Originally Posted by
Zuplar
I mostly agree with your comments.
The thought I have on your last comment is for those tribes that are doing very well, the reason to extend tribal citizenship could be to further their sovereignty. Completely controlling their boundaries similar to a state would really change peoples perceptions on the strength of the tribes. From my understanding the tribes see themselves as equal to the state of Oklahoma. I think in reality this is a stretch because again they don't really control their jurisdiction the same way other states do and in that regard they are dependent on the state of Oklahoma. This affirmation of their reservations has changed IMO the status quo I grew up with, that the tribes reservations weren't really reservations in the traditional sense. Since Mcgirt, the Tribes seem to have a renewed since of establishing their place as equals to the state of Oklahoma. If that is indeed the case the next step may be for them to claim all those living within their boundaries as tribal citizens.
My thought is if I'm a non-native, living in a newly affirmed reservation, I still don't really care about the tribes, because I don't have a say in any matters. Sure there are plenty of projects the tribes do that both directly and indirectly effect non-natives, this isn't the same IMO. Now if all of a sudden I can vote on projects similar to how I can for the city, county, and state I live in, I think you get a lot more bye in from the population.
With all that being said, I can definitely see why the Tribes and their citizens wouldn't want to incorporate non-natives. Non-native interests could slowly erode those and usurp those interests traditionally help by the Tribe. My guess is this is the sole major reason keeping such a thing from happening. But at the end of the day I don't see how these Tribes are every seen as more than what they are if they have less rights than every other government in the USA, and by that I'm referring to their jurisdiction over non-natives.
Bookmarks