I've really done my dardness to avoid political discussions here. Most often, they are pointless and, usually, harmless. Such things are not "my thing". Among other things, "I like world peace," (ala Sandra Bullock) even if it never happens.
But did any of you see the Tom Browkaw piece on the Discovery Channel last night? And, right, many politicos, republican or democrat, doubt or ignore the existence of empirical data about global warming and its consequences within 50 or certainly 100 years from today which could result in a sci-fi reality movie were it captured before the dawn of the event? If you've not seen the Brokaw Discovery Channel program, if you have an open mind and if you can handle future terror-shock, you really should have a look. It is not a comfortable thing to see. I'm one who likes "comforatable things to see", 100%.
Maybe the theme of the Brokaw program was "believe me, we're looking at world-wide disaster by the year 2,100" (94 years from today), and maybe it wasn't. But we'd all be forceably sticking not only our heads, but also our children's and grandchildren's heads, in the sand if we gave it no heed all and failed to look at what the politicians seem to be reluctant to do.
I mean, we're talking about a possible cataclysmic devistation of your chidren, or grandchildren, and mine. Wouldn't you say that's a REALLY SERIOIUS toic?That's not so far away from our present "day". The immediacy of this possibility is just plain "scarey". Don't we have a duty, for those we care for, to look at the issue very very closly, and not just accpet what those who are running for office present to us in a comfortable no-think kind of way. I'm not saying who's right or wrong, but I am saying that is your duty to "think" ... to obtain data as you can, and make your best judgment.
So, whether Brokaw's Discovery Channel program presented correct or incorrect information, don't we have at least have a duty, for our offspring, to evaluate it very seriously?>Is Brokaw (and, actually his report relied upon scientists quoted there and upon which is report was drawn) right or wrong?
I'm not a person skilled in the knowledge of those presented in Brokaw's Discovery Channel program. So, my contribution to the scientific debate is zilch.
But, caring (as I do) for my immediate progeny, maybe even a little more than I care for myself, I'm certainly not willing, even if its painful, to be unattentive to what these scientists (not Brokaw, a reporter) had and have to say in this program. It's not an issue of "believing", it's an issue of parental responsibilty.
Switch gears to the politcal.
Aside from the above, politically speaking, every now and then, my sensitivies get piqued so much so that I feel a need to say something. This is such a time. I guess than I'm loading up here with 2 disctincly different issues. One has been described above.
I've never had (to my knowledge) a Pizza Town pizza. I've wondered about it (as to whether it was good "pizza"), but I've never wondered about it politically.
But, in honor of this thread, I'm for sure gonna get me some based on the pizza-quality reports, as opposed to the quasi-or-not-s-quasi-political stuff that I've read in this thread ...and after doing so, I'll give a report as to the succulence and good/bad taste of the pizza.
Maybe tomorrow, but, if not tomorrow, soon.
Americans are Americans, and anyone who is an "American" is good enough for me, whatever their national stripe, religion, creed, race, or national origin.
Should we start wondering about interning Dr. Zhuidi (sp?)? God help us, if anyone says so.
Some parts of this thread bring to mind the Japanese internment "camps" (i.e., prisons) in WWII. Is that what we want to be, and don't we want to be better than that, today?
Please, tell me that I'm not out of line in saying these kinds of things. This is America. This is America. This is America. I said it 3x to pinch myself and hope that it was (is) so).
Bookmarks