and I gave you a answer way back in the start but you kept it going.
and I gave you a answer way back in the start but you kept it going.
I'd feel the same way she did. There are better ways for the worker to handle the situation than making assumptions of the worst case.
Yep, some people don't know how to set difference aside for a while or at least filter their comments in the name of decency.
This thread is unbelievable. There really are some rotten, horrible, thoughtless people in this world.
Um...kind of belated - "welcome back"!
(Kinda glad I didn't post my experiences with the tornadoes)
Two things....
1. Often insurance (or the lack thereof in this case) is a qualifier or disqualified for aid from some organizations (like FEMA). So, don't necessarily take it that the poster was implying anything else.
2. Its a valid question. I for one have insurance and was effected by the May 3rd tornado years ago. I couldn't have imagined taking aid from the Red Cross's coffers because I was fully insured and received money immediately from my insurance provider.
They are required to tell everyone to not use it on cigarettes, alcohol or firearms. I was told this and did not feel like any assumptions were being made and it didn't even phase me. I was more concerned with how wonderful it was to get money I could use to help me get necessities that I lost.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks