I think this is a very short-sighted point of view. This park will be servicing a growing city, in particular one whose downtown is booming right now. It's not only for the Oklahoma City of a couple years hence when it's completed, but also for the OKC of 5 years from now, 10 years, 20 years, 50 years, 100 years... It is absolutely not oversized in my opinion.
Is the plan to keep the Festival of the Arts on the current stretch of Hudson if and when the Stage Center is demolished and hopefully a new tower is built?
There is such a thing as too much urban parkland.
BTW - Will Rogers Park is a well known local used condom trash can.
If anyone cares to read it, here is the entire presentation:
http://www.okc.gov/AgendaPub/cache/2...3023053129.PDF
Well, the debate is kind of pointless because the park is going to be built. My objection has been duly noted and entered into the public record.
I went through all 300 pages of the report. Pretty interesting.
Kinda have to, to see if their trying to influence or inform our streetcar process above and/or beyond the verbal statements to us of late.
But yeah, I would have rather been doing something else actually. Lol
Possibly, but it would be more difficult than you realize. The whole reason they moved it to it's current location was in large part due to the amount of damage the festival was doing to the grounds in front of the theatre. Due to the Spring "Festival" rains, I can remember going more than once to the Fesitval having to walk on improvised 4x8 plywood sidewalks, a real "mud fest". The great lawn in front of the stage shell is already beginning to "wear thin" from constant use. The tents that the festival uses are made to be accessed - or used - from all 4 sides. So, fronting them on sidewalks would not work. What they could do is shut down the road between Devon and the Myriad Gardens, that would be much more suitable.
This one works. http://db.tt/gE1YtTEX
I'm sure this has been asked before, but what's the reasoning behind the really weird shape of the lower half of the park? Why does the two-block wide upper park not simply continue to the river? That would look and function much better.
The substation will undoubtedly be covered up.
As a whole (based on this thread only) there seems to be significant dissatisfaction with the design, connectivity & lack of preservation in the new park. Is there enough dissatisfaction to organize a grassroots citizen group to formally suggest changes?
I am planning on going. There are a few of us that are going to try to make the meeting. I brought up the Film Exchange building in January, and the head landscape architect basically dismissed me. She made it sound like we are lucky they saved Union Station and that it was in the way as well.
They didn't make any changes after that meeting. NONE! They have done their own thing and have not taken any public input as far as the design.
Was a golf course ever discussed with this project? Would be really cool to have a downtown course.
There are currently 25 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 25 guests)
Bookmarks