it. Get your tickets now.
It was just a few years ago that Oklahoma reduced their film incentive program, so thoughts on that have obviously changed at the capitol.
https://www.ncsl.org/research/fiscal...-programs.aspx
"In fiscal year (FY) 2018, Colorado, Maryland and Texas reduced the annual appropriation available for film incentive programs. Oklahoma reduced its annual program cap from $5 million to $4 million."
That was under the previous administration and legislature, whose overarching main theme was austerity. In 2019 the legislature restored some of what was taken away, and then in 2021 the "Filmed in Oklahoma Act" happened:
https://www.okcommerce.gov/oklahoma-...tv-incentives/
https://www.oklahoman.com/story/ente...ws/5180302001/
https://okfilmmusic.org/incentives/
There is plenty to take issue with regarding the current legislature and administration, but they have definitely gotten a few things right, including a renewed focus on the tourism industry AND a recognition that certain incentives such as ones targeting the film industry can have ROI in the multiples. This isn't intended to be political in any way, but I personally credit the Lt. Governor for much of this.
Yes for a few years it was labeled as a giveaway to Hollywood liberals. OCPA criticized that Harvey Weinstein benefitted from our state rebates, so it just had to be shut down. Then we saw what was happening in New Mexico and everything changed. Funny how politics can be like that.
A few years ago Oklahoma commissioned a study on most if not all of the state-funded incentive programs, and the analysis showed that both film industry incentives and historic preservation incentives consistently showed ROI in the multiples. As in I think one of them showed a $7 return for every dollar spent. It will take some time for film to be a major economic driver, but this is definitely one of the paths to diversifying the local and state economies.
Most states really up the incentives for productions that film in rural areas.
The reason being is almost all those areas are economically depressed and production pumps in tons of needed revenue for all types of businesses: hotels, restaurants, and various stores.
And then, because the shows usually feature beautiful rural settings, tourism often follows. This was very much the case for Yellowstone (first in Utah, they moved to Montana for better incentives) and is sure to happen for 6666, the Yellowstone spin-off that will be filmed on the massive 6666 Ranch in Texas, about midway between Lubbock and Witchita Falls.
As usual, there is a corollary Simpsons episode:
A friend of mine who lives in LA is a dancer and actor and is married to an actress. They bought a house in LA four years ago for around $600,000, they are selling it for $1.2MM and moving to OKC, specifically because of Prairie surf and what they are bringing in to OKC. With the sale of their property, they will buy a house in NW OKC for cash and get three times the square footage. They have talked to a few of their actor friends in LA and it seems like others are looking to do the same.
Always good news to hear.
very good to hear and also that they've convinced others about OKC. Should help solve the relative lack of skill in the sector while hopefully the OKC area schools can get going with classes and programs.
Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!
^ yes, that. lol
Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!
There are currently 15 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 15 guests)
Bookmarks