Widgets Magazine
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 29 of 29

Thread: Steve jabs at Randy Hogan a little in this article.

  1. Default Re: Steve jabs at Randy Hogan a little in this article.

    As if we weren't aware of his absence in this forum or site for that matter. Thankyou Steve for that enlightenment.

  2. Default Re: Steve jabs at Randy Hogan a little in this article.

    Quote Originally Posted by Urban Pioneer View Post
    I heard from my next door neighbor that LIT Clothing in the Centennial building is gone. I am going to go by today and see if its true.
    so is it there!? i went to the store just last saturday, i didnt notice any big going out of business sale signs.

  3. #28
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    7,476
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Steve jabs at Randy Hogan a little in this article.

    Cowan is asked about criticism of the undeveloped land and surface parking lots in my story.
    OK, but he does offer a solution. He certainly did not answer the question you posed to the forum which was, "How would you develop the existing surface parking lots in a manner that would end up with more, and not less, parking or access to parking, than what exists currently?"

    Your article had a couple of people raise the concern of surface parking lots (Cowan actually did not mention it). When people here shared those same concerns, you asked for solutions. That's perfectly reasonable (except maybe the part about qualifying our intelligence based on the answers). It's so reasonable, in fact, that I assumed you would have asked the same question of the people raising the same concern in your article, especially since these are people who might have some ability to actually implement or influence a real solution. I was just interested in what they said.

    If I missed the proposed solution offered by Mr. Cowan or Mr. Humphries in the above article then I am sorry and feel free to copy and paste it in a response for us. The closest thing to a solution mentioned in the article is that Cowan and the Bricktown Association are paying someone else to come up with a master plan. Whether that will address existing surface lots remains to be seen.
    He has told me it's unlikely he'll ever comment on this site and from all appearances he doesn't visit it either
    Clearly, I was kidding, hence the wink. I was trying to make a joke that his comments would be primarily to serve the thread, when we all clearly know it's the least of his concern.

  4. #29
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    7,476
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Steve jabs at Randy Hogan a little in this article.

    OK, but he does offer a solution.
    Sorry, that was supposed to be "he does NOT answer your question."

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Downtown Housing article
    By metro in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-18-2007, 09:35 PM
  2. Downtown Living Article
    By Blangdon in forum Current Events & Open Topic
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-16-2007, 12:14 PM
  3. Randy Hogan is a joke
    By Patrick in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 66
    Last Post: 03-20-2006, 03:46 PM
  4. Randy Hogan....
    By BricktownGuy in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 12-08-2004, 01:15 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO