Widgets Magazine
Page 101 of 383 FirstFirst ... 5196979899100101102103104105106151201 ... LastLast
Results 2,501 to 2,525 of 9575

Thread: Streetcar

  1. #2501

    Default Re: The Modern Streetcar and Commuter Transit Project in MAPS 3 Progresses

    While looking at condos here in Philly I came across The Phoenix. I found this comment very enticing. Something to think about as rail comes to Oklahoma.

    http://www.phillyphoenix.com/amenities.php

    The Phoenix condo offers instant Atrium access to the Suburban Station Concourse, which allows residents to stroll to nearby offices, or connect with rail service to 30 th Street Station, New York City, Philadelphia International Airport and the world beyond—all without stepping outside.
    Home to any point in the world without having to step outside.

  2. Default Re: The Modern Streetcar and Commuter Transit Project in MAPS 3 Progresses

    Seems like the future is pointing more toward BRT and LRT along Classen>NW Expressway rather than comprehensive commuter rail. That's a shame, because the commuter rail would be so much less expensive.

  3. #2503

    Default Re: The Modern Streetcar and Commuter Transit Project in MAPS 3 Progresses

    Quote Originally Posted by Spartan View Post
    Seems like the future is pointing more toward BRT and LRT along Classen>NW Expressway rather than comprehensive commuter rail. That's a shame, because the commuter rail would be so much less expensive.
    I don't follow. It's not technically feasible or the right application for such a cooridoor to the nw. The street grid requiring protected crossings, warning horns in residential, and frequent stops that commuter loco's can't efficiently perform.

    Not sure what you mean by this.

  4. #2504

    Default Re: The Modern Streetcar and Commuter Transit Project in MAPS 3 Progresses

    They could do cut and cover along NWExp but that would be expensive.

  5. #2505

    Default Re: The Modern Streetcar and Commuter Transit Project in MAPS 3 Progresses

    We did not successfully receive the TIGER 3 grant for our Intermodal Hub Application in December. However, the odds were not very high considering the following.

    "The Department of Transportation (DOT) received 848 project applications from all 50 states, Puerto Rico and Washington, DC, requesting a total of $14.29 billion, far exceeding the $511 million made available for grants under the TIGER III program." per the FTA website. http://www.dot.gov/affairs/2011/dot16511.html

    ODOT did however receive some monies to improve freight rail in Western Oklahoma.

  6. #2506

    Default Re: The Modern Streetcar and Commuter Transit Project in MAPS 3 Progresses

    What about any grants for the streetcar, not the hub?

  7. #2507

    Default Re: The Modern Streetcar and Commuter Transit Project in MAPS 3 Progresses

    Quote Originally Posted by catch22 View Post
    What about any grants for the streetcar, not the hub?
    We are going through the FTA required Environmental process right now. The Federal fiscal year ends September 30th so I would expect applications for both during 2012 and 2013 easily. And because our MAPS program is spread out over several years, I would expect even more applications beyond that. You can be rest assured that we will apply at any opportunity during this process in an attempt to maximize the MAPS 3 investment. That also includes creating new opportunities through the choices in types of transit investments that can be used as leverage as it relates to the MAPS monies available.

  8. #2508

    Default Re: The Modern Streetcar and Commuter Transit Project in MAPS 3 Progresses

    $511 million for the entire country. We should have called it a solar company and we could have gotten that much for one project. Like I said before, any state wanting to implement rail is going to have to do without the US government. Politicans in areas where rail doesn't exist are only interested in highway.

  9. #2509

    Default Re: The Modern Streetcar and Commuter Transit Project in MAPS 3 Progresses

    Quote Originally Posted by Just the facts View Post
    $511 million for the entire country.
    It is absurd isn't it.

  10. #2510

    Default Re: The Modern Streetcar and Commuter Transit Project in MAPS 3 Progresses

    Quote Originally Posted by Urban Pioneer View Post
    It is absurd isn't it.
    It is actually a national embarrassment and a sign to me that this country at the national level has thrown in the towel.

  11. #2511

    Default Re: The Modern Streetcar and Commuter Transit Project in MAPS 3 Progresses

    Quote Originally Posted by Urban Pioneer View Post
    We did not successfully receive the TIGER 3 grant for our Intermodal Hub Application in December. However, the odds were not very high considering the following.

    "The Department of Transportation (DOT) received 848 project applications from all 50 states, Puerto Rico and Washington, DC, requesting a total of $14.29 billion, far exceeding the $511 million made available for grants under the TIGER III program." per the FTA website. http://www.dot.gov/affairs/2011/dot16511.html

    ODOT did however receive some monies to improve freight rail in Western Oklahoma.
    That's disappointing. Although IIRC the City was very optimistic that the money would come thru weren't they? Thought I saw that at a Council presentation a while back???

  12. #2512

    Default Re: The Modern Streetcar and Commuter Transit Project in MAPS 3 Progresses

    Quote Originally Posted by Just the facts View Post
    $511 million for the entire country.
    I hope the entire country gets to drive on our new stretch of I-40 that cost $169 million more ;-)

  13. #2513

    Default Re: The Modern Streetcar and Commuter Transit Project in MAPS 3 Progresses

    Good point on I-40. I do think that the highway project is reflective of how Washington has changed regarding transportation funding in a broad sense. Totally gridlocked and unable to fund much of anything substantial. We happened to pursue the new Crosstown at a time when infrastructure/transportation spending was not demonized and more readily available.

    I commend Senator Inhofe for not conceding to partisan anti-tax/wasteful spending rhetoric when it comes to infrastructure. He gave a fairly eloquent speech at the dedication and is probably the best influence we have in Washington when it comes to infrastructure bills. Depending on 2012 elections, his seniority would place him in a great position of influence if Republicans regained control of the Senate. Even if not, it is my hope that in the spirit of bi-partisanship, he will be able to negotiate for funding opportunities for Oklahoma City projects.

  14. #2514

    Default Re: The Modern Streetcar and Commuter Transit Project in MAPS 3 Progresses

    Quote Originally Posted by OKCisOK4me View Post
    I hope the entire country gets to drive on our new stretch of I-40 that cost $169 million more ;-)
    That would be awesome, if 1/4 of them stop and eat/shop, just think of the tax dollars it would bring, Great Idea.

  15. #2515

    Default Re: The Modern Streetcar and Commuter Transit Project in MAPS 3 Progresses

    I don't know if it has been mentioned but on August 19th, Norfolk, Virginia, started operating procedures on their 7.4 mile, $318.5 million light rail system. Not too shabby!

  16. #2516

    Default Re: The Modern Streetcar and Commuter Transit Project in MAPS 3 Progresses

    Quote Originally Posted by rcjunkie View Post
    That would be awesome, if 1/4 of them stop and eat/shop, just think of the tax dollars it would bring, Great Idea.
    Most of them would run out of gas sitting in traffic.

  17. #2517

    Default Re: The Modern Streetcar and Commuter Transit Project in MAPS 3 Progresses

    Quote Originally Posted by OKCisOK4me View Post
    I don't know if it has been mentioned but on August 19th, Norfolk, Virginia, started operating procedures on their 7.4 mile, $318.5 million light rail system. Not too shabby!
    Here is a story on it. 75,000 trips in the first 72 hours.

    http://www.lightrailnow.org/news/n_nfk_2011-09a.htm

    Norfolk, Virginia — After decades of campaigning and planning, on 19 August 2011 this urban area near Virginia's Atlantic coast finally opened its first light rail transit (LRT) starter line, a nifty little system branded as The Tide that runs eastward 7.4 miles (11.9 km) from the city's Medical Center area, through the CBD, and on to its eastern terminus at Newtown Road. It's America's latest interurban-type LRT system, and initial indications are it's a big hit.

  18. #2518

    Default Re: The Modern Streetcar and Commuter Transit Project in MAPS 3 Progresses

    The next MAPS 3 Streetcar/Transit Subcommittee meeting is:

    January 25th, Wednesday
    3:30 PM
    420 Main (10th Floor Conference Room)

  19. #2519

    Default Re: The Modern Streetcar and Commuter Transit Project in MAPS 3 Progresses

    Quote Originally Posted by Urban Pioneer View Post
    The next MAPS 3 Streetcar/Transit Subcommittee meeting is:

    January 25th, Wednesday
    3:30 PM
    420 Main (10th Floor Conference Room)
    I'd love to go to one of these things but they just don't work out with my work schedule...EVER :-(

  20. #2520

    Default Re: The Modern Streetcar and Commuter Transit Project in MAPS 3 Progresses

    Quote Originally Posted by OKCisOK4me View Post
    EVER :-(
    So sorry... lol Maybe at some point we will have a public meeting at a couple diverse times to gather additional input if it is warranted in the future. Right now, MAPS meetings are normally scheduled by city staff and are "back to back" during the day. They usually put us last because we tend to go a bit longer. lol The Park Subcommittee is right before us in the same room. Actually, sometimes we have to wait on them too.

  21. #2521

    Default Re: The Modern Streetcar and Commuter Transit Project in MAPS 3 Progresses

    If it could be on a Sunday, that would be perfect!

  22. #2522

    Default Re: The Modern Streetcar and Commuter Transit Project in MAPS 3 Progresses

    Interesting 2008 article that Marion Hutchison dug up from the Gazette archives...

    http://www.okgazette.com/oklahoma/ar...o-the-car.html

    Oklahoma City wasn't always married to the car

    November 13th, 2008
    Mike Coppock

    Dr. George Cross, president of the University of Oklahoma, began writing a heartfelt letter to the Oklahoma Corporation Commission at his desk. It was the summer of 1946 and the new owners of the Oklahoma Railway Company had just petitioned the commission seeking to discontinue commuter rail service from Oklahoma City to Norman.

    Dr. Cross' concern, as well as that of the Norman Chamber of Commerce, was that ending commuter rail service would greatly affect people needing to get to Norman. Many have forgotten that Oklahoma City had a commuter rail service from 1903 to 1946. At its height, Oklahoma City passengers could ride the electric rails from downtown OKC to Guthrie, El Reno or Norman for a fare ranging anywhere from a nickel to a quarter. Oklahoma City's Belle Isle Power Plant, owned by the Oklahoma Railway Company until 1928, was not constructed to provide electricity to the city, but in order to power the "interurbans," as electric trains were called.

    Oklahoma City was not alone in the state with interurban rail service.
    McAlester started up a service the same year Oklahoma City did while Guthrie and Muskogee followed up with theirs the following year. A total of 17 electric interurbans eventually operated in the state by 1915, including such seemingly rural settings as Nowata, Clinton, Ardmore, Bartlesville and Miami, and continued to operate until the end of World War II.

    "Originally, they were used by workers getting from point A to point B," said Michael Dean, public relations director with the Oklahoma Historical Society. "If you were incredibly rich, you had a carriage and a driver to get you to work. For Oklahoma City, the interurbans were used to get people from their homes to downtown or to the meat packing plants by the stockyards."


    EXPANDING THE LINE

    Before statehood, and even before Oklahoma City became the capital of Oklahoma, WW Storm began the Metropolitan Railway Company in 1902. It was a very modest affair, consisting of four miles of track centered in downtown Oklahoma City. In January 1904, Anton Classen and John Shartel took over the interurban, renaming it the Oklahoma Railway Company. The two were very ambitious, running track up what would become Classen Boulevard from downtown.

    In 1908, they finished construction of the Belle Isle Power Plant to provide electricity for their trains. They also developed Belle Isle Park as a destination " conveniently at the end of one of their interurban lines " for Oklahoma City residents to escape the city. By the next year, they had bought 29 new trains, built two on their own and had laid 32 miles of track.

    "It was a marketing tool to sell houses," Dean said. "They were building housing additions and were laying rail from them to where people worked."
    In 1910, they took over another Oklahoma City interurban company. By now, Classen and Shartel had 46 passenger cars, had connected Britton with Oklahoma City and were beginning to lay track to Guthrie.

    In 1911, they absorbed a similar El Reno firm and linked up with Norman to the south and Edmond to the north. The Guthrie connection was completed in 1916.
    With a passenger and freight terminal at Grand Avenue and Hudson, the interurban line was now taking people not only to work, but the state fairgrounds, the University of Oklahoma, the teachers' college in Edmond (now the University of Central Oklahoma), and to amusement parks at Belle Isle and Wheeler Park.

    "There was enormous pressure on them from the city and officials to expand their line," said Dean, noting the Oklahoma Railway had gone far beyond the housing districts Classen and Shartel had built. A workers strike in 1911 demonstrated how important the interurbans had become to a city of 65,000.

    By the early 1920s, both Classen and Shartel were out of the interurban rail business.
    "In the 1920s, they were in constant receivership," Dean pointed out. "The interurbans never paid a dividend to their investors." A large part of the reason for this was due to continually expanding the system.


    BORROWING TO PAY

    To do so, the Oklahoma Railway was constantly borrowing to pay for the expansion. The firm found itself it a catch-22 situation. The public and local government demanded their expansion and in so doing the lines' profits were eaten away from paying off loans.
    This was demonstrated after Hubert Hudson took over the company in 1927, spending more than $2 million for expansion. To offset costs, Hudson sold Belle Isle to Oklahoma City.

    Then Oklahoma City saw its interurban commuter train system hit by both the Great Depression and the Dust Bowl. Revenues plunged and the company was handed over to the federal government to be administered from 1939 to 1945.

    "During the '30s, you can see they were doing everything they could to keep going," said Dean. "They were adjusting rates and they were adjusting routes."
    By the time the U.S. entered World War II, the green and cream electric trolleys were running just five routes: along Classen, Belle Isle to the state Capitol, to the fairgrounds, to the stockyards, and a loop around downtown.

    World War II, however, created a boom in interurban usage. In 1941, prior to Pearl Harbor, 39 train runs were conducted daily; by 1944, that number was up to 192.
    All that traffic was overwhelming the 11 interurbans and 40 streetcars the firm operated. The U.S. Navy helped some: Since the line served the two naval bases on Norman's north side, the Navy bought 10 and converted two that were being used as roadside diners.
    By 1944, there had been over two million commuter rides on the interurban trains and 52 million on the streetcars.


    END OF THE LINE

    But the end of the war brought an end to the boom in business. The two naval bases were closed. Revenue plummeted. Postwar prosperity, with its cheap fuel and emphasis on cars, was ending the need for the interurbans. "Oklahoma City was already starting to spread out by then," Dean said. "The first shopping center had already gone up."
    But, Eugene Jordan of Jordan Petroleum and his partner Robert Bowers still saw the interurbans as a threat. They had earlier bought the Oklahoma Transportation Corporation, an instate version of Greyhound, for $1.6 million. Now they petitioned the court to buy the Oklahoma Railway Company with its interurbans and city buses for $2.5 million. The court agreed, transferring ownership to the Oklahoma Transportation Corporation in the fall of 1945.

    Jordan and Bowers quickly sold off the firm's assets. The trains were sold to a firm in Mexico City.

    By 1947, only old rail tracks embedded into city streets were left of commuter rail in Oklahoma City.

    The next year, in 1948, the last of the commuter rails, the Nowata-Union Electric Railway shut down, ending commuter rail within the state. "Mike Coppock

  23. #2523

    Default Re: The Modern Streetcar and Commuter Transit Project in MAPS 3 Progresses

    This article is why I laugh at people who say it can't be done today. With a population of just 65,000 there had been 54,000,000 trips and a peak of 192 trains a day.

  24. #2524

    Default Re: The Modern Streetcar and Commuter Transit Project in MAPS 3 Progresses

    Quote Originally Posted by Just the facts View Post
    This article is why I laugh at people who say it can't be done today. With a population of just 65,000 there had been 54,000,000 trips and a peak of 192 trains a day.
    As you always say, being "urban" has nothing to do with the amount of people, rather how infrastructure and buildings are oriented.

  25. #2525

    Default Re: The Modern Streetcar and Commuter Transit Project in MAPS 3 Progresses

    Quote Originally Posted by Just the facts View Post
    This article is why I laugh at people who say it can't be done today. With a population of just 65,000 there had been 54,000,000 trips and a peak of 192 trains a day.
    Yes, but that was also the days before downtown convention centers and cash producing parking lots.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. OKC mass transit announcement!!
    By metro in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 444
    Last Post: 05-05-2010, 11:56 AM
  2. The Portland Streetcar: A case in point
    By betts in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 12-07-2009, 09:34 AM
  3. MAPS 3 News Compendium
    By Doug Loudenback in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 108
    Last Post: 12-05-2009, 10:55 AM
  4. New info on MAPS 3
    By metro in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 533
    Last Post: 12-02-2009, 10:56 AM
  5. MAPS 3 Press release
    By ChowRunner in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 167
    Last Post: 10-03-2009, 04:58 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO