This is based on future traffic projections and is an attempt at ODOT staying ahead of the curve before it needed.
This is based on future traffic projections and is an attempt at ODOT staying ahead of the curve before it needed.
I am sure there are quite a lot of traffic studies with future projections and economic impact studies. I don't think this kind of project would go forward without it.
For future economic growth, the better the infrastructure connecting the DFW and OKC metro areas the more we will benefit. Highways, high speed train, freight trains, etc. Connection equals enhanced markets and possibilities.
It would probably be easier to add lanes to the new bridges than the mess we’ve all dealt with with the replacement of the old bridges. They can usually add lanes to the new more modern design bridges. This is what they did to a lot of the bridges along the tollway along memorial
OK, l am only just asking the question because l don't recall this earlier in the thread ..... how about a 3rd &/or 4th lane toll lane for most of the Red River to Norman segment? What's adding another billion or so to the upcoming toll road program and let users pay for the widening?
Please don’t suggest toll lanes. Keep that crap in Colorado. That start is the dumbest one in the entire country for all the toll lanes they build. What a joke. I’d rather it take 50 more years than it open tomorrow with a toll lane. GTFO here with that sh!t.
I'm with Plutonic...no tolls. We have enough of that mess now.
TX has gone insane with them. The days of people calling TX roads so good are long since past too. The good roads are the tolls ones and they just let the regular ones fall to pieces....or take 30 years to complete a simple project. When is the last time you saw a decent shoulder on BOTH sides in any urban area? They eat those up for toll express lanes. 635 is a damned joke with the way they did that.
I work with someone that lives on the Ft Worth side, but had to go to the north side (Plano) for a meeting. 2 hr commute and it cost him $40 one way. Better to get a hotel and stay overnight next time.
TX isn't building anything new that's not a toll either. It's insane.
No, it wasn’t unhinged or inappropriate. Thicken you skin a little. I love mugofbeer I just think hes been in Colorado too long. Go to Colorado and enjoy their sh!tty roads. Toll lanes on I-25 between Colorado Springs and Denver. Toll lanes on I-25 to Fort Collins now. Toll lanes on the 470. Toll lanes on fu€king I-70 everywhere. It wouldn’t be so bad if they’d add more than one each way but they don’t. Someone at CDOT has a serious toll lane boner they can’t rid of and it’s my problem as I’ve spent almost a thousand dollars by this point over two years on this crap.
All they seem to do is add a single express lane it needs direction and one slow poke, screws the entire thing up and it makes it worse than the main lines. Please don’t bring that crap Oklahoma or spread it elsewhere. Texas is adding toll lanes, but usually they are two lanes in each direction with some exceptions. otherwise they have reversible toll lanes that are also two lanes. Arizona is doing this on I-17.
Please no tolls and Mug me and you need to grab a brew and step into a boxing arena for you suggesting that.
Sorry, PP, I didn't really enjoy that kind of response, either.
The drive between Denver and the Springs is fine now because people now have a choice to use the free lanes, which are still there and the toll lane has taken much of the congestion away. Without the toll option there would still be 2 lanes of gridlock. I simply think l-35 between Norman and the Red River needs some out of the box thinking.
How angry are you about 18-wheeler only lanes?
I'd be game for adding toll lanes in the middle of 35. There's plenty of room they could do a four-lane turnpike right down the middle and they could do plenty of on-and-offs like the HOV toll lanes in the Dallas area. Doing something like this would also alleviate congestion for wrecks as responders could simply move thru traffic to the unimpeded lanes. 635 in Dallas is great how NTTA and TxDOT has partnered with that. Don't want to drive it then don't and don't pay. It's pretty simple. I'd use it often. I agree with Mug, there does need to be some out of box thinking.
If tolls were an option, I would only suggest for just south of Norman all the way to Edmond adding a lane of traffic each direction. The tolls would pay for the additional costs while lessening congestion. Is it a perfect solution? No. Is it more feasible then some quadruple stack multi level highway? Yes.
As for South of Norman to the RR, definitely think they should expand in smaller sections from S of Norman a few miles and RR up to Ardmore. Between that there isn’t much need for the next 10-15 years.
It wouldn’t be as bad if they added two toll lanes, and each direction as opposed to one. Problem is you get one slow poke and it screws the entire game.
I’m sorry about the response. Seems like people on this site are becoming very soft lately. I don’t see the big deal but if I offended you my bad.
At any rate, this conversations is pointless, because I would be very very surprised if ODOT did that. I’M PRETTY SURE IT WOULD REQUIRE A CHANGE IN STATE LAW FOR ODOT TO OWN AN OPERATE TOll FACILITIES. And why that last sentence just changed to uppercase. I have no idea my phone just did that.
I don’t really mind 18 wheeler only lanes, but those are a few and far between. The ones that I’ve been on automobiles are allowed to drive on them as well so that’s more lanes for traffic. I often enjoy driving around 18 wheelers anyways because they’re better drivers except for when they pass each other going 0.5 miles an hour than the one next to them.
Now I do wish we would have laws and cities that would prohibit the use of semi trucks in the left lane on freeways that have three or more lanes.
Again I need to emphasize I’m not as opposed to toll lanes in general, as I am when a situation arises where there’s only a single toll lane each way. In Dallas for example or out here in LA. They have toll lanes that I use all the time and love that have 2 to 3 lanes each way. I’m fine with those.
And I don’t know how often you’re driving the 25 between Colorado Springs and Denver but I was just on it and it did jack sh!t to help with traffic congestion at least when I was on it. And of course exactly as I said some dude in a Prius was going the same speed as the regular lanes were yes which traffic was moving about 20-25 miles an hour.
And you know what if a state like Arizona or Utah can figure out how to build roads without needing tolls to do it I’m sure Oklahoma can too. People in Oklahoma just love tolls, don’t you? In Colorado since that state can’t seem to figure out how to build a single new lane without using tolls to finance it, even though it’s one of the richest states in the country. Things like that don’t add up to me.
Utah and Arizona don't seem to have near the number of state highways that Oklahoma does to maintain. Due to Oklahoma being "spread out" with small towns dotting the entire state, we seem to have more miles to maintain than Arizona and Utah that have large areas of "nothing" so it is easier to focus efforts on road projects.
I don't love tolls in Oklahoma, but it seems its the only way to build a decently maintained road.
The toll projections from OKC to Tulsa don't look great...
https://kfor.com/news/local/ota-toll...urnpike-users/
That is true, but maybe Oklahoma doesn’t need so many roads going in every direction. It would also help if people would be a bit more progressive and investing and infrastructure, raising the fuel tax and allowing ODOT to take out bonds to finance construction projects.
You know I was thinking about stacking myself. You could create an express toll with an elevated highway the length of 35 (and getting around that messy downtown shuffle). It doesn't have to fully follow the main 35 path the entire way. It doesn't in Dallas either.
ODOT has said its cost prohibitive to do any widening on 35 (and i think 44...at least north of 40). So stacking may be the only way to get this done. It would be an absolute nightmare to drive while it was built though. At least 1 lane each way closed that entire project.
Now is that gonna happen? no. But hey...think outside the box huh?
I made a map on detours people can take.
https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/ed...q4&usp=sharing
Also regarding this imagine frontage roads from Gainesville up to Norman where they exist now. There would be exceptions to this like through the Arbuckles if they did that they’re growth in DFW and Oklahoma City would skyrocket
I am pretty skeptical frontage roads would change much for most of the region between Norman/Gainesville, for medium size cities and suburbs near freeways it does give more capacity to draw additional businesses that can cater to interstate traffic and locals, though often those would just go on the mile grid roads that are near ramps if there are not frontage roads. Plus there is plenty of examples in Texas where there is little to no more population/business draw to long sections of freeways with frontage roads, more traffic, and relatively near to metro areas.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Bookmarks