I would think that "fake" NIL would be easy to get around. I imagine most boosters with enough money to pay a player big bucks have some way to channel that money through some kind of "player advertises something" deal.
https://x.com/On3sports/status/18687...7Ctwgr%5Etweet
On3 on Mateer to OU.
But can it? A CBA would be a legal agreement between an association of the schools and a union of the players. Including donors in that would be very difficult and probably wouldn't stand up in court since the donors aren't employees of either. The courts have already ruled that the NCAA can't interfere with players receiving NIL, even as a part of recruiting. So why would the courts reverse that for any other association of schools. A CBA can't override legal decisions.
for a CBA to happen, the players would have to become employees of the university, which opens up one set of legal ramifications that universities don't want to take on, nor do the players, and a cba only works if it includes all sports, not just football, and football isn't going to give that power to rowing teams.
I think the conferences and schools are anxious to get the money defined and under control. Boosters have been allowed to operate because it wasn't. When players and the schools agree on a system that benefits both, and maximizes distribution to the players, then the NIL will fall under control.
only if the separate from the State owned universities. private schools might see this. but there is no way they become state employees of the universities. the regulatory hurdles, state compliance issues, and new rules that would impose on the players, is all just too much to overcome. OU football would have to separate from the University of Oklahoma legally for that to happen. all football programs around the country would.
The big schools with lots of pull, the ones in the top 20 usually. Are they really anxious to get NIL under control when it doesn't cost them anything and gets the top players to play for them. A CBA would likely equalize things to some extent and do the big boys really want that? The players seem to be fine with the current system because they're the ones that have sued to block interference. Maybe us fans, the smaller schools and the unpaid players are the ones most worried about the system being broken. Even though it definitely is.
exactly this... the players don't want to unionize, because it will even things out amongst all sports, or amongst all teams, and the big schools don't want it either. they would rather just see how things play out. a CBA isn't coming anytime soon for college sports
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Bookmarks