Widgets Magazine
Page 17 of 19 FirstFirst ... 1213141516171819 LastLast
Results 401 to 425 of 460

Thread: May 2024 - General Weather Discussion

  1. #401

    Default Re: May 2024 - General Weather Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by PoliSciGuy View Post
    8-9pm local was always the main window, so we are far from out of the woods yet. Dewpoints/temps still more than enough to kick off another round in SW/W OK
    I would have sworn the NWS map I saw said OKC was 7-8? Maybe the maps have changed during the day.

  2. #402

    Default Re: May 2024 - General Weather Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by SoonerDave View Post
    I would have sworn the NWS map I saw said OKC was 7-8? Maybe the maps have changed during the day.
    Yeah you’re right. Models hinted at storms firing at 7 in okc.

  3. #403

    Default Re: May 2024 - General Weather Discussion

    After a brief rainshower maybe 30 mins ago, clouds are kinda breaking up here from my little knothole in SW OKC. Not clearing or anything, just clouds have lightened and and it's just breezy. Temp is still 81.

  4. #404

    Default Re: May 2024 - General Weather Discussion

    Bottom of the 9th two strikes… it’s almost over. Some airmass questions, that’s why there’s a pitch left.

  5. #405

    Default Re: May 2024 - General Weather Discussion

    Absolutely unreal that we can’t get some decent rain today. Dewpoints still around 73 with a very active atmosphere. That cap has been in place over us it seems most of the season.

  6. #406

    Default Re: May 2024 - General Weather Discussion

    Fort Cobb storm now dissipating. That's all she wrote .

    Edit. May have jump the gun there.

  7. #407

    Default Re: May 2024 - General Weather Discussion

    Jim Gardner needs to retire. The dude is such a drag on tv. Seems really grouchy and I feel like he’s been caught a few times complaining about David or something when his mic goes hot.

  8. #408

    Default Re: May 2024 - General Weather Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by C_M_25 View Post
    Jim Gardner needs to retire. The dude is such a drag on tv. Seems really grouchy and I feel like he’s been caught a few times complaining about David or something when his mic goes hot.
    I'm surprised that drones have not replaced helicopters.

  9. #409

    Default Re: May 2024 - General Weather Discussion

    So this is the second PDS tornado watch that was issued for a massive area in the state in which there were maybe one or two tornadoes…and none of them were PDS’s. I know why it was issued. It was because the HRRR really ramped up storm development. However, the NAM 3 km nailed this system pretty well…especially the big cap in place.

    I know they need to err on the side of caution on days like today, but they really need to dial these high resolution models a bit more…somehow. Maybe there will be a ton of good data from this spring to update and refine the models.

  10. #410

    Default Re: May 2024 - General Weather Discussion

    I definitely want some economist at OU to see if they could get a rough estimate of how much lost revenue there is from stores and shops closing early on days like today. My FB where I follow a lot of small local food and business shops was full of places closing up today around 3-4pm. Just curious for curious sake. I’m definitely glad they err on the side of caution.

  11. #411

    Default Re: May 2024 - General Weather Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by C_M_25 View Post
    So this is the second PDS tornado watch that was issued for a massive area in the state in which there were maybe one or two tornadoes…and none of them were PDS’s. I know why it was issued. It was because the HRRR really ramped up storm development. However, the NAM 3 km nailed this system pretty well…especially the big cap in place.

    I know they need to err on the side of caution on days like today, but they really need to dial these high resolution models a bit more…somehow. Maybe there will be a ton of good data from this spring to update and refine the models.
    Yeah today did not match anyone's expectations.

  12. #412

    Default Re: May 2024 - General Weather Discussion

    If I'm not mistaken, I believe the NWS is planning to retire the HRRR model later this year, replacing with other products within what I think is called their Rapid Response Radar Sytem

  13. #413

    Default Re: May 2024 - General Weather Discussion

    I think the other thing that hurts is the somewhat archaic way in which we gather data on the atmosphere with balloon releases once/twice per day. Granted, it’s probably the only way to get data on the upper atmosphere. However, why can’t we use data from planes to get a better handle on the lower atmosphere? Or do we do that already?

  14. #414

    Default Re: May 2024 - General Weather Discussion

    NWS consistently played down the probability, while not minimizing the risk. The probability never went over 40%, prioritizing the confidence in NAM since midweek.

  15. #415

    Default Re: May 2024 - General Weather Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Blue Sky View Post
    Bottom of the 9th two strikes… it’s almost over. Some airmass questions, that’s why there’s a pitch left.
    In Stillwater, a lightning delay at Cowgirl Stadium continues to let the severe storm just to the north of Stillwater pass on by. There has been no rain at the Cowgirl Stadium. Cowgirls led Arizona 10 to 3. Game might resume at 9:30 pm.

  16. Default Re: May 2024 - General Weather Discussion

    So is OKC metro in the clear now?

  17. #417

    Default Re: May 2024 - General Weather Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by Celebrator View Post
    So is OKC metro in the clear now?
    . It appears so. Yes.

  18. #418

    Default Re: May 2024 - General Weather Discussion

    Reports of damage and injuries from tornadoes in Claremore and Valley View/Sanger, TX. As predicted isolated storms produced violent tornadoes. Thankfully the major metro areas were spared today.

  19. #419

    Default Re: May 2024 - General Weather Discussion

    Looks like we’re going to be moving into an actively rainy period over the next couple of weeks. Love rainy days!

  20. #420

    Default Re: May 2024 - General Weather Discussion

    Up here, Benton County (AR), Bentonville and Rogers were hit hard. Multiple homes and businesses gone and still residents trapped.

  21. #421

    Default Re: May 2024 - General Weather Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by C_M_25 View Post
    Looks like we’re going to be moving into an actively rainy period over the next couple of weeks. Love rainy days!
    Not good for the Women's College World Series starting Thursday of this week....

  22. #422

    Default Re: May 2024 - General Weather Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by C_M_25 View Post
    Looks like we’re going to be moving into an actively rainy period over the next couple of weeks. Love rainy days!
    Yep both the GFS and EURO show widespread 3"+ approaching 5-6" in some areas through the second week of June. Enjoy the dry and warm weather over the next few days.

  23. #423

    Default Re: May 2024 - General Weather Discussion

    This will probably be a controversial opinion, but I think the NWS needs to reconsider the value of a PDS watch.

    Here's my reasoning. These days, "PDS" conjures up the notion of a May 3, 1999 or May 2013 gigantic, grinder tornado. But when they don't occur, people ask "why did the forecast bust" even if some damaging or deadly tornadoes actually drop.

    The whole point of ANY watch is presumably, to varying degrees, inherently "dangerous." Any tornado, even a small spinup in a QLCS, carries the potential of a destructive, even deadly event, so is issuing a "PDS Tornado Watch" actually having the *reverse" effect and making a "regular" Tornado Watch less.... watchful, or seem less dangerous?

    My point is people become numb to warnings. PDS watches imply very specific conditions, but if the *public perception* of those forecasts veracity becomes jaded, it seems it's value is diminished. A Tornado Watch is inherently indicative of a dangerous situation, and if all PDS does is put the adverb "Particularly" in front of it, perhaps it's value isnt as great as intended.

  24. #424

    Default Re: May 2024 - General Weather Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by SoonerDave View Post
    This will probably be a controversial opinion, but I think the NWS needs to reconsider the value of a PDS watch.

    Here's my reasoning. These days, "PDS" conjures up the notion of a May 3, 1999 or May 2013 gigantic, grinder tornado. But when they don't occur, people ask "why did the forecast bust" even if some damaging or deadly tornadoes actually drop.

    The whole point of ANY watch is presumably, to varying degrees, inherently "dangerous." Any tornado, even a small spinup in a QLCS, carries the potential of a destructive, even deadly event, so is issuing a "PDS Tornado Watch" actually having the *reverse" effect and making a "regular" Tornado Watch less.... watchful, or seem less dangerous?

    My point is people become numb to warnings. PDS watches imply very specific conditions, but if the *public perception* of those forecasts veracity becomes jaded, it seems it's value is diminished. A Tornado Watch is inherently indicative of a dangerous situation, and if all PDS does is put the adverb "Particularly" in front of it, perhaps it's value isnt as great as intended.
    I think I agree with you here. In addition to what you said, I think the idea of PDS tornado watches insinuates a great degree in accuracy of forecasting than we currently have. We need to have standard tornado watches and only issue PDS tornado warnings as they happen. I think the verbiage “potential for long track tornadoes” is strong enough in conjunction with a standard watch to highlight the seriousness.

  25. #425

    Default Re: May 2024 - General Weather Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by C_M_25 View Post
    I think I agree with you here. In addition to what you said, I think the idea of PDS tornado watches insinuates a great degree in accuracy of forecasting than we currently have. We need to have standard tornado watches and only issue PDS tornado warnings as they happen. I think the verbiage “potential for long track tornadoes” is strong enough in conjunction with a standard watch to highlight the seriousness.
    Similar to how the newer Tornado Emergency is used when there is a PDS Tornado Warning.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. April 2024 - General Weather Discussion
    By LakeEffect in forum Weather & Geosciences
    Replies: 430
    Last Post: 05-01-2024, 08:16 AM
  2. March 2024 - General Weather Discussion
    By LakeEffect in forum Weather & Geosciences
    Replies: 87
    Last Post: 03-31-2024, 06:22 PM
  3. February 2024 - General Weather Discussion
    By Anonymous. in forum Weather & Geosciences
    Replies: 124
    Last Post: 02-29-2024, 01:50 PM
  4. January 2024 - General Weather Discussion
    By Anonymous. in forum Weather & Geosciences
    Replies: 215
    Last Post: 01-31-2024, 11:02 PM
  5. General Weather Discussion - May 2015
    By venture in forum Weather & Geosciences
    Replies: 623
    Last Post: 06-03-2015, 09:22 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO