Widgets Magazine
Page 4 of 28 FirstFirst 123456789 ... LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 694

Thread: Strawberry Fields

  1. #76

    Default Re: Strawberry Fields

    I'm looking into getting into real estate investing, and if I had the money I would be involved in it as well. This is a chance to really build out Downtown OKC and make a hell of an impact on the appearance of Dowtown as part of the overall core to shore plan.

  2. #77

    Default Re: Strawberry Fields

    are you implying there could be something fishy here, like say...coff coff, money laundering, coff coff...?



    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    1. Who are the Salames? What did they do for a living before starting these acquisitions? (All I know is Pat Salame used to work at the Waco equipment rental place on Classen and that they own a few small apartment buildings and they are both in their 60's)
    2. Where did they get the $15 million to buy, scrape and sit on properties indefinitely?
    3. Was Pat Salame even asked about her scores of investors (common knowledge) and who they might be?
    4. Are they working with any of the 10+ other large property owners in the area between Scissortail Park and Western? (several own as much property, their 'master plan' shows grand vision for property of which only about 25% is owned by them)
    5. How many demolitions have they performed rather than the one example of a structure they bought and left standing? (dozens, if you follow the permitting process)
    6. Do they have plans to develop any of the property themselves? (I know for a fact they have spoken to other developers about spinning some land off for housing and were refused, at least for the time being)
    7. Are they just speculators who plan to sit on most this property until others come in and offer them and their many investors a nice profit?

    If you look at the map below, you'll see their ownership in pink. What you notice is that it is largely fragments that sit among other large property owners. (Green is city-owned).

    There are at least a dozen owners / investors that own big chunks all around them.


  3. #78

    Default Re: Strawberry Fields

    Quote Originally Posted by OKC2017 View Post
    are you implying there could be something fishy here, like say...coff coff, money laundering, coff coff...?
    Absolutely not, just pointing out how it's another PR / promotional / softball piece by the Oklahoman on behalf of a big investor / developer, will many relevant unasked questions.

    If I have a concern it's that this group will do nothing but drive up prices and make it harder for real developers to make something happen in that area.

    Expect every project to 'need' plenty of TIF dollars, even though the city is investing hundreds of millions in the immediate area.

  4. #79

    Default Re: Strawberry Fields

    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    Absolutely not, just pointing out how it's another PR / promotional / softball piece by the Oklahoman on behalf of a big investor / developer, will many relevant unasked questions.

    If I have a concern it's that this group will do nothing but drive up prices and make it harder for real developers to make something happen in that area.

    Expect every project to 'need' plenty of TIF dollars, even though the city is investing hundreds of millions in the immediate area.
    Finally someone is asking the real questions. I have always wondered how a property could be listed for sale at 3 million and only be taxed at the assessment value of 100k. If the property is worth 3 million then shouldn't it be taxed at 3 million to the current owners? Why is it only cool to tax the developer of the land at a 3 million dollar value.

    Tldr; it seems our property tax system encourages this behavior.

  5. #80

    Default Re: Strawberry Fields

    ^

    It also explains how Rick Dowell can sit on a property for 22 years in the heart of downtown and do nothing, because it's not costing him anything to do so.

    And for this area of downtown, there are lots of speculators and no development. When it is time to develop, I'm afraid only the speculators will make money and the real developers will then come to the city with their hand out for TIF dollars because "they can't make the numbers work at these prices".

  6. #81

    Default Re: Strawberry Fields

    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    Absolutely not, just pointing out how it's another PR / promotional / softball piece by the Oklahoman on behalf of a big investor / developer, will many relevant unasked questions.

    If I have a concern it's that this group will do nothing but drive up prices and make it harder for real developers to make something happen in that area.

    Expect every project to 'need' plenty of TIF dollars, even though the city is investing hundreds of millions in the immediate area.
    Ugh, I hope not. Scissortail Park and all the other MAPS things in the area should be the "TIF." The city shouldnt be doing big projects that help bring new development and then still subsidize private developments.

    Quote Originally Posted by HHE View Post
    Finally someone is asking the real questions. I have always wondered how a property could be listed for sale at 3 million and only be taxed at the assessment value of 100k. If the property is worth 3 million then shouldn't it be taxed at 3 million to the current owners? Why is it only cool to tax the developer of the land at a 3 million dollar value.

    Tldr; it seems our property tax system encourages this behavior.
    Thats going to happen when land/property prices rapidly increase. The annual maximum 5% bump in taxable value cant ever catch up. So basically its great for the city and state when old, undervalued land gets sold and a new taxable value is established. New property transactions correct that ad valorem imbalance.

    Im sure no one in Oklahoma wants to see Texas like property tax rates but I do believe it spurs more people to do something with their property (rent, redevelop, etc) because it can be much more expensive there to let it sit empty and do nothing with it.

  7. #82

    Default Re: Strawberry Fields

    ^

    They just established a huge new TIF for this area in addition to everything else the taxpayers are already paying for: Park, boulevard, brand new Hudson Ave., streetcar, etc.

  8. #83

    Default Re: Strawberry Fields

    Here's one example of the type of houses I would love to see built in the area and elsewhere in Core to Shore, and anywhere else in the core for that matter.

    Rowhouses in Cincinnati built in 1992.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	cincinnati row homes 1992.jpg 
Views:	265 
Size:	32.6 KB 
ID:	13959

  9. #84

    Default Re: Strawberry Fields

    ^^^^^^

  10. #85

    Default Re: Strawberry Fields

    Quote Originally Posted by KayneMo View Post
    Here's one example of the type of houses I would love to see built in the area and elsewhere in Core to Shore, and anywhere else in the core for that matter.

    Rowhouses in Cincinnati built in 1992.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	cincinnati row homes 1992.jpg 
Views:	265 
Size:	32.6 KB 
ID:	13959
    I don't see how that is much different than Deep Duece.

    What's I'd really love to see is an entire district of 3-6 story buildings that had street retail in every building and residential on floors 2-6. With very very little parking.

  11. #86

    Default Re: Strawberry Fields

    Quote Originally Posted by jccouger View Post
    I don't see how that is much different than Deep Duece.

    What's I'd really love to see is an entire district of 3-6 story buildings that had street retail in every building and residential on floors 2-6. With very very little parking.
    Interesting, they look quite different to me than what is currently in Deep Deuce. I agree with your second sentence, though.

  12. #87

    Default Re: Strawberry Fields

    I'd love more of an appearance similar to the Back Bay in Boston. I always thought that was one of the most beautiful neighborhoods, although expensive as crap.

  13. #88

    Default Re: Strawberry Fields

    If they want to get something going down there, they should do a limited amount of halfway affordable for sale units, something not currently available in the core.

    Plus, almost everything they own is in the middle of that area, so not well suited for anything commercial.

  14. #89

    Default Re: Strawberry Fields


  15. #90

    Default Re: Strawberry Fields

    All of those beautiful, mature trees...

  16. #91
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    339
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Strawberry Fields

    ^ they will no doubt be mowed down the nanosecond development starts taking place.

  17. #92

    Default Re: Strawberry Fields

    This is also in the primary zone for John Rex. Will give you first priority in getting in.

  18. Default Re: Strawberry Fields

    Quote Originally Posted by Eddie1 View Post
    ^ they will no doubt be mowed down the nanosecond development starts taking place.
    Whatever needs to be done to make the City look less than 50 years old.

    Edit: Let's be a little more generous and say no older than WW2. So 70 years.


  19. #95

    Default Re: Strawberry Fields

    Quote Originally Posted by Pete View Post
    If they want to get something going down there, they should do a limited amount of halfway affordable for sale units, something not currently available in the core.

    Plus, almost everything they own is in the middle of that area, so not well suited for anything commercial.
    If enough people live there why wouldn't commercial work? Because of the masterplan? I would think if there is sufficient density, food places, laundromats, convenience stores, etc would work well as ground floor retail. This style of development may not be what they are going for, and certainly would be unprecedented in OK, but it could be done.

  20. #96

    Default Re: Strawberry Fields

    Quote Originally Posted by Ross MacLochness View Post
    If enough people live there why wouldn't commercial work? Because of the masterplan? I would think if there is sufficient density, food places, laundromats, convenience stores, etc would work well as ground floor retail. This style of development may not be what they are going for, and certainly would be unprecedented in OK, but it could be done.
    Just meant the people must come first.

  21. Default Re: Strawberry Fields

    Woah... at first this looked new. No date. Posted just now on Facebook.

    http://www.gsb-inc.com/strawberry-fields/

  22. #98

    Default Re: Strawberry Fields

    ^ Right, just saw these.

    Here are the newish images:











  23. Default Re: Strawberry Fields

    Jinx

  24. Default Re: Strawberry Fields

    The first thing I thought of Pete were the drone photos you shot compared to this. So much more density!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Soccer Fields
    By elitespy in forum Ask Anything About OKC
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-02-2014, 04:21 AM
  2. OKC Public Schools - Fields and Futures
    By Architect2010 in forum General Civic Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-03-2013, 07:04 PM
  3. Strawberry Beer
    By kelly73099 in forum General Food & Drink Topics
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-18-2012, 05:58 PM
  4. Seeking contractors in several fields
    By kevinpate in forum Businesses & Employers
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-28-2008, 03:32 PM
  5. Strawberry Meth Kids
    By Karried in forum Current Events & Open Topic
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-09-2007, 12:55 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO