Widgets Magazine
Page 111 of 217 FirstFirst ... 1161106107108109110111112113114115116161211 ... LastLast
Results 2,751 to 2,775 of 5410

Thread: Convention Center

  1. Default Re: Convention Center

    Quote Originally Posted by pahdz View Post
    I don't think people realize how much of a magnet that store STILL is for the area. I always have customers from out of town stop in there while they are here. Maybe Urbanized can confirm/deny.
    You're correct, Bass Pro is still very busy pretty much all of the time, and still draws an amazingly large contingent of out-of-towners. Pete is also right that a huge percentage of them drive there, shop, get back in the car and leave the area without buying so much as a cup of coffee elsewhere. That could have been avoided or greatly mitigated with the exact same store and location, but with better land use that encourages walkable interaction with the rest of the district. This would have also been a benefit for Bass Pro, as I can guarantee you that many people already in the district don't walk into BP, yet would if it didn't feel so remote and detatched. I do think that there are ways that it could be retrofitted. For instance, allowing small permanent retail structures to follow the "stream" that leads from the store to the canal.

    By the way, you would also be surprised at how much of Bricktown's business revolves around Harkins. In fact I think it was much more of a game-changer for the district than BP was, since it is better integrated with the district and serves as one portion of a visit to BT rather than as the entire visit.

  2. #2752

    Default Re: Convention Center

    Back when we were using Harkins as out main theater, we would regularly walk up the canal for lunch afterwards.

  3. Default Re: Convention Center

    Quote Originally Posted by Just the facts View Post
    Why stop at Harkins? Let's get some D9 dozers from Todd Hoffman and Parker, then bring in Tony Beets to oversee it. That site will be cleared by noon tomorrow.
    You could just ask any of the developers in town, particularly the out-of-state group behind Maywood Apartments 2, or the 400 N Walnut thing. Pro bono demo.

  4. #2754

    Default Re: Convention Center

    Lower BT may not be all that and a bag of chips when it comes to appearance, but there is a lot of money flowing in through there. Pretty, ugly, or pretty ugly, it's not a waste of space.

  5. Default Re: Convention Center

    Quote Originally Posted by kevinpate View Post
    Lower BT may not be all that and a bag of chips when it comes to appearance, but there is a lot of money flowing in through there. Pretty, ugly, or pretty ugly, it's not a waste of space.
    Certainly not a waste, as I enjoy Centennial Plaza and the surrounding structures that promote an enclosed, urban vibe. It's the rest of Lower Bricktown that is a mess of valuable real estate and parking lots. Unfortunately that "mess" represents a majority of LB's land area.

    I know the Convention Center wouldn't be able to fit on the UHaul site but it would go a long ways towards using some of the underutilized land in Lower Bricktown/South of Reno. The expanded concept of our Santa Fe Intermodal Hub does show a parking garage and relocated bus station on that site however.

  6. #2756

    Default Re: Convention Center

    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    The numbers at that Bass Pro have consistently outperformed projections, so they are clearly doing pretty well at that spot.

    But almost certainly the people shopping there all drive in and drive out without walking anywhere else.
    I haven't been in there for several years and then last month I stopped in twice on the way home from work and spent $250.

  7. #2757

    Default Re: Convention Center

    Regarding Bass Pro, I wonder if their presence has helped other businesses in Bricktown. The original intention of subsidizing Bass Pro in its current location was as a means to bring people downtown who wouldn't otherwise go there. I wonder how much it has actually helped.

  8. #2758

    Default Re: Convention Center

    Quote Originally Posted by bchris02 View Post
    Regarding Bass Pro, I wonder if their presence has helped other businesses in Bricktown. The original intention of subsidizing Bass Pro in its current location was as a means to bring people downtown who wouldn't otherwise go there. I wonder how much it has actually helped.
    I was actually surprised by the number of people there, but as it has been said early, there isn't any adjacent Bass Pro Oriented Development. Of course, BP itself might not be the problem since there is no adjacent retail space to rent even if someone wanted to open a store.

  9. #2759

    Default Re: Convention Center


  10. #2760

    Default Re: Convention Center

    Quote Originally Posted by Urbanized View Post
    You're correct, Bass Pro is still very busy pretty much all of the time, and still draws an amazingly large contingent of out-of-towners. Pete is also right that a huge percentage of them drive there, shop, get back in the car and leave the area without buying so much as a cup of coffee elsewhere. That could have been avoided or greatly mitigated with the exact same store and location, but with better land use that encourages walkable interaction with the rest of the district. This would have also been a benefit for Bass Pro, as I can guarantee you that many people already in the district don't walk into BP, yet would if it didn't feel so remote and detatched. I do think that there are ways that it could be retrofitted. For instance, allowing small permanent retail structures to follow the "stream" that leads from the store to the canal.

    By the way, you would also be surprised at how much of Bricktown's business revolves around Harkins. In fact I think it was much more of a game-changer for the district than BP was, since it is better integrated with the district and serves as one portion of a visit to BT rather than as the entire visit.
    I don't know who had the bright Idea to have the parking lot facing west. It would have been so much better it they either built a corner entrance or two entrances and had the building built where the current parking lot is.

  11. #2761

    Default Re: Convention Center

    Quote Originally Posted by jn1780 View Post
    I don't know who had the bright Idea to have the parking lot facing west.
    Agreed. Bass Pro could have been integrated into the district at no additional cost and on the exact same land, yet they decided to go with a standard big box. Having the parking lot facing east and the building interacting with the canal would have helped Bricktown, the canal, and Bass Pro. It would have been a win for everyone.

  12. Default Re: Convention Center

    Quote Originally Posted by Urbanized View Post
    You're correct, Bass Pro is still very busy pretty much all of the time, and still draws an amazingly large contingent of out-of-towners. Pete is also right that a huge percentage of them drive there, shop, get back in the car and leave the area without buying so much as a cup of coffee elsewhere. That could have been avoided or greatly mitigated with the exact same store and location, but with better land use that encourages walkable interaction with the rest of the district. This would have also been a benefit for Bass Pro, as I can guarantee you that many people already in the district don't walk into BP, yet would if it didn't feel so remote and detatched. I do think that there are ways that it could be retrofitted. For instance, allowing small permanent retail structures to follow the "stream" that leads from the store to the canal.

    By the way, you would also be surprised at how much of Bricktown's business revolves around Harkins. In fact I think it was much more of a game-changer for the district than BP was, since it is better integrated with the district and serves as one portion of a visit to BT rather than as the entire visit.
    Agreed that Bass Pro could be retrofitted... But will it? Likely never. It comes down to what Bass Pro wants, and whether or not urbanism really favors them, they don't want it. They made a brand decision for a regional store.

    We are losing all of our historic building stock. This CC is likely going to take away even more historic building stock. When the options are to demo everything on Main Street (talk about an unlucky address lately), or to tear down something in LB, which is a better option? Those buildings on Main have good uses in them, and will last forever. Those bldg's in LB have okay uses and a limited life span ahead of them, and the land is held by a developer who is in noncompliance with OCURA with zero intentions of finishing the project in a realistic time frame.

  13. #2763

    Default Re: Convention Center

    The Bass Pro building is owned by the City. Bass Pro has a 20 year lease which is coming up soon. As for Spartan's Main Street comment, OKC will soon rival Jax as the largest city with no businesses with a Main St address.

  14. #2764

    Default Re: Convention Center

    Quote Originally Posted by kevinpate View Post
    Lower BT may not be all that and a bag of chips when it comes to appearance, but there is a lot of money flowing in through there. Pretty, ugly, or pretty ugly, it's not a waste of space.
    There's actually a lot of wasted space. I think the success of what is there only goes to show what a missed opportunity it was.

  15. #2765

    Default Re: Convention Center

    Quote Originally Posted by Just the facts View Post
    The Bass Pro building is owned by the City. Bass Pro has a 20 year lease which is coming up soon. As for Spartan's Main Street comment, OKC will soon rival Jax as the largest city with no businesses with a Main St address.
    Whatever lease the City has with Bass Pro no doubt contains options that BP can exercise and you can bet they will.

  16. #2766

    Default Re: Convention Center

    Quote Originally Posted by Just the facts View Post
    The Bass Pro building is owned by the City. Bass Pro has a 20 year lease which is coming up soon. As for Spartan's Main Street comment, OKC will soon rival Jax as the largest city with no businesses with a Main St address.
    Not to be too nitpicking here, but 900 W. Main will be dynamite.

  17. #2767

    Default Re: Convention Center

    After Steve's chat today in the Daily I wonder what the Monday meeting will be like? Maybe a lot of finger pointing, huh?

  18. Default Re: Convention Center

    Quote Originally Posted by jn1780 View Post
    I don't know who had the bright Idea to have the parking lot facing west. It would have been so much better it they either built a corner entrance or two entrances and had the building built where the current parking lot is.
    Quote Originally Posted by bchris02 View Post
    Agreed. Bass Pro could have been integrated into the district at no additional cost and on the exact same land, yet they decided to go with a standard big box. Having the parking lot facing east and the building interacting with the canal would have helped Bricktown, the canal, and Bass Pro. It would have been a win for everyone.
    I actually wrote a column suggesting exactly this in The Gazette circa June 2002. This was before I was in my current role and written only as an interested citizen with some urban redevelopment training. It was also before any of the public nastiness regarding funding and the feud between OPUBCO and The Gazette; in fact I think it was the very first printed article or opinion piece of any type critical of any aspect of the BP deal. I am hardly a BP apologist, but it has definitely provided a good return on investment; just not as good as it COULD have been.

  19. Default Re: Convention Center

    Quote Originally Posted by Just the facts View Post
    The Bass Pro building is owned by the City. Bass Pro has a 20 year lease which is coming up soon. As for Spartan's Main Street comment, OKC will soon rival Jax as the largest city with no businesses with a Main St address.
    Claw back baby. Land assembly nightmare over.

  20. #2770

    Default Re: Convention Center

    After walking around the area and looking at all the options discussed here I think I am coming to the conclusion that the COX site is going to be the best option, but it will take some creative thinking to make it blend in with the area and I doubt we can build any of the exhibit halls underground, which is too bad because I really want that superblock gone. I am thinking that there will need to be decorative entrances facing the Arena, Santa Fe, and Broadway but on the MBG side they can build the convention hotel. The loading docs will have to be inside the building and to save space they can use air bearings to move them.


  21. #2771

    Default Re: Convention Center

    So are you saying the other two options: Howard/Hall or the South of the Arena are off the table completely?

  22. #2772
    HangryHippo Guest

    Default Re: Convention Center

    Quote Originally Posted by Just the facts View Post
    After walking around the area and looking at all the options discussed here I think I am coming to the conclusion that the COX site is going to be the best option, but it will take some creative thinking to make it blend in with the area and I doubt we can build any of the exhibit halls underground, which is too bad because I really want that superblock gone. I am thinking that there will need to be decorative entrances facing the Arena, Santa Fe, and Broadway but on the MBG side they can build the convention hotel. The loading docs will have to be inside the building and to save space they can use air bearings to move them.
    Agreed. I really do think it's the best solution. And that allows Hall and Howard to hopefully develop something truly kickass on the lot they own.

  23. #2773

    Default Re: Convention Center

    Quote Originally Posted by Stickman View Post
    So are you saying the other two options: Howard/Hall or the South of the Arena are off the table completely?
    The problem I am seeing south of the boulevard is that a super block in that area will cut-off traffic trying to get into the area from Shields, Everyone would have to funnel onto the boulevard to get to any place in core to shore, which will make traffic horrendous, and make the convention center even more isolated for pedrstrians. No east-west access for cars between SW25th and the boulevard because of the park will be bad enough.

  24. #2774

    Default Re: Convention Center

    Parking garage????????? lol

    Hopefully something better.

  25. #2775

    Default Re: Convention Center

    Quote Originally Posted by Just the facts View Post
    The problem I am seeing south of the boulevard is that a super block in that area will cut-off traffic trying to get into the area from Shields, Everyone would have to funnel onto the boulevard to get to any place in core to shore, which will make traffic horrendous, and make the convention center even more isolated for pedrstrians. No east-west access for cars between SW25th and the boulevard because of the park will be bad enough.
    Using the Cox Center would totally cut off the expansion of the CBD to the south and perpetuate the super block that already sits in the middle of downtown.

    The cc is going to create a super block no matter where you put it.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 21 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 21 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. New Arena (formerly Prairie Surf)
    By G.Walker in forum Development & Buildings
    Replies: 931
    Last Post: 06-11-2024, 03:10 AM
  2. Skirvin Expansion / Convention Center Hotel (dead)
    By Doug Loudenback in forum Development & Buildings
    Replies: 205
    Last Post: 04-12-2011, 01:13 PM
  3. Replies: 105
    Last Post: 08-05-2010, 12:54 PM
  4. Bricktown Central Plaza Hotel & Convention Center....
    By BricktownGuy in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 08-12-2006, 04:57 PM
  5. Does TULSA'S One Willams Center look like the World Trade Center?
    By thecains in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 06-07-2005, 01:42 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO