Originally Posted by
Spartan
Warning: The following is a back-and-forth that takes place with people who are on totally different levels of understanding and will likely not agree on anything
When I drive by "North Park" in Norman I see red dirt, tumbleweeds, parking lots, and EIFS. In other words, I see exactly what it is. When I drive by 19th Street in Moore, I see parking lots full of cars and lit-up interstate-size signs, oh, and a Wal-Mart. Is there something I'm missing there, because I fail to see this as some kind of model urban utopia. It's actually a piss-poor urban model, very unsustainable, that is comprised of buildings that are not even meant to still look nice after 20 years. *When I drive past the MWC Town Center, I see an attempt at something with more permanence that probably stands apart from other retail corridors in the metro. It is still kind of underwhelming for the ideas I look for in quality developments, but it at least makes an effort in terms of sustainable site layout, and I like the way they are expanding the town center portion to connect to the neighborhood in the back.
10 years ago, each case is different. MWC was a redevelopment project. Norman was an airfield. Moore was greenfield, farmland, etc.
No, it's hardly a curse to share a WALL, in fact, I wish these things would share a STREET, but the suburban model holds that that would be a curse. Eau contraire. And my reasoning, as an urban design student, is a joke?--then what is your reasoning, an LOL riot? And yes, these developments, and their fakeness, unsustainability, short-sighted values, and I could go on, ARE a blight to our lifestyle. Even though you were trying to put words in my mouth, I won't necessarily disagree with that. Some of us don't want to live in an urban environment modeled after WICHITA or GRAPEVINE.
Do I even have to explain what kind of squalor I envision for the future of the outlet mall in OKC city limits? The project is covered by freaking colored tarps, give me a break. I support the project and the city's use of taxpayer resources to land the project because it IS an economic development investment and a strong opportunity to bring in more sales, but come on, the project design is hideous.
Project design and economic development merits are two completely different things. Just because I attack strip malls doesn't entirely speak to how I would attempt to avoid more of them. It is very possible to recoup these investments and sales tax growth opportunities in ways that also contribute a positive, sustainable built environment. We just don't pursue those opportunities in Oklahoma because we don't look outside the box, and because we actually PREFER the cheapest and crappiest way to do things here. To quote a former public works director, "slightly better than crappy makes us happy!"
Bookmarks