Yeah I agree they would need to change all these laws, but my real question was vague I guess. Is there new movement in the legislature to actually do this?Originally Posted by BDP
Yeah I agree they would need to change all these laws, but my real question was vague I guess. Is there new movement in the legislature to actually do this?Originally Posted by BDP
BDP,
The effects are not so cut and dried. You can find successful liquor stores in all of the states in which you can buy wine in grocery stores. Look no further than Tejas, for example.
Liquor stores would merely have to be more specialized in their product offerings than grocers. This is inherently doable for the enterprising.
I would imagine, however, that their profit margins would suffer, and a lot of the smaller stores would just go away. Byron's isn't going anywhere, but your local corner store might be really threatened here.Originally Posted by soonerguru
I think a great comprimise would be to offer Oklahoma Wine inside Oklahoma Grocery stores. At least this way, we could support small businesses (and farmers) in Oklahoma as opposed to supporting national chains versus the little guy.
Midtowner,
Such a compromise would be a step forward, but it wouldn't achieve the desired result: we would be no closer in luring a Whole Foods or a Costco-type retailer.
I fear that in the absence of this change, we are not going to see the improvements we all hope for in this area.
Actually, that was my point. You can have succussful liquor stores and still sell liquor in grocery stores. But, they have to have the sam opportunities to be competitive. If groceries stores are allowed to compete with the liquor stores, but the liquor stores are limited in their capacity to compete by not being allowed to sell certain items, then they will suffer. I am all for liquor and wine in grocery stores and I think these smaller stores can survive as well, but they have to be allowed to compete in the same capacity as other retail establishments who may be allowed to sell liquor.You can find successful liquor stores in all of the states in which you can buy wine in grocery stores. Look no further than Tejas, for example.
That's why I said they should be able to sell whatever they want, however they want, and whenever they want(or at least at the same times as any store selling liquor) and be able to have more than one storefront or even franchise. I think the liquor stores would have a valid complaint if chains (which they can't be) were allowed to sell liquor (which is all they are allowed to sell) along with any other consumer goods (which they can't sell). If restrictions are lifted on grocery stores, restrictions should also be lifted on liquor stores, imo. Open the market.
I don't think our state government works by making bold moves. Legislators do their damndest to stay on the good side of lobbyists. The liquor store lobby is real, the Oklahoma wine lobby is there. If they can protect most of the liquor store monopoly while helping to expand local industry, I think we can be a baby-step in the right direction.Originally Posted by soonerguru
Change is not made in sweeping reforms. It's made in a series of (seemingly) tiny baby steps. We'll get there, but first things first.
I guess the $64,000 question is finding out, specifically, what the numbers are telling them..Which is disuading Costco from entering the Oklahoma City market..Originally Posted by Midtowner
The Whole Foods Market, which has been open in Omaha for about 1 year, has been a big hit..I'd find it hard to believe it's opening a store in Oklahoma City would be anything less than a smashing success..
..Ciao..LiO....Peace
My understanding is that they're not 'disuaded.' It's just that they can only expand their operations (think supply chain) at a given rate. That being the case, they choose to expand in markets first where they think they'll enjoy the most success saving markets where they'll have to deal with stiff competition for later.
I imagine OKC is on the list of places Costco wants to expand to. I imagine we're just not near the top of that list.
I have heard that Whole Foods has issues with the distance from distribution centers
That sounds a bit odd. We have a Whole Foods in St. Louis -- just one single location -- and I can't imagine that there's a distribution center any closer to us than OKC would be from Whole Foods' HQ in Texas.Originally Posted by Shake2005
Whole Foods does have wine and beer in their store here, however I don't believe it represents enough of a share of inventory to make the OK liquor laws a dealbreaking factor in locating stores there. Trader Joe's might be another story. We've got four so far and their wine department certainly does have a significant enough presence that they might not be interested in setting up shop under the present liquor laws. I think either Whole Foods or TJ's would do quite well in the OKC marketplace although I'd hate it if their arrival came at the expense of one of my personal favorites - Crescent Market.
For that you are indeed correct. However, my point is: such incremental steps will not give us the desired results, a Costco or Whole Foods type retailer.Change is not made in sweeping reforms. It's made in a series of (seemingly) tiny baby steps. We'll get there, but first things first.
But yet Omaha seemingly is..I just don't see much of a difference in the two market demographics..I have to belive there is something else in play here..Originally Posted by Midtowner
What it is..I have no idea..
..Ciao..LiO....Peace
You know, Costco isnt really that big of deal. Im not sure why so many are so concerned about it. Yes, it would be great to get some competition into OKC but there are other Sam's competitors - like BJ's and many other east coast staples.
What is the big deal about Costco? If they dont wanna touch OKC for the fear of Walmart - good riddence!
We need to make sure SONIC does not enter Seattle for the same reasons they gave us. (Spokane just got the first Sonic in Washington State).![]()
Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!
For the love of God, this is NOT why they are not here. It's the freakin' liquor laws! GEEZ!If they dont wanna touch OKC for the fear of Walmart - good riddence!
that is what I said in post 38.Originally Posted by soonerguru
But in all honesty, the liquor in COSTCO is not that wonderful or anything. It's the same stuff you can get anywhere.
While it may be true that the underlying reason they aren't here is because of the laws, I still say good riddence to them; they're not all that anyways (besides the gas).
Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!
If it's liquor laws that's keeping major players like Costco and Whole Foods Market from entering the Oklahoma City market..
That is cause for developmental concern..
..Ciao..LiO....Peace
I will grant the liquor laws are obsolete, however, what proof do you have to back your claim of the laws being the reason for denial into this market?
i dont have any proof, it just seems funny that they would say demographics is the reason. what the heck are they looking for??? OKC has over 2900 people per square mile in its urbanized area, a metro area of 1.3M, and a market concatchment that has over 5M.
I would think these "chains" would be steadily knocking on the door such that we'd be in the position to pick and chose who we wanted.
I think the NBA will turn things around for OKC from this prospective - in that no one thought the city could pull of what we are doing with the Hornets.
But it just amazes me to keep hearing demographics as an excuse when these same companies have locations in far less desireable cities than OKC.
Oklahoma City, the RENAISSANCE CITY!
They aren't here?Originally Posted by mranderson
We just had a second Costco open up in June here in South Austin, a mile away from a Sams. The one in North Austin has been there ever since I moved here from OKC 3.5 years ago. We are members at both, since both have some basic items that we get it just depends on those other items that are not shared as to which one we go to or sometimes it just comes down to which one we are closer to.
As to liquor laws, Texas has its shre of screwy laws also, just look at Dallas and their wet/dry areas by voting distict. The wet line on Greenville just north of Royal Lane and the town of Buckingham as the "wet" area between Dallas and Richardson is just ridiculous. That is not a problem here as Travis County is wet.
As far as grocery store wine departments go, only Whole Foods and HEB-Central Market have wine departments on par with all but the whole in the wall liquor stores. There are many that specialize in wine and especially stocking Texas vineyards, most have the space and expertise that you just can't find at most grocery stores. The locals can survive and thrive if they try to do something more than just exist, which is what it seems like most of the ones there just want to do. There are already ones that do more like Beau's at May & Grand.
Aren’t they the ones owned by the Venezuelan government and want to destroy the US?
ETL: Who is "they"? Bluedogok refers to several companies in his post, so your question is very unclear.
I think he/she is confusing Costco with Citgo.
--------------
There could be hundreds of reasons for a company not to be in a market. Just because "they are not here" is not proof. Therefore, it is clear you have no proof.Originally Posted by Swake2
Sure would be nice to get rid of those liquor laws though![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks