Originally Posted by
Hawk405359
It'd have been far better than continuing steering the conversation to the guy being a donor at OSU and trying to tie him as closely as you could to the athletic program, including actually taking the time to find a picture of him with Boone Pickens (because that's relevant to the guy beating his kid somehow?)
I don't care how big of a booster he is, it's not right or wrong, smart or dumb, or anything else for the athletic department to make a statement or not make a statement. The fact that a college athletic department has to come out against someone who abused their child as though doing anything else makes them pro-kid-beating is ludicrous to me. And the fact that you're harping so much on that angle just makes it look like the only reason you posted this thread was because it was an OSU fan involved and you have an innate desire to make sure there's as much bad OSU news as you can get out there.
When we get to the point where people get so obsessed that they tie their lives so closely to the athletic exploits of college age students, we get cases like this. Would I be upset if they said something? No, I'd be entirely indifferent. Everyone should be completely indifferent to the response of a college athletic program to a guy beating his kid for being for not being a fan. It doesn't matter. He's not an employee of the university, he's not using university facilities, he's a guy with deep pockets who did something despicable, and only represents the fact that he's a guy with deep pockets who did something despicable. He could be a KU, OU, A&M, UT, tOSU, USC, ND, or Harvard fan, and it'd be equally as irrelevant to those universities.
We don't need to be told that they officially find his actions to be wrong. Anyone with a pulse and a conscience finds his actions to be wrong.
Bookmarks