Originally Posted by
foodiefan
pretty sure I'm not going to change anyone's mind, but would like to offer up a couple of points. . .Tinker was "established" on donated land; Glenwood area at athe end of the NS runway was "cleared" by a bond issue; the Navy complex was built on land initially purchased by the County. Had the last two factors (Glenwood/Navy) not ocurred, I'm not sure Tinker would still be operational. . . and "our" jobs would probably have gone to San Antonio (Kelly) which would still be open.
As another poster stated, this is a very complex issue, but the bottom line is not very different from the NBA. . .are we willing to "step up" (as we have in the past) and provide the "incentive" for the Air Force and private industry to continue to invest in the federal aerospace industry in the Oklahoma City area. . .or will they elect to look elsewhere? The Rockwell's, Boeing's, et al, are in the Oklahoma City area BECAUSE of Tinker and the Air Logistics Center. The AF/military is not significantly different that any major business/industry (or the NBA). . .they have to look at the bottom line. . .if other communities are willing to foster/invest, then that is where they want to be. So. . .I'm voting YES. . . on all propositions.
Bookmarks